Thursday 6 December 2007

ARMENIANS DEMAND JUSTICE NOT RECOGNITION


By Harut Sassounian - Publisher, The California Courier

The National Herald, a Greek-American weekly, published a lengthy interview with this writer last week on the issue of genocide recognition. This column was prompted by the ideas expressed in that interview.
The Armenian Cause is not about genocide recognition, but the pursuit of justice which entails that the Armenian victims receive reparations.
Remembering the Genocide is also about keeping the hope and dream alive for succeeding generations of Armenians -- that some day, they will regain their historic lands.

Armenians need to rethink their approach to the pursuit of their cause and present their demands in a more effective manner. The House of Representatives has already adopted an Armenian Genocide resolution twice in 1975 and 1984. Pres. Reagan issued a Presidential Proclamation in 1981 that refers to the Armenian Genocide. More than 20 countries, the European Parliament, a U.N. human rights panel and many genocide and Holocaust scholars have acknowledged the Armenian Genocide. Therefore, continuing attempts to seek genocide recognition from the international community is no longer necessary and distracts from the pursuit of more significant Armenian political objectives.
Armenians have been saying for decades that they have three demands: “Recognition” of the genocide, “Reparations” for losses, and “Return” of their territories -- in that sequence. They have repeated these three R’s so often that even Turkey’s leaders, who closely monitor Armenian statements, have learned them by heart.
Consequently, Armenians and Turks now have the same distorted view of what the Armenian Cause is all about. Both sides mistakenly believe that once the Genocide is recognised by Turks and others, Armenians will proceed to make demands for reparations and lands. This is the main reason why Turks so adamantly refuse to acknowledge the Armenian Genocide. They fear that acceptance of the Genocide would obligate them to pay reparations and return the usurped Armenian lands. And knowing well the sequence of the three R’s, Turks cleverly refuse to acknowledge the Genocide -- the first demand -- thus preempting the remaining two Armenian demands.
Armenians should not fall in the Turkish trap of getting stuck on demand number one. Since genocide recognition has already been accomplished, they should immediately proceed to the second and third demands. There is no prerequisite that the Turks -- or the U.S. or anybody else, for that matter -- first acknowledge the Genocide before Armenians can take legal action. Armenians should present their demands to appropriate national and international courts, regardless of whether the Turks recognise the Genocide.
Is justice served when someone murders your family, and the criminal’s descendants who still live on your property simply admit 100 years later that such a crime actually occurred? Would you just thank the murderer’s descendants for acknowledging the crime or would you press to get your family’s stolen property back?
The acknowledgement of the Genocide by Turks or others is not an occasion for Armenians to jump for joy. Genocide is an undeniable fact. Armenians know it happened. The civilised world knows it happened. Many Turks also know it happened. The acknowledgement of a historical fact cannot be viewed as a demand. Justice requires that the criminal be punished, reparations paid, and the ill-gotten fruits gained through genocide returned to their rightful owners.
Obviously, the Turks are not going to voluntarily return the Armenian lands even though Armenians have a just claim to those territories. Nobody gives an inch of land to anyone unless forced to do so. So how does such a claim become reality? It can be done by keeping the hope and dream alive and passing them on to the next generation, the way the Jews did by proclaiming "Next year in Jerusalem" for two thousand years. The just demand for the recovery of their historic lands can disappear once Armenians lose all hope and unilaterally give up their dream.
There is no country in recorded history whose borders have remained unchanged. Mighty empires have come and gone. Likewise, the Republic of Turkey will not have the same borders forever. No one knows what can happen in the next 30 years or 300 years, but if Armenians relinquish their claims now, they would have lost the chance of recovering anything forever. Armenians must continue to remind their offspring for generations to come that those lands which were unjustly stolen from them will eventually return to their rightful owners.
Rather than demanding genocide recognition, Armenians should seek justice

3 comments:

Seta said...

ARMENIANS DEMAND JUSTICE NOT RECOGNITION
By Harut Sassounian - Publisher, The California Courier

My response to the above article…In the early days, how much kudos would we have had if we used or demanded any thing other than the word ‘Recognition’? We had to make a start and the Recognition is the least we deserve. In my family’s case, we lost lands twice, and this is how. My great, great grand parents were merchants and silk farmers in the east of Turkey. They had vast lands and traded, these lands were lost when they managed to get out losing their child, my grandmother later found, on the way. Some went over land and some were hoarded onto boats and ended up going to Cyprus. Some were accepted by the Lebanese government, where they too were given land to work and make their living. Years of warring factions and instability has promoted the repossession of those lands. This situation in the Middle East has meant those lands have also been retrieved and or lost to those who perished in the many conflicts in that part of the world.
The three ‘R’s’ mean so much more than Reading, wRiting and aRithmetic. To Armenians they are: Recognition, Reparation and Return. This is what we strive for in the final settlement of the 92 year old conflict with our people.
I have a Turkish acquaintance in a major City living in Turkey, an academic, lecturer, philosopher and a poet. He vehemently refutes the Armenian genocide and quotes Turkish governmental propaganda because he knows that the lands occupied by the Turks now are those of our forefathers. His new home would be the first to be returned and a loss to him.
My friend’s invitation feels damning to me belittling too, ironically when one looks at the implications of his invitation. I therefore turn down his invitation saying, ‘I do not want an invitation to my own homeland, when we Armenians regain our lands, I want to invite you to my home and cook you a meal.
We do not need recognition by Turkey, they did not ask if they could carry out genocide, they just did it under the noses of the Germans with one eye open and the other shut under the guise of World War I.
Though there are no prerequisites to the recognition of the Armenian Genocide, we Armenians have always tried to be democratic, diplomatic and give respect to not only those nations who have given recognition but also to the many Turks who can’t declare their alliance to the Armenians openly.
The present Turkish government have a fierce hold over its people, we have so much evidence. Hrant Dink’s brutal assassination because he spoke for the Armenian’s, must not be forgotten and that of his family’s suffering and of their persecution to date.
I have a few famously uttered words of about a couple of thousand years ago in the Bible, ‘Let my people go’ I ask the twenty first century Turkish government to ‘Let my people go,’ I not only include the millions of Armenian’s who live in Turkey but Turks too! I reach out the hand of humanity, set them free from the shackles of your threats by which you hold them ransomed and make a real difference to the world by leading the way to stop genocide happening else where. Share this God given land once more with those whose rightful place it is. These ancient Armenian lands consist of our Armenian forefathers DNA, it is imprinted in the soil, and no doubt the same applies if DNA from Turks is obtained, to my mind theirs too will show Armenian DNA.
We have more in common than is possible to imagine, here is something to ponder over, on the day of the Khachkar memorial. Mr Nakashian, an Artist and a painter, was purported to have been approached by a Turkish reporter wanting to report on his views to which he replied, look at me and look at you wouldn’t you say that there are strong similarities between us, you could be my daughter and I could be your father. Hearing these words the reporter had tears in here eyes.
Last Sunday, Bishop Nathan delivered his sermon and pointed out the greed in man. We humans are famous for it we want things we don’t need, he gave us examples, of greed by governments, who by warring, have a means to access and feed their greed.

Sassounian mentions in his article, ‘The civilised world knows it happened.’ We do not need to have recognition by Turkey, they have a difficult task ahead. It is Turkeys’ ancestors who have set the present Turkish government the precedent for the Turkish nation. I only pray for them and all leaders of nations who are involved in bringing the three R’s as Armenians know them to be, Recognition, Reparation, and Return, to fruition.
I look forward to going back to my ancestral home and inviting my friends and family to a house warming, will it happen I wonder? Diaspora Armenians are agreed that a peaceful solution can concluded this sorrowful situation, so we respectfully and quietly remember the Armenian Genocide of 1915 on every 24th April at the cenotaph.

David Boyajian said...

Harut Sassounian's article, "ARMENIANS DEMAND JUSTICE NOT RECOGNITION," demonstrates again that he is not only a fine writer - perhaps the best Armenian American writer and investigative journalist today - but also an opinion leader.

I agree with him that we must move beyond mere genocide "acknowledgment."

I humbly offer the following two articles that address similar themes:

(1) Genocide Acknowledgment: A Dead End?

http://www.armeniapedia.org/index.php?title=Genocide_Acknowledgment:_A_Dead_End%3F

(2) The Armenian Land Question: Misunderstood Terrain

http://www.armeniapedia.org/index.php?title=The_Armenian_Land_Question:_Misunderstood_Terrain

Lingua said...

I must agree with David Boyajian about Sassounian being one of the finest writers, investigative journalists and opinion leaders we have today.

Boyajian himself is not far behind Sassounian in these departments.