Showing posts with label 14th July 2009. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 14th July 2009. Show all posts

Tuesday, 14 July 2009


Welsh Shepherd Does More for
Armenian Cause than Most Armenians
By Harut Sassounian
Publisher, The California Courier
16 Jul7 2009

Incredible, but true! Eilian Williams, a shepherd in Wales, has done more
in support of the Armenian Cause than most Armenians, despite the fact that
he is not related to Armenians by heritage or marriage. For all his good
work, he has received no recognition and no appreciation. Most Armenians, except
for a small circle in London, are neither aware of his existence nor his
selfless efforts.

His first involvement with Armenians began in 1998 when an Armenian
acquaintance asked him to arrange for the Armenian Church Choir to perform in
Eisteddfod, a Welsh Cultural Festival. This prompted him to form the "Wales
Armenia Solidarity" group.

On April 24, 2001, Mr. Williams organized the first Armenian Genocide
commemoration in the Temple of Peace, located in Cardiff, Wales. He then
succeeded in getting the National Assembly for Wales in October 2002 to officially
recognize the Armenian Genocide and organized a special commemorative event
in the National Assembly building, which was attended by Armenia's Ambassador
to the United Kingdom.

Through his persistent efforts, the Gwynedd County Council in March 2004
became the first municipality in the UK to recognize the Armenian Genocide.
In October 2004, Mr. Williams arranged for the Prime Minister of the
Republic of Nagorno Karabagh (Artsakh) to be received by the Presiding Officer
(Speaker) of the National Assembly for Wales, thus boosting the legitimacy of
Artsakh's statehood.

Two years later, Mr. Williams was able to persuade the majority of the
members of the National Assembly for Wales to support the Assyrian/Armenian
Genocide Early Day Motion (EDM).

In January 2007, he organized the Hrant Dink Commemoration in the British
Parliament. He also lobbied for the Armenian Genocide Motion in the House of
Commons which garnered the signatures of 182 Members of Parliament.

On November 3, 2007, at the inauguration of the Armenian Genocide Monument
in Cardiff, which Mr. Williams and John Torosyan helped organize, the
Speaker of the National Assembly for Wales made scathing remarks about Turkey.
Turkish hooligans tried to disrupt the solemn proceedings; several months
later, they desecrated the Genocide Memorial.

Over the years, I had followed with great admiration the unpublicized
activities of this "odar" shepherd of Wales. However, I had no direct contact
with him until last month, when I received from him the text of a new Early Day
Motion that he had submitted to the British House of Commons. The Motion
demands that Turkey return the more than 2,000 Armenian, Assyrian and Syriac
churches and religious monuments confiscated by the Turkish government after
the 1915 Genocide to the jurisdiction of their respective Patriarchates as
"a measure of restitution."

The Motion further asks that the British government recognize the fact that
these minorities were ethnically cleansed in the years following 1915, as
was recently acknowledged by Turkish Prime Minister Rejeb Erdogan. The Motion
has so far gained the support of 23 Members of the British Parliament.

This Motion attracted my attention because in recent months, I have been
advocating such an initiative through my columns and lectures. I was
pleasantly surprised when the Welsh shepherd sent me an e-mail last month informing
that he had decided to take this action after reading my columns and
particularly the remarks I had delivered at the House of Commons on May 7.
Armenian-Americans should follow the good example set by Mr. Williams and
submit a similar resolution to the U.S. Congress. It would be practically
impossible for any Member of Congress to oppose a motion that calls for the
return of Armenian houses of worship to their rightful owner, the Armenian
Patriarchate of Istanbul. Such a resolution would go beyond the mere
acknowledgment of the Genocide, by seeking to restore some of the massive losses
suffered by the Armenians.

European Armenians should go even further by filing a lawsuit in the
European Court of Human Rights, seeking a judgment for the immediate return of the
churches and religious monuments to the Armenian Patriarchate. It is
unconscionable that these Armenian churches -- the ones not yet destroyed -- have
been converted to mosques, warehouses and living quarters, and no one is
contesting this shameful state of affairs! One can imagine the worldwide outcry
if today's German government were still holding on to a single synagogue
that was confiscated by the Nazis during the Holocaust!

My hat off to Eilian Williams! I only wish that Armenians would emulate the
righteous activism of this good shepherd whose efforts deserve proper
recognition by the Republic of Armenia, the Church, and Armenians worldwide!
For Publication
President Aliyev talk during London visit
Yesterday the President of Azerbaijan , Ilham Aliyev , delivered a talk in Chatham House
(one of the most influencial research and political analysis organisations in UK) about
the "Foreign Policies of Azerbaijan and its Challenges ". In the Chair was Sir Brian Fall,
former British Ambassador to Russia and the Caucasus who also moderated the meeting.
Attending were a few former Foreign Ministers of UK , heads of the BP, Scholars and
Political Analysts, a large number of UK resident Azeris, the Azeri Press and the
President`s entourage.
The Chairman reminded us that it was exactly 5 years ago to the day that Mr Aliyev had
delivered his first Address , here in Chatham House , on the 13th of July and that maybe
13 was a good omen for him ; then invited the guest to the podium .
Mr Aliyev talked at great lenght about the healthy economic situation in Azerbaijan and
the improvement of conditions in the life of each Azeri. He described , with pride, to what
" good use" that newly gained wealth was allocated - health, education, social services
and housing of the refugees - and explained that all these changes had been made
possible by the daily production of a million and half barrels of oil, the sale of the enormous
supply of natural Azeri gas to its neighbours and the many contracts drawn for the sell of
these commodities, the latest having been signed , " just this morning" with BP.
This picture of bliss, wealth, good health and "education for all" (he mentioned that each
child in each Azeri school had a personal computer) was so encouraging , optimistic and
rosy that one could not help but wondering why where there so many Azeris living in abject
poverty and why 600.000 Azeri refugees were still living in make-shift tents, even after
18 years of Azeri independence and prosperity?
Mr Aliyev spoke of Azerbaijan`s good and friendly relations with its neighbours Turkey,
Russia and Georgia . He then turmed to Armenia and Karabagh . Of Armenia, he said that
meetings and talks were being held but "always the hindering factor had been the unresolved
dispute in Karabagh " , that " peace was necessary to the region" and that " the international
community (he mentioned the UN, the OSCE and the EU) were in total agreement with the
Azeri authorities ": the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan had to be preserved.
When asked about Azerbaijan`s relations with Turkey, he said that Turkey was their friend,
that he had frequent meetings with Messrs Erdogan and Gul and that he had been given the
reassurance that " the borders with Armenia will never be opened, unless Karabagh is
returned to its rightful owner and Azeri land is evacuated". He also mentioned that the borders
had been closed by Turkey, as a gesture of solidarity with Azerbaijan "when Armenia
invaded Azerbaijan".
Asked " if Azerbaijan will refrain from military action and remove its arsenal from the borders
of Karabagh to achieve peace in the region ", he replied " if we do that , then Armenia will
have no interest or incentive in a peace agreement" .
Then he realised the gaffe he had made! But it was too late: everyone had understood what
President Aliyev had meant : " peace can be achieved only by war".
Replying to the question " shouldn't the Karabagh authorities be also included in the
negotiations " he replied : " it is the duty of the Armenian Authorities to tell us that , and if
that becomes the case, then they ( the Armenians ) should resign and withdraw from the talks".
This statement generated great interest and some perplexity : " if Armenia was to withdraw
from the negotiations , then was Azerbaijan to negotiate with Karabagh itself?
He then said that "the Azeri population of Karabagh must also participate ."
To the quotation by the British-Armenian All-Party Parliamentary Group`s representative that
" the Karabagh dispute is not a Territorial Issue but a Human Rights Issue" the President,
angrily , lined-up all the accusations about Armenian agression and gave an Azeri, self-written
account of the historic events and arguments which place Karabagh within Azerbaijan . He
also said that he was prepared to grant the largest autonomy to Karabagh but ONLY under
Azeri rule .
Asked about his opinion of Iran`s nuclear proliferation and if he had congratulated
Mr Ahmadinejad , he did not reply to the first question but said that yes, he had congratulated
Mr Ahmadinejad after his election .
Replying to the question " is it difficult for you to walk in the steps of your father , the late Heydar
Aliyev" , the President replied that he was proud of what his father had achieved and concluded
by saying that he was implementing the projects created by his father and that in the six years
of his tenure , he had brought prosperity and progress to his people .
Outside Chatham House, protesters were distributing leaflets, asking Mr Aliyev to release
Emin Milli and Adnan Hajizade from jail . In their leaflet one can read :
" ........ German Ombudsman for Human Rights , Gunther Nooke says : here ( in Azerbaijan)
victims are turned into perpetrators and that is a typical sign of a working dictatorship.This case
shall have a negative impact on German-Azerbaijani relations .
Nevertheless the contract with BP has been signed.
Odette Bazil

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Worrying signs in latest OSCE negotiations‏


White House Documents and Publications
July 10, 2009
Joint Statement on the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 10, 2009

Joint Statement on the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict
by U.S. President Obama, Russian President Medvedev, and French
President Sarkozy at the L'Aquila Summit of the Eight, July 10, 2009.

We, the Presidents of the OSCE Minsk Group's Co-Chair countries
France, the Russian Federation, and the United States of America
affirm our commitment to support the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan
as they finalize the Basic Principles for settlement of the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

We are instructing our mediators to present to the Presidents of
Armenia and Azerbaijan an updated version of the Madrid Document of
November 2007, the Co-Chairs last articulation of the Basic
Principles. We urge the Presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan to
resolve the few differences remaining between them and finalize their
agreement on these Basic Principles, which will outline a
comprehensive settlement.

Fact sheet

The ministers of the US, France, and Russia presented a preliminary
version of the Basic Principles for a settlement to Armenia and
Azerbaijan in November 2007 in Madrid.

The Basic Principles reflect a reasonable compromise based on the
Helsinki Final Act principles of Non-Use of Force, Territorial
Integrity, and the Equal Rights and Self-Determination of Peoples.

The Basic Principles call for inter alia:

--return of the territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh to
Azerbaijani control
--an interim status for Nagorno-Karabakh providing guarantees for
security and self-governance,
--a corridor linking Armenia to Nagorno-Karabakh;
--future determination of the final legal status of Nagorno-Karabakh
through a legally binding expression of will;
--the right of all internally displaced persons and refugees to return
to their former places of residence; and
-- international security guarantees that would include a peacekeeping
operation.

The endorsement of these Basic Principles by Armenia and Azerbaijan
will allow the drafting of a comprehensive settlement to ensure a
future of peace, stability, and prosperity for Armenia and Azerbaijan
and the broader region.
ANKARA WELCOMES STATEMENT BY OSCE'S KARABAKH MEDIATORS
ArmInfo
2009-07-13 13:15:00

Ankara has welcomed a joint statement by OSCE MG co- chairs made at
the L'Aquila Summit of the Eight, July 10, 2009.

According to the Turkish media, the statement of Turkey's Foreign
Ministry says: "The impression we got up to today is that the
principles mentioned constitute a general framework. The presence
of some nuances in the approaches of the two sides concerning these
basic principles should be considered natural," the ministry said,
adding that what matters is the quick completion of negotiations
on these basic principles in order to reach a peaceful resolution
of the dispute which has continued to be a "bleeding wound for both
Azerbaijan and Armenia and for the South Caucasus region for years."

To recall, the presidents of OSCE Minsk Group made a joint statement
on Nagorno Karabakh where they urged the presidents of Armenia and
Azerbaijan to resolve the few differences remaining between them
and finalize their agreement on these basic principles. In their
turn, the basic principles include: return of the territories
surrounding Nagorno- Karabakh to Azerbaijani control; an interim
status for Nagorno-Karabakh providing guarantees for security and
self-governance; a corridor linking Armenia to Nagorno- Karabakh;
future determination of the final legal status of Nagorno-Karabakh
through a legally binding expression of will; the right of all
internally displaced persons and refugees to return to their former
places of residence; and international security guarantees that would
include a peacekeeping operation.
Interfax, Russia
July 10 2009
ALIYEV AGREES TO MEET WITH SARGSYAN IN MOSCOW - DIPLOMAT

Azeri President Ilham Aliyev has agreed to meet with his Armenian
counterpart Serzh Sargsyan in Moscow on July 17, Yury Merzlyakov,
Russia's co-chairman of the OSCE Minsk Group, told a briefing on
Friday.

"We hope that this meeting will allow us to reach the last lap [of the
settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict]," Merzlyakov said.

"We continued to discuss this small number of still unresolved aspects
in the basic principles both in Baku and Yerevan," the Russian
diplomat said.

The co-chairmen of the OSCE Minsk Group are very pleased with the
results of their meetings with the Azeri and Armenian presidents,
Merzlyakov said.

"Our conversation with them was substantial and constructive. We
sensed that they both are committed to achieving results at their
upcoming meeting,"
he added.

"We hope that on July 17, the presidents will be able to finalize this
stage and to simultaneously begin discussing a new topic, which, until
recently, we addressed only in general. I hope that we will debate
this issue more profoundly in the future," said the Minsk Group's
French co-chairman Bernard Fassier.

"We are hopeful that the presidents will approve the basic settlement
principles before the end of the year, which will be a
breakthrough. Starting from next year, this breakthrough will open up
opportunities to transform these principles into a fundamental
agreement," the French diplomat said.

Nagorno-Karabakh's ethnic Azeri community could also be allowed to
join these negotiations
, Merzlyakov said.

(what about the Artsakh Armenians?)
"If the Azeri party wants to include representatives of the Azeri
community of Nagorno-Karabakh in its delegation, it is possible. Talks
between the presidents are in progress today, but it is not yet clear
at what stage Nagorno-Karabakh should join the talks in order to be
able to help formulate a part of an agreement dealing with this
territory
," he said.

It could be possible to combine the Helsinki Final Act's three
principles, which suggest: abandoning threats to use force, observing
territorial integrity and giving a right to self-determination to the
local population, the OSCE Minsk Group's U.S. co-chairman Matthew
Bryza said, adding that this task would be difficult.

These principles could be combined by striking a balance between them,
which matches the task of finding mutually acceptable ideas in the
future, Bryza said.

The Azeri and Armenian leaders do not plan to sign any document at the
July 17 meeting, Merzlyakov said.

"But it does not mean that it [document] could not be signed there,"
the Russian diplomat said.

No one planned to sign the Moscow Declaration, but the document was
signed, he said.

Merzlyakov, however, declined to say in what form the basic settlement
principles could be adopted by the Azeri and Armenian presidents.


Interfax, Russia
July 10 2009
Armenia-Azerbaijan peace deal not far off - Medvedev:
ACQUILA July 10


L' Russian President Dmitry Medvedev expressed optimism on Friday
about chances for the settlement of the conflict between Armenia and
Azerbaijan over the latter's Armenian- speaking enclave of
Nagorno-Karabakh.
(sounds as if decisions on transfer back have already been made?)

"I have some pretty good expectations about this. It is one of those
conflicts whose resolution process is in the most advanced phase,"
Medvedev told a news conference in L'Acquila, an Italian city that
hosted the G8 summit on July 8-10.

Armenia-Azerbaijan peace deal not far off - Medvedev (Part 2)
ACQUILA July 10

L' Russian President Dmitry Medvedev expressed optimism on Friday
about chances for the settlement of the conflict between Armenia and
Azerbaijan over the latter's Armenian- speaking enclave of
Nagorno-Karabakh.

"I have some pretty good expectations about this. It is one of those
conflicts whose resolution process is in the most advanced phase,"
Medvedev told a news conference in L'Acquila, an Italian city that
hosted the G8 summit on July 8-10.

Medvedev said Armenia and Azerbaijan are in dialogue over the
conflict.

"In my view, they are resolvable points," he said in reference to the
points the two countries are arguing about. "It's not something that
will take decades to solve. So I believe it's possible to achieve a
result there."

Russia and its partners in the Minsk Group, an Organization for
Security and Cooperation in Europe body mediating in the conflict,
"will give all possible help in this," Medvedev said. "But we will
also act on our own because [the Armenian and Azeri presidents] are
coming to one of the presidential events very soon," he said.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Varchapet-in Petk e Kousaktsootioon Steghtsel Vorpes Kaghakakan Henaran‏ - RAG Mamoul (ragmamoul1@gmail.com)


VARCHAPET-IN PETK E
KOUSAKTSOOTIOON STEGHTSEL
VORPES KAGHAKAKAN HENARAN

ՎԱՐՉԱՊԵՏԻՆ ՊԷՏՔ Է
ԿՈՒՍԱԿՑՈՒԹԻՒՆ ՍՏԵՂԾԵԼ
ՈՐՊԷՍ ՔԱՂԱՔԱԿԱՆ ՅԵՆԱՐԱՆ



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Armenian News

ROBERT FISK'S WORLD: YOU WON'T FIND ANY LESSONS IN UNITY
IN THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS
Independent
Saturday, 11 July 2009
UK

At last, I have seen the Dead Sea Scrolls. There they were, under their
protective, cool-heated screens, the very words penned on to leather
and papyrus 2,000 years ago, the world's most significant record
of the Old Testament. I guess you've got to see it to believe it. I
can't read Hebrew - let alone ancient Hebrew (or Greek or Aramaic,
the other languages of the scrolls) - but some of the letters are
familiar to me from Arabic.

The "seen" (s) of Arabic, and the "meem" (m) are almost the same as
Hebrew and there they were, set down by some ancient who knew, as
we do, only the past and nothing of the future. Most of the texts
are in the Bible; several are not. "May God most high bless you,
may he show you his face and may he open for you," it is written on
the parchments. "For he will honour the pious upon the throne of an
eternal kingdom."

The story of the discovery of the scrolls is, of course, well known. An
Arab Bedouin boy, Mohamed el-Dib, found them at Khirbet Qumran in
a cave in what is now the occupied West Bank of Palestine in 1947,
and handed them over to a cobbler turned antiquities dealer called
Khalil Eskander Shahin in Jerusalem; they eventually ended up in
the hands of scholars - mostly American - i n the Jordanian side of
Jerusalem. Then came the 1967 war and the arrival of the Israeli army
in East Jerusalem and... well, you can imagine the rest.

Now, I have to say that I looked at these original texts in the Royal
Ontario Museum in Toronto, a tale that was bound to engender a whole
series of questions, not least of which is Canada's softly-softly
approach to anything approaching controversy. At no point in the
exhibition, jointly arranged with the professional (and brilliant)
assistance of the Israel Antiquities Authority, is there any mention,
hem hem, of the West Bank or occupation. Or how the documents found
there came to be in the hands of the Israelis.

So cautious are the dear old Canadians - who should by now have
learned that concealing unhappy truths will only create fire and pain
- that they do not even mention that "Kando", the first recipient of
the scrolls, was Armenian. Of course not. Because then they would
have to explain why an Armenian was in Jerusalem, not in western
Turkey. Which would mean that they would have to mention the Armenian
Holocaust of 1915 (one and a half million Armenian civilians murdered
by Ottoman Turks).

This would anger Canada's Turkish community, who are holocaust
deniers. And in turn, it would anger the Israel Antiquities Authority,
who do not acknowledge that the Armenian Holocaust ever happened,
there being only one True Holocaust, which is that of the Jews of
Europe. The Jewish Holocaust is a fact, but the Armenian variety -
a trial run for Hitler's destruction of six million Jews - cannot
be discussed in Canada. Nor indeed in America, where Obama gutlessly
failed even to use the word "genocide" last April.

Then we come down to the exhibition itself. Poor old Canadians, they
had to publicise the whole fandango as a form of "unity" - there being
three monotheistic religions, Jewish, Christian and Muslim, geddit? -
but alas, the scrolls are not written in Arabic and the sole gesture
to the Islamic faith is a single 200-year-old illuminated Koran. The
museum bookshop also devotes a small heap of books on Islam to bolster
their claim to "unity". The exhibition, according to the museum's
director, William Thorsell - in a lamentable piece of pseudo prose -
"will launch provocative enlightening inter-faith discussions". Here
I reach for my sick bag.

Because the message of most of the videos showing around the exhibition
(this being the age of multitechnical as well as multicultural
wellbeing) make it clear that Judea and Samaria (the West Bank to the
rest of us) is originally Jewish. And so it was, by God. The poor old
Philistines lived on the sea coast. But when I suggested a swap to a
bunch of Israeli settlers some years ago - to be fair, they roared in
good-humoured laughter at my horrible sugg estion that Israel might
be given to the Palestinians in return for the occupied West Bank -
the idea did not commend itself to them. They wanted Tel Aviv and all
of internationally recognised Israel plus the West Bank. (At the time,
they also wanted to keep Gaza, partly on the grounds - according to
one of them - that this was where Jonah was puked up by the whale.)

No such claims soil the Ontario exhibition. "Words that Changed
the World" is how the organisers coyly entitle their exhibition, "a
once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to see these historical treasures". But
up come the spoilsports, namely the Canadian "Coalition Against Israeli
Apartheid", to suggest that the scrolls, originally in the hands of the
Jordanian Department of Antiquities and the Ecole Biblique Francaise,
were "confiscated and illegally removed by Israel" in 1967. The Royal
Ontario Museum, the protesters say, is showing "looted" property
which it has no right to exhibit. The Palestinian Authority itself
has intervened, arguing that the museum is "displaying artefacts
removed from the Palestinian territories".

(Let us not, O Reader, mention the Elgin marbles, albeit that the
Brits don't occupy Greece.)

So the museum has started to clam up. "We're not granting any
interviews," according to a snotty spokeswoman for this esteemed
institution. I can well see why. The museum claims it has documents
to prove the legality of the exhibiti on. But it won't show them. Nor
will it consult Unesco for its opinion.

Plenty of unity there, of course.

Needless to say, if the Saudi government were to exhibit its Islamic
treasures in Toronto, I doubt very much if it would mention the large
Jewish community that once lived in Arabia. Any more than a recent
Turkish cultural exhibition at the Royal Academy mentioned the - ahem,
ahem again - contribution of the Armenians to Turkish history. Mind
you, given the fact that the photographs of the Dead Sea Scrolls are
infinitely clearer and more decipherable than the originals stared
at by The Independent's Middle East correspondent, I do wonder if
these precious documents really need to be flown around the world.

But I guess it's the same old story: seeing is believing. Providing
you're not a Palestinian or an Armenian or anyone interested in
property rights.
The Monitor (McAllen, Texas)
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune News Service
July 10, 2009 Friday
Armenian victims: Dark past for Turkey
By Peter Balakian, Fredericksburg (Va.) Free Lance-Star
COMMENTARY
HAMILTON, N.Y.


HAMILTON, N.Y. _ The Armenian Genocide continues to hover over
international politics 94 years later. Its ethical force in memory
haunts not only the legacy of the perpetrator, Turkey, but the legacy
of the victims, the Armenian people and the diaspora.

The political intensity surrounding U.S. recognition of the Armenian
Genocide surfaced this past April in President Obama's engagement with
the issue. Having promised as a presidential candidate to acknowledge
as genocide the events that befell the Armenians of Ottoman Turkey in
1915, on visiting Turkey in April, President Obama stopped short of
using the word "genocide" but spoke powerfully to the Turkish
Parliament about the importance of acknowledging dark chapters of
one's past.

"History is often tragic but, unresolved, can be a heavy weight. Each
country must work through its past. And reckoning with the past can
help us seize a better future. I know there are strong views in this
chamber about the terrible events of 1915. While there has been a good
deal of commentary about my views the best way forward for the Turkish
and Armenian people is a process that works through the past in a way
that is honest, open, and constructive."

THE 'G' WORD

Armenians, Turks and the human-rights community awaited April 24, the
date of the president's annual Armenian Genocide commemorative
address, as the international press speculated whether he would use
the word "genocide." When he did not, most Armenians were
disappointed, some bitterly so. Yet Obama's statement was the most
ethically serious, probing statement on the subject ever made by a
U.S. president: "I have consistently stated my own view of what
occurred in 1915, and my view of that history has not changed. My
interest remains the achievement of a full, frank and just
acknowledgment of the facts," and he remembered "the 1.5 million
Armenians" who were "massacred or marched to their death."

To get a sense of how seriously the president acknowledged the
Armenian Genocide, albeit by syllogism, one need only note what he
said on the campaign trail in September 2008: "As a U.S. senator, I
have stood with the Armenianâ??American community in calling
for Turkey's acknowledgement of the Armenian Genocide." In April he
said: "It is imperative that we recognize the horrific acts carried
out against the Armenian people as genocide, and I will continue to
stand with the Armenian-American community in calling for the
government of Turkey to acknowledge it as such."

However, what ensued between the April 6 visit to Turkey and the April
24 address was some secret diplomacy, brokered _ some believe
coercively _ by Turkey with Armenia to create a "road map" to
normalizing relations between the two countries (their common border
has been closed since the founding of the Armenian Republic in
1991). This new diplomacy involves Armenia agreeing to Turkey's
persistent request that there be a historical commission to "decide"
what happened to the Armenians in 1915. To many, and especially those
in the human-rights community, this is an obvious gimmick, by which
Turkey hopes to cast doubt on the scholarly consensus about the events
of 1915 for the purpose of continuing to deny its responsibility for
the genocide.

OWNING UP TO THE PAST

The irony spills into absurdity. The Turkish government spends
millions of dollars a year on PR firms and lobbyists in a campaign to
rewrite the history of the Armenian extermination. Turkey's courts
have prosecuted writers and intellectuals who acknowledge the Armenian
Genocide, most notably Nobel laureate Orhan Pamuk, who not only stood
trial for it but has been a target of death threats. Most tragically,
the assassination of Armenian Turkish journalist Hrant Dink in 2007
made it clear that dealing openly with the Armenian Genocide in Turkey
was dangerous business.

Turkey has shown no inclination to own up to the truth of its past. In
2004, it agreed to be part of a Turkish Armenian Reconciliation
Commission, but after the arbitrator, the International Center for
Transitional Justice, rendered an assessment that the events of 1915
were genocide, the Turkish government angrily pulled out of the
commission.

Would we allow President Ahmadinejad's government to be part of a
commission on the Holocaust? When countries such as France, Canada,
Poland, Greece, Russia and 15 others (as well as 41 U.S. states)
passed resolutions affirming the Armenian Genocide over the past
decades, they were not attempting to determine history, but rather to
affirm an existing historical record and, in large part, to redress
Turkey's continued aggressive denial campaign.

When Congress once again entertains an Armenian Genocide resolution,
many genocide scholars and the human-rights community hope it will
have the courage to stand up to Turkish pressure. Turkish historian
Taner Akcam has said U.S. acknowledgment of the Armenian genocide
would give the United States "self-respect" in this arena, and "It
would liberate Turks, Armenians, and itself in the process."

It is important that we not confuse the exigencies of diplomacy with
the need to stand firm about the moral reality of genocide and reject
any nation's attempts to cover up a genocidal crime. The history of
genocide is not a poker chip. While Armenia and Turkey must of course
look to the future and normalize relations so that the status of
Nagorno Karabagh and other political and economic issues can be
resolved, Armenia's President Sarkissian has stated that the road to
the future of Turkishâ??Armenian relations should not be
brokered with preconditions.

If Turkey believes in its future leadership in the region, then it
must, in President Obama's words, reckon with its past. Speaking as he
did on Turkish soil, Obama has already done some important work in
helping Turkey understand why acknowledging its past will only aid its
future.

The acknowledgement of the genocide that became a template for Hitler
is not just a Turkish-Armenian affair, but a universal moral issue:
The world's most powerful country can summon the courage to help
resolve it with a congressional resolution in the coming year.

___

ABOUT THE WRITER

Peter Balakian teaches at Colgate University and is the co-translator
of the recently published "American Golgotha: A Memoir of the Armenian
Genocide, 1915-1918" by Girgoris Balakian. Readers may send him e-mail
at PBalakian@mail.cornell.edu He wrote this for the Fredericksburg
(Va.) Free Lance-Star.

ARMENIA EXPECTS TURKEY TO TAKE "PRACTICAL STEPS"
TO NORMALIZE TIES - MINISTER
Armenian Second TV Channel
July 3 2009

Armenian Foreign Minister Edvard Nalbandyan has said that his
country expects Turkey to take "practical steps" as part of previous
arrangements on normalizing ties, the Armenian state-owned Second
TV Channel reported on 3 July. Nalbandyan said this today at a news
conference held jointly with OSCE Chairperson-in-Office and Greek
Foreign Minister Dora Bakoyannis, TV reported.

"Previously Turkey suggested preconditions - one connected with the
settlement of the Karabakh issue, and the other with the process of
recognition of the genocide [killing of Armenians in the Ottoman
Empire in 1915]," Nalbandyan said at the news conference. "Our
arrangement with Turkey when we started the negotiations, when we held
the negotiations, was the following - we came to agreement with the
mutual consent and understanding that we are going to settle these
relations and open the borders without preconditions."

In a comment on the recent statement of the Turkish foreign minister
that Turkey stays committed to the arrangement achieved with Armenia,
Nalbandyan said: "If the Turkish foreign minister made this statement,
one can only welcome it, as the arrangement that was achieved between
Armenia and Turkey was to normalize relations and open borders between
Armenia and Turkey without preconditions. If Turkey is ready to go
ahead with the implementation of these arrangements, one can only
welcome this, and we expect practical steps."

Turkey closed its border with Armenia over the Nagornyy Karabakh
conflict in 1992, and the countries have had no diplomatic ties since.


CENSUS OF POPULATION TO BE HELD IN 2011 IN ARMENIA
Noyan Tapan
July 10, 2009

YEREVAN, JULY 10, NOYAN TAPAN. A decision to hold census of the
population in 2011 in Armenia was made at the RA government July
9 session. According to Stepan Mnatsakanian, the Chairman of the
National Statistical Service, a special committee has been created,
which has already held its first meeting and established the schedule
of actions. He said that test census of the population will be held
before that, in 2010.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The ADLP USA Western District Convention‏

THE ADLP USA WESTERN DISTRICT
CONVENTION RE-ELECTS HAGOP NAZARIAN
AS DISTRICT COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN
ՌԱԿ ԱՄԵՐԻԿԱՅԻ ԱՐԵՒՄՏԵԱՆ ՇՐՋԱՆԻ
87-ՐԴ ՊԱՏԳԱՄԱՒՈՐԱԿԱՆ ԺՈՂՈՎԸ
ԱՏԵՆԱՊԵՏ ՎԵՐԸՆՏՐԵՑ
ԸՆԿ. ՅԱԿՈԲ ՆԱԶԱՐԵԱՆԸ

RAG Mamoul (ragmamoul1@gmail.com)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Armenian News


IWPR

AZERI VISIT TO KARABAKH SPARKS ROW
War of words breaks out as public relations exercise by Baku representatives goes wrong.
By Samira Ahmedbeili in Baku, Sara Khojoian in Yerevan and Anahit Danielian in Stepanakert


A visit by Azerbaijani officials and cultural leaders to the self-declared state of Nagorno-Karabakh was
intended to build ties with its ethnic Armenian rulers, but degenerated into the usual verbal sparring within
days.

However, analysts were wrong-footed by an unusually conciliatory statement from Azerbaijan's president
Ilham Aliev after the trip, in which he appeared sympathetic to some Armenian demands.

Nagorny Karabakh, ruled by Armenians but internationally considered part of Azerbaijan, has been a
block to good relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan since Soviet times.

More than a million refugees fled out of both countries before and during the war, which started in 1991
and ended with a ceasefire three years later. Since then, there have been almost no ties between the
two neighbouring nations, while Karabakh declared independence unilaterally.

Armenian forces control some 14 per cent of what Azerbaijan considers to be its territory, and
exchanges of fire are frequent over the line of control.

The visit to Karabakh, which started on July 3 and was headed by the ambassadors to Moscow of
both Armenia and Azerbaijan, was intended to help ease the tensions.

"I want to stress that neither Armenians nor Azeris are going to fly off into space. We must live together,
and therefore we need to create contacts, joint ties, create mutual respect between each other," Polad
Bulbuloglu, the Azerbaijan ambassador, told reporters in Karabakh.

But, even before he left the region, he had succeeded in offending the locals by following the terminology
used in Azerbaijan to describe Karabakh. He met Bako Sahakian, leader of the self-proclaimed state,
but presented it as just a meeting with local civil society figures, outraging political commentator David
Babian.

"It is unacceptable that non-constructive statements should be made after a visit, as was done by this
Polad Bulbuloglu and his delegates. President Bako Sahakian from the start of the visit held onto the
principal of equality of the two sides, stressing that no other format was acceptable, including the
so-called possibility of holding talks between two communities," the commentator said.

"Such meetings are ineffective, since they once more make people angry, instead of creating an
atmosphere of trust, as the authors insist."

The misunderstandings pursued the delegates, who also visited Yerevan and Baku, throughout their
journey. On returning to the Azerbaijani capital, one delegate told a local news agency that the
Armenian president had told them he understood that Aghdam - a region of Azerbaijan outside
Nagorny Karabakh itself which is almost entirely controlled by Armenian forces - was not Armenian
land, and that he respected Azerbaijan's territorial integrity.

The comments were disowned by a spokesman for the president, and provoked outrage in Yerevan.

"This is an arrogant lie," President Serzh Sargsian's spokesman said. "But we are no longer surprised
that the Azerbaijani delegates distorted the facts when they returned to Baku, since they always do.
The lack of tolerance from Azerbaijani society is clear."

Similar distrust was sparked in Baku, where the supposed peacemakers found themselves suspected
of selling out the interests of their country. Any suggestion that Karabakh is not actually part of
Azerbaijan meets fury in Baku, and Akif Nagi, head of the Organisation for the Liberation of Karabakh,
suggested that by meeting Sahakian, the delegates were effectively recognising his rule.

"As a result of such meetings the fact of the Armenian seizure of Azerbaijan's territory retreats into the
background. By making a statement. about visiting Karabakh through Azerbaijan's territory, they present
this as if it's heroism. But if you meet the head of a separatist, puppet regime, and basically recognise
his legitimacy, then it is unimportant how you got there," Nagi said.

He also expressed disquiet that the delegation had included Mikhail Shvidkoy, the head of the Russian
Cultural Agency, and appeared to have been initiated in Moscow. "The visit of the so-called Azerbaijan
intelligentsia to Karabakh contradicts the interests of Azerbaijan. This visit was conducted at the orders
of Russia. Russia is just demonstrating that the Karabakh conflict is completely under its control and that
it can make the two sides play by its rules any time it wants," he said.

Under the circumstances, therefore, it was not surprising that few observers expected positive results
from the trip. However, comments from President Aliev to Russian television after the visit suggested a
change of heart in Baku, which has previously been uncompromising in its opposition to any recognition
of Armenian rights to Azerbaijan's territory.

"As for the status of Nagorny Karabakh, that is a question of the future. A resolution of its status is not
one of the proposals accepted by us and under discussion at the moment," Aliev told Russia's RTR
television.

"Of course, Azerbaijan will never agree to the independence of Nagorny Karabakh. I think Armenia
understands this. Today we must resolve the results of the conflict and secure an end of the occupation.
The security of all nationalities in Karabakh must be secured, after which communication must be
restored. We understand that Nagorny Karabakh must have a special status, and we see it as being
within Azerbaijan."

Despite Aliev's uncompromising refusal to countenance independence for the region, those were still
remarkably conciliatory remarks by the standards Baku has set since 1991.

"Over the last month there has been a flurry of activity in the Karabakh negotiations: an intense round
of diplomacy, the visit of the intellectuals to Karabakh and the first visit by Armenians to Baku in a long
time, [and] a more positive tone from many of the political leaders," said Tom de Waal, an analyst from
the NGO Conciliation Resources and an expert in Karabakh's history.

"President Aliev adopted a more moderate tone than I can remember in an interview on the Karabakh
issue. I was struck by the way he said that 'we understand the concerns of the people of Karabakh' and
that he said that the status of Karabakh is a 'matter for the future'. Now of course this was an interview
to Russian television. I think things will really change only when the presidents say this kind of thing to a
domestic audience, but it is a very positive signal."

Samira Ahmedbeili, Sara Khojoian and Anahit Danielian are IWPR contributors.
AGOS Weekly Turkish Armenian Newspaper
Stop jerking us around

It has been two and a half years since the murder of Hrant Dink, the founder of our newspaper. The
10th hearing of the trial will be held on 6 July, Monday. We have reached a point where the ‘deep’
will preventing the exposure of the powers behind the murder has managed to block the legal process
of the trial. It has proven impossible to bring the officials who were responsible for the murder or who
acted negligently in the process leading up to it to stand before the court. If, as claimed, the culprits
were only Samast, Hayal, Tuncel and their friends, then the case should have ended long ago.
However, it is clear that, fearing the reaction of the public, the court prefers to extend the case and
stretch out the process. This blockage can only be overcome if the court and the state fulfill their duty
and make the necessary effort to find those responsible.

Charges have not been brought against any of the public officials who were shown, in the reports of
the Prime Ministry Inspection Board or civil inspectors, to be responsible and negligent. Ramazan
Akyürek, the Trabzon Chief Constable at the time of the murder, was promoted to the Head of the
Intelligence Department, making it impossible to illuminate the dark areas of the case. Police officer
Muhittin Zenit, who was aware of all the details of the murder during the telephone call he made with
Erhan Tuncel half an hour after the assassination, was promoted to a position under Akyürek. The
questioning of Colonel Ali Öz was delayed until 18 months after the murder, by which point the
Colonel said he couldn’t remember many details. Celalettin Cerrah, Istanbul Chief of Police and
head of all the officials of the Istanbul Police who, according to the report of the civil inspectors,
“shared responsibility in the murder from the lowest to the highest level,” was appointed Mayor of
Osmaniye. Ahmet İlhan Güler, Istanbul Police Intelligence Department Head, escaped examination
on appeal even though civil inspectors had originally issued permission for him to be examined.
He, too, was appointed to a different post. Ali Fuat Yılmazer, Trabzon Police C Branch Director,
against whom the Prime Ministry Inspection Board report demanded a prior review, was appointed
Istanbul Police Intelligence Branch Head. MIT (National Intelligence Organization) officer Ö.Y.,
allegedly among those who threatened Dink at a meeting at the Istanbul Governorship, was
appointed to İzmir and promoted. At every turn, the requests of lawyers regarding these individuals
were refused by the court or rendered inconclusive because of the officials efforts to cover up the event.

The case drags on and on, but in fact, until necessary action is taken to expose the powers behind
those currently accused (currently accused are Ogün Samast, Yasin Hayal, Erhan Tuncel, Ahmet
İskender, Ersin Yolcu and their friends), the case effectively has not started. This will only extend the
psychological torture that we and especially the Dink family—who were subjected to racist attacks
by the accused and their lawyers throughout the hearings—have already suffered.

To have our consciences held captive like this, to be kept waiting this way, is unbearable for us.
Our hearts cannot take it. We have had enough. We can wait no longer.


ENGLISH ORIGINAL
PRESS RELEASE SENT TO TURKISH NEWSPAPERS 04 JULY 2009
GOMIDAS INSTITUTE, LONDON

Ara Sarafian: “Let's Discuss the Blue Book Face to Face”

On Friday 26th June 2009 Gomidas Institute released its uncensored edition of the 1916 British
Parliamentary Blue Book in Turkish translation. The launch was in Ankara.
A few days later, retired Turkish ambassador and chairman of the Institute for Armenian Research
in Ankara Omer Engin Lutem held a press conference, stating that this publication was part of a
change of strategy by advocates of Armenian Genocide claims. Mr. Lutem argued that now “the
Armenians” intensified their efforts to win over the Turks in Turkey and abroad to have them support
the Armenian theses and that they worked in close cooperation with many Turkish intellectuals to
this end. (Hurriyet, 1 July 2009).

I should say that I have been working in Turkey since the 1990s and enjoy good relations with many
Turkish intellectuals. Reaching out to Turkish audiences is part of a peaceful and democratic process:
Turkish audiences are intelligent enough to listen to alternative views, ask questions and make
informed judgments on critical issues. That is why Lord Avebury and I presented our views on the
Blue Book (and the Armenian Genocide) last Friday and invited questions from all quarters. As for
the recent interest shown by Turkish intellectuals in the Blue Book, which Mr. Lutem refers to as
suspicious “cooperation” with Armenians, such interest was triggered by TGNA and other
spokespersons of the Turkish theses which labeled the Blue Book a fabrication, nothing but a
collection of lies.

The Turkish edition of the Blue Book actually exposes the false claims the Grand National Assembly
made against the Blue Book in a letter to the British Parliament in 2005. The TGNA gave a false
account of the relevant published and archival sources underpinning the Blue Book. It denied the
existence of some key sources, gave misleading accounts of others, and introduced irrelevant issues.
Members of the British Parliament who examined and disagreed with the TGNA position made two
attempts to start a dialogue, but there was no response from Ankara. The Turkish edition of the
uncensored edition of the Blue Book was printed in Turkish so that those TGNA members who have
never seen this work, as well as Turkish audiences interested in the issue, could have access to
relevant materials and judge the Blue Book for themselves.

When the Turkish translation of the uncensored Blue Book was released in Ankara, the meeting
was open to all, including members of the Turkish press and the TGNA. The audience included
people who disparaged the Blue Book and they were allowed to speak. They raised points about
the current Armenian-Azeri conflict, the image of Turkish soldiers during WWI, and Ambassador
Morgenthau as the alleged source for the Blue Book. It would have been good to see members
of the TGNA, retired ambassadors and the head of ERAREN in the audience as well.

I am personally committed to open dialogue, which is why I came to launch the Blue Book in
Ankara and answer all questions from the audience. I wonder if any of my detractors, including
Omer Engin Lutem, would be willing to present and defend their views on the Blue Book in the
same manner? I would like to take this opportunity to invite Omer Engin Lutem and members
of the TGNA who drafted the TGNA petition to London to participate in a public meeting in Istanbul
to discuss their case against the Blue Book as a wartime fabrication.

[For more information about the 1916 British parliamentary report on the Armenian Genocide,
please contact info@gomidas.org or visit www.gomidas.org ]

CULTURE SUPPLEMENT

Three Armenian Monasteries being restored in North Iran:

click on http://riowang.blogspot.com/2008/11/armenian-monasteries-in-iran.html
AN ARMENIAN CANON ! - Hasmik Leyloyan
click on http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TX-6fv3kuJs&feature=related

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Armenian News


RFE/RL Report
Armenians Urged To Vacation In Karabakh
An 18th century fortress in Shushi, Nagorno-Karabakh.
08.07.2009
Lilit Harutiunian

Prime Minister Tigran Sarkisian berated Armenia's travel agencies on
Wednesday for lacking interest in Nagorno-Karabakh and sending
thousands of holiday-makers to Georgia and Turkey instead.

Georgia's Black Sea region of Ajaria has emerged in recent years as
the most popular destination of Armenians going on vacation in summer
months. They are attracted by its seaside resorts and prices that are
often significantly lower than in similar locations in Armenia. A
growing number of Armenians also spend their summer holidays on the
Turkish Mediterranean coast.

Sarkisian publicly complained about that as he met with
representatives of about two dozen local travel operators. He said
they should now pay much greater attention to resorts in Armenia and
especially Karabakh, which is famous for its mountain scenery and
ancient Armenian monasteries.

`If you don't advertise [Karabakh] you will naturally have no
clients,' he said. `People don't even know what opportunities exist
in Karabakh, what the tariffs there are. They don't know that things
are marvelous, service is marvelous there. Why aren't you promoting
[Karabakh] day and night?'

`Kobuleti [Georgia] and Antalya: you advertise them so much that even
a person who will never go there knows about those places,' added the
prime minister.

A representative of Karabakh's tourism development agency present at
the meeting offered the travel agents financial incentives to bring
more Armenian tourists to the disputed region. He said the total cost
of a five-day holiday tour of Karabakh will now range from 70,000
drams ($193) to 110,000 drams per person.

Some of the agents sounded incredulous about the offer, saying that
they have until now dealt with higher travel and accommodation costs
in Karabakh. `Unless we see that [price package] with our own eyes we
won't send any tourists there,' said Ruben Grigorian of the Rumea
travel agency.

`So you should be the first tourists,' commented Sarkisian. It was
decided that a group of travel agents will leave for Karabakh on
Monday to assess the tourism infrastructures and tariffs on the ground.

ARMENIA FM: FOREIGN MINISTER OF AZERBAIJAN IS NOT THE ONE
TO DECIDE UPON THE STATUS OF ARTSAKH
armradio.am
08.07.2009 17:02

On July 8 Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian received the
Co-Chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group, Yuri Merzlyakov, Bernard Fassier
and Matthew Bryza, as well as the Personal Representative of the OSCE
Chairperson-in-Office Andrzej Kasprzyk.

During the meeting discussed were issues related to the preparation
of the forthcoming meeting of the Presidnts of Armenia and Azerbaijan
in Moscow.

Turning to the negotiation process in the framework of the Minsk Group,
Minister Nalbandian stressed the necessity of the full participation
of the Karabakhi side in the process as an effective guarantee of
the peace process.

The Co-Chairs expressed regret that the weather conditions did not
allow them to travel to Stepanakert.

Commenting on Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov's
statement about providing autonomy to Nagorno Karabakh within
Azerbaijan, Edward Nalbandian said the Foreign Minister of Azerbaijan
is not the one to decide upon the status of Artsakh, and the regigh
belongs to the people of Nagorno Karabakh.
WITNESS SAW DINK MURDER SUSPECT AT GENDARMERIE
COMMAND
Today's Zaman
07 July 2009, Tuesday

A witness who testified yesterday in the murder trial of Hrant Dink,
a Turkish-Armenian journalist assassinated by an ultra-nationalist
teenager in January 2007, stated that he saw one of the prime suspects
in the case at the Trabzon Gendarmerie Command before the murder.

The Ýstanbul 14th Higher Criminal Court continued hearing evidence in
the Dink murder trial yesterday. Veysel Þahin, who said he was invited
to Trabzon as a "guest intelligence officer," had seen Yasin Hayal at
the Trabzon Gendarmerie Command during his time there between 2003 and
2005. He also recalled asking a colonel named Þinasi and an intelligent
unit chief called Feridun who Hayal was, and the two men responding,
"He is a good kid."

Suspects Ogun Samast, Erhan Tuncel, Yasin Hayal, Ahmet Ýskender and
Ersin Yolcu, as well as Hrant Dink's wife Rakel, daughter Delal and
brother Orhan Dink, journalist Adalet Aðaoðlu, former head of the
Ýstanbul Bar Association Yucel Sayman, journalists Ali Bayramoðlu,
Oral Calýþlar and Yavuz Baydar and a delegation of lawyers from the
Paris Bar Association attended the trial yesterday.

The court also heard another witness, Mesme Havva, who was at the crime
scene on the day of the assassination. Havva told the court that she
was working at a store not far from the crime scene and said she was
walking to a nearby bank on the day of the murder when she heard a
gunshot which led her to believe that her friend walking next to her
was shot.

She said when she saw that the person who was actually shot was
Hrant Dink, a personal acquaintance as he was a frequenter of
the store where Havva works, that she heard Dink yell out, "I've
been shot." The witness said there were two people and continued,
"The second time, they shot his head, he turned around. I asked the
one who pulled the trigger 'why did you shoot him, son?' He waited,
perhaps to make sure that he was dead, and then that one ran off."

Havva also said she tried to help Dink up to get him to a hospital
after she was shot, but that people at the scene told her not to
touch Dink's body until the prosecutors arrived. Havva also said she
testified to the police twice, once before hit-man Ogun Samast was
captured and another time after that, saying she had identified one
of the suspects in the line-up she had been shown by the police.

She said at the time of the shooting, she saw someone standing aside
when Samast was pulling the trigger, and noted that he started to run
together with the hit-man, adding that one of the two ran into a girl
holding a purse, who mistakenly thought they were purse snatchers.

During yesterday's session, Havva was asked to identify Samast in the
room one more time. She replied, "Yes I think this was him. I can't
be too sure, his face was all wrapped up because it was winter,"
at which point Samast started to laugh. The witness, agitated by
Samast's reaction, angrily retorted, "What are you laughing at?" The
presiding judge ordered silence in the courtroom.

Havva also said she had been fired by her boss and her husband had
stopped talking to her because she has been standing as a witness in
the trial.

When asked to identify the second person at the scene she pointed her
finger at Hayal, another one of the primary suspects in the murder
case. Hayal, who spoke after being singled out as the second person
at the crime scene, started his words saying he was sorry about his
earlier aggressive behaviors in the court. He denied the witness'
testimony, saying that the police had established the validity of
his alibi that he was in Trabzon at the time.

Presiding Judge Erkan Canak read out loud an affidavit by witness Mesut
Oz, in which the witness said he had seen Ogun Samast and another man,
who he said was "short and round," stand and watch Dink for a long
time, standing next to a lamppost outside a cafe where Dink and he
were having coffee three or four days before the murder. Oz wrote
that he identified Samast on the television the day of the murder,
but said he did not see the other man on television.
ECONOMIC SLUMP IN ARMENIA MAY EXCEED 16%
PanARMENIAN.Net/
07.07.2009 12:10 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenian Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan said economic
slump in the republic may exceed 16%.

"The slump is conditioned by problems in construction industry,
which has a multiplicative impact on all other sectors of economy,"
Mr. Sargsyan said during "Impact of the Global Crisis on Armenia:
Short- and Long-run Perspectives" international conference.

"We expect deterioration in the coming months but the situation may
improve by the yearend," he said.

The economic slump in Armenia made 15.7% during the period from
January to May. The slump in construction industry reached 56.1%.
ARMENIA'S BUDGET DEFICIT TO BE COVERED BY WB, IMF,
ADB AND RUSSIAN CREDITS
/PanARMENIAN.Net/
07.07.2009 14:56 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenia's State Budget deficit will be covered
due to allocations from World Bank, International Monetary Fund,
Asian Development Bank, as well as the Russian credits, RA Finance
Minister Tigran Davtyan said today during a press conference devoted to
"Global Crisis Impact on Armenian Economy: Long-term and Short-Term
Prospects", "Negotiations with all four parties are over, and
relevant international structures have already adopted decisions,"
he said. Negotiations with ABD which started early this year have
already finished. This creates a strong guarantee for funding the 2009
budget, he said, adding that half of IMF resources and some amount
of the Russian credits will be used for covering the 2010 budget. "We
are already considering prospect for fulfilling next year's budget,"
he said.

Even the investments above will not decrease Armenia's external
debts. "After attracting all the resources, our debts will still
remain at risk," Mr. Davtyan noted, adding that volumes in that
context will increase, but because Armenia had good base indices at
the beginning of the year (13%), the 2010-11 credit programs will
lower the specific weight of Armenia's external debts to 30-38% in
relation to GDP (external debts with 50% specific weight are at the
highest risk). "Such debt is acceptable and controllable," he said.

Budget deficit will be funded by Asian Development Bank ($80 million)
and World Bank (about $50 million), Russian credits ($ 50 billion)
and International Monetary Fund ($ 150 million).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Armenian News


RFE/RL Report
Armenians Urged To Vacation In Karabakh
An 18th century fortress in Shushi, Nagorno-Karabakh.
08.07.2009
Lilit Harutiunian

Prime Minister Tigran Sarkisian berated Armenia's travel agencies on
Wednesday for lacking interest in Nagorno-Karabakh and sending
thousands of holiday-makers to Georgia and Turkey instead.

Georgia's Black Sea region of Ajaria has emerged in recent years as
the most popular destination of Armenians going on vacation in summer
months. They are attracted by its seaside resorts and prices that are
often significantly lower than in similar locations in Armenia. A
growing number of Armenians also spend their summer holidays on the
Turkish Mediterranean coast.

Sarkisian publicly complained about that as he met with
representatives of about two dozen local travel operators. He said
they should now pay much greater attention to resorts in Armenia and
especially Karabakh, which is famous for its mountain scenery and
ancient Armenian monasteries.

`If you don't advertise [Karabakh] you will naturally have no
clients,' he said. `People don't even know what opportunities exist
in Karabakh, what the tariffs there are. They don't know that things
are marvelous, service is marvelous there. Why aren't you promoting
[Karabakh] day and night?'

`Kobuleti [Georgia] and Antalya: you advertise them so much that even
a person who will never go there knows about those places,' added the
prime minister.

A representative of Karabakh's tourism development agency present at
the meeting offered the travel agents financial incentives to bring
more Armenian tourists to the disputed region. He said the total cost
of a five-day holiday tour of Karabakh will now range from 70,000
drams ($193) to 110,000 drams per person.

Some of the agents sounded incredulous about the offer, saying that
they have until now dealt with higher travel and accommodation costs
in Karabakh. `Unless we see that [price package] with our own eyes we
won't send any tourists there,' said Ruben Grigorian of the Rumea
travel agency.

`So you should be the first tourists,' commented Sarkisian. It was
decided that a group of travel agents will leave for Karabakh on
Monday to assess the tourism infrastructures and tariffs on the ground.

ARMENIA FM: FOREIGN MINISTER OF AZERBAIJAN IS NOT THE ONE
TO DECIDE UPON THE STATUS OF ARTSAKH
armradio.am
08.07.2009 17:02

On July 8 Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian received the
Co-Chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group, Yuri Merzlyakov, Bernard Fassier
and Matthew Bryza, as well as the Personal Representative of the OSCE
Chairperson-in-Office Andrzej Kasprzyk.

During the meeting discussed were issues related to the preparation
of the forthcoming meeting of the Presidnts of Armenia and Azerbaijan
in Moscow.

Turning to the negotiation process in the framework of the Minsk Group,
Minister Nalbandian stressed the necessity of the full participation
of the Karabakhi side in the process as an effective guarantee of
the peace process.

The Co-Chairs expressed regret that the weather conditions did not
allow them to travel to Stepanakert.

Commenting on Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov's
statement about providing autonomy to Nagorno Karabakh within
Azerbaijan, Edward Nalbandian said the Foreign Minister of Azerbaijan
is not the one to decide upon the status of Artsakh, and the regigh
belongs to the people of Nagorno Karabakh.
WITNESS SAW DINK MURDER SUSPECT AT GENDARMERIE
COMMAND
Today's Zaman
07 July 2009, Tuesday

A witness who testified yesterday in the murder trial of Hrant Dink,
a Turkish-Armenian journalist assassinated by an ultra-nationalist
teenager in January 2007, stated that he saw one of the prime suspects
in the case at the Trabzon Gendarmerie Command before the murder.

The Ýstanbul 14th Higher Criminal Court continued hearing evidence in
the Dink murder trial yesterday. Veysel Þahin, who said he was invited
to Trabzon as a "guest intelligence officer," had seen Yasin Hayal at
the Trabzon Gendarmerie Command during his time there between 2003 and
2005. He also recalled asking a colonel named Þinasi and an intelligent
unit chief called Feridun who Hayal was, and the two men responding,
"He is a good kid."

Suspects Ogun Samast, Erhan Tuncel, Yasin Hayal, Ahmet Ýskender and
Ersin Yolcu, as well as Hrant Dink's wife Rakel, daughter Delal and
brother Orhan Dink, journalist Adalet Aðaoðlu, former head of the
Ýstanbul Bar Association Yucel Sayman, journalists Ali Bayramoðlu,
Oral Calýþlar and Yavuz Baydar and a delegation of lawyers from the
Paris Bar Association attended the trial yesterday.

The court also heard another witness, Mesme Havva, who was at the crime
scene on the day of the assassination. Havva told the court that she
was working at a store not far from the crime scene and said she was
walking to a nearby bank on the day of the murder when she heard a
gunshot which led her to believe that her friend walking next to her
was shot.

She said when she saw that the person who was actually shot was
Hrant Dink, a personal acquaintance as he was a frequenter of
the store where Havva works, that she heard Dink yell out, "I've
been shot." The witness said there were two people and continued,
"The second time, they shot his head, he turned around. I asked the
one who pulled the trigger 'why did you shoot him, son?' He waited,
perhaps to make sure that he was dead, and then that one ran off."

Havva also said she tried to help Dink up to get him to a hospital
after she was shot, but that people at the scene told her not to
touch Dink's body until the prosecutors arrived. Havva also said she
testified to the police twice, once before hit-man Ogun Samast was
captured and another time after that, saying she had identified one
of the suspects in the line-up she had been shown by the police.

She said at the time of the shooting, she saw someone standing aside
when Samast was pulling the trigger, and noted that he started to run
together with the hit-man, adding that one of the two ran into a girl
holding a purse, who mistakenly thought they were purse snatchers.

During yesterday's session, Havva was asked to identify Samast in the
room one more time. She replied, "Yes I think this was him. I can't
be too sure, his face was all wrapped up because it was winter,"
at which point Samast started to laugh. The witness, agitated by
Samast's reaction, angrily retorted, "What are you laughing at?" The
presiding judge ordered silence in the courtroom.

Havva also said she had been fired by her boss and her husband had
stopped talking to her because she has been standing as a witness in
the trial.

When asked to identify the second person at the scene she pointed her
finger at Hayal, another one of the primary suspects in the murder
case. Hayal, who spoke after being singled out as the second person
at the crime scene, started his words saying he was sorry about his
earlier aggressive behaviors in the court. He denied the witness'
testimony, saying that the police had established the validity of
his alibi that he was in Trabzon at the time.

Presiding Judge Erkan Canak read out loud an affidavit by witness Mesut
Oz, in which the witness said he had seen Ogun Samast and another man,
who he said was "short and round," stand and watch Dink for a long
time, standing next to a lamppost outside a cafe where Dink and he
were having coffee three or four days before the murder. Oz wrote
that he identified Samast on the television the day of the murder,
but said he did not see the other man on television.
ECONOMIC SLUMP IN ARMENIA MAY EXCEED 16%
PanARMENIAN.Net/
07.07.2009 12:10 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenian Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan said economic
slump in the republic may exceed 16%.

"The slump is conditioned by problems in construction industry,
which has a multiplicative impact on all other sectors of economy,"
Mr. Sargsyan said during "Impact of the Global Crisis on Armenia:
Short- and Long-run Perspectives" international conference.

"We expect deterioration in the coming months but the situation may
improve by the yearend," he said.

The economic slump in Armenia made 15.7% during the period from
January to May. The slump in construction industry reached 56.1%.
ARMENIA'S BUDGET DEFICIT TO BE COVERED BY WB, IMF,
ADB AND RUSSIAN CREDITS
/PanARMENIAN.Net/
07.07.2009 14:56 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenia's State Budget deficit will be covered
due to allocations from World Bank, International Monetary Fund,
Asian Development Bank, as well as the Russian credits, RA Finance
Minister Tigran Davtyan said today during a press conference devoted to
"Global Crisis Impact on Armenian Economy: Long-term and Short-Term
Prospects", "Negotiations with all four parties are over, and
relevant international structures have already adopted decisions,"
he said. Negotiations with ABD which started early this year have
already finished. This creates a strong guarantee for funding the 2009
budget, he said, adding that half of IMF resources and some amount
of the Russian credits will be used for covering the 2010 budget. "We
are already considering prospect for fulfilling next year's budget,"
he said.

Even the investments above will not decrease Armenia's external
debts. "After attracting all the resources, our debts will still
remain at risk," Mr. Davtyan noted, adding that volumes in that
context will increase, but because Armenia had good base indices at
the beginning of the year (13%), the 2010-11 credit programs will
lower the specific weight of Armenia's external debts to 30-38% in
relation to GDP (external debts with 50% specific weight are at the
highest risk). "Such debt is acceptable and controllable," he said.

Budget deficit will be funded by Asian Development Bank ($80 million)
and World Bank (about $50 million), Russian credits ($ 50 billion)
and International Monetary Fund ($ 150 million).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

FATHER FRANK’S RANTS - STAKES AND GALLOWS


Rant Number 354 9 July 2009

Hearing a vicar say that he wants to see the heads of the thieves who have robbed his church on stakes outside is unusual. Yet, the Metro newspaper quoted a Kent priest, the Revd Jim Field, as declaring that much. After 20.000 pounds worth of lead was nicked from the church roof.

‘I know as a man of the cloth I should not be saying this, but that is what I think’, he allegedly averred. I admire him for his sincerity. Here is a brother cleric who is no hypocrite. Rara Avis indeed.

To be fair, that kind of bloodthirsty sentiment is not new. The German poet Heinrich Heine once expatiated on what would have made him happy. He did not wish for much. Waxing lyrical about it, he spoke of a little cottage in the country. With cows providing fresh milk. Bread. A pretty garden with flowers outside. That sort of thing. Lovely, modest and frugal. However, Heine added: ‘To make my happiness complete, really perfect, I would also like to see a few of my enemies hanging from gallows outside my window. I would never ask for more.’

Before expressing dismay at such views, I would beg you to pause and reflect. Do a little examination of your feelings. Introspect. Above all, be honest with yourself. Don’t say what you think you should be saying, what other people expect you to say. Instead, say what you really feel. As for myself. I seem to hear a little voice inside me: ‘Fr Frank, would you really mind seeing the bishops of London and Truro, plus a few other priests and the occasional layman, swinging gently from gallows outside your little hut? More than that, would you not actually enjoy the sight? Come on, be honest with yourself. Tell the truth!’

I also hear another wee voice: ‘Fr Frank, not only you would enjoy that, confess it. You might also like to be the hangman yourself. And to tighten the noose around your enemies’ necks so that the agony last a little longer...’

Enough! Lucifer’s voice is getting unduly garrulous. (Mind you, it would take me more than just a cottage to make me happy.) A Christian has to square any feelings of revenge with the Gospel. Here is Christ’s voice: do not requite evil for evil, love your enemy, turn the other cheek, forgive 70 times 7, and so on. Are Revd Jim, Revd Frank and all the clerical rabble deaf? The stock Catholic answer that the Lord’s words in the Sermon on the Mount are not commands but counsels will not wash. Nor will the sharper point that they refer not to grave physical injury but to personal insults. First, clergymen, ordained to the ministry of the altar, have a special obligation to be Christ-like. Second, personal insults are exactly what is harder to forgive. The whole history of duelling testifies to that. So, Christ’s burning words cannot be so easily evaded.

For centuries the Church drew a distinction between soul and body. ‘Do not fear those who destroy the body. Fear rather he who can destroy both body and soul in hell’, says the Lord. Thus, it was all right to consign heretics and criminals to the secular arm, the State authorities, for execution. God was going to look after the sinner’s soul, anyway. Nothing wrong with having the thieves’ heads on stakes, then – their souls might still make it into Heaven, Deo Volente. For the believer, the next world is what matters most, surely.

A respectable argument. That it has lost credibility in the contemporary world’s eyes constitutes our stupid world’s indictment. But Christ’s words apply to both this world and the next. Hence the dominical challenge will not go away.

It could get worse. ‘The good I want to do I fail to do. I do instead the evil I do not want to do’, St Paul writes in a letter to the Christians at Rome( Romans: 7,19.) Note how the Apostle does not speak of mere feelings. That is important. How a man you be responsible for his feelings? They come upon you often unbidden and unwanted. The sin lies in giving way, or assenting to them, when they are illicit. But St Paul talks of actions. A much tougher paradox. One familiar to another poet, the Latin Ovid. Video meliora proboque, deteriora sequor. ‘I see the better ways, and I approve of them, but I follow the worse’. The plight of the person who knows what is right and assents to it, yet finds himself doing the opposite. A fatal weakness of the will. Well-known to old Aristotle. But the pagan Greek could offer no remedy, while St Paul, that great Jew, joyfully discovered, after much agonising, that the answer lies in mystical union with Christ. Trouble is, what if you are not a mystic?

In spiritual matters neat, pat solutions will not do. Forgiveness, real forgiveness, will always be a tremendous gauntlet. And not only for Christians. A Muslim friend once told to me how awed he was by Muhammad’s famous Taif episode, when the Prophet forgave his persecutors. ‘I doubt I’ll ever be able to live up to that’ he confessed. Maybe ‘forgive your enemies’ works like a Zen koan, a riddle. But not like an intellectual or mathematical one, like finding the solution to an equation. A Zen riddle has no logical, rational answer. It must be lived through, sweated through, suffered through. The solution can only be arrived at after months, years of the most arduous physical and spiritual training. Sometimes perhaps suddenly, in a fulgurating flash of intuition bestowed from on high. Then the answer will not be bookish. It will be a felt, lived one. It will become part of you. And it will endure.

What about those who cannot or will not forgive? I am thinking of a clergywoman whose relative was killed in the 7/7 London terrorist bombings four years ago. She resigned her post, because she found she was unable to forgive. Harrowing. But how could I condemn her? There, but for the grace of God, go I.

Revd Frank Julian Gelli

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ov Vjaroum E` Na El Badviroum E‏

ARTICLE BY YEVGENY GOURGHINIAN
(A PENSIONER FROM YEREVAN)
ՅՕԴՈՒԱԾ ԵՎԳԵՆԻ ԿՈՒՐՂԻՆԵԱՆ-ԷՆ
(ՀԱՅՐԵՆԻ ԹՈՇԱԿԱՌՈՒ)



RAG Mamoul (ragmamoul1@gmail.com)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Armenian House Backgammon Tournament - 26 July 2009‏

ARMENIAN HOUSE LIMITED

25 Cheniston Gardens, Kensington

London W8 6TG

Telephone: 020 7937 6916

ՆԱՐՏԻ ՄՐՑՈՅԹ

Հայ Տունը կը ծրագրէ կազմակերպել նարտի մրցոյթ որը տեղի ունենալու է Հայ Տան մէջ, Կիրակի՝ 26 Յուլիս 2009 յետ միջօրէի ժամը 2.00 էն մինչեւ 6.00։

Մասնակցիլ փափաքողները բարի ըլլան հեռախօսել Հրաչին նախ քան 17 Յուլիս 020 8949 3374 եւ կամ Հայ Տան 020 7937 6916 ու պատգամ թողեն երիզի վրայ տալով իրենց անունը եւ հեռախօսի թիւը։

Մասնակձութիւնը ձրի

Backgammon Tournament

Armenian House is planning a backgammon tournament to take place in Armenian House from 2.00 to 6.00 pm on Sunday, 26th July 2009.

Would all those who wish to participate please call Hratch on 020 8949 3374 not later than 17th July or alternatively, call 020 7937 6916 and leave a message on the answering machine giving name and contact number.

No entry fee

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Senate Committee vote on aid to Armenia - July 9th. Call Chairman Inouye today!‏


Senate Committee vote on aid to Armenia - July 9th. Call Chairman Inouye today!
Dear Reader
The Senate Appropriations Committee will be voting on the foreign aid bill on Thursday, July 9th.

As you may remember, earlier this year, Pres. Obama followed in the tradition of Presidents Clinton and Bush in calling for a 38% reduction in aid to Armenia, and increase in aid to Azerbaijan and breaking parity in military assistance to Armenia and Azerbaijan. The House Appropriations Committee in June voted to send $48 million in aid to Armenia, $10 million to Nagorno Karabagh and maintain military aid parity between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

Please take a moment to contact Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Daniel Inouye and encourage him to support $70 million in assistance to Armenia, $10 million to Nagorno Karabagh and maintain military assistance parity to Armenia and Azerbaijan. Contact information and a sample phone script are provided below.

And please, let us know that you have made your call and the response that you received.
With Regards,
Raffi Karakashian
ANCA Legislative Affairs team
1711 N Street NW
Washington, DC 20036

Please Call Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Dan Inouye (D-HI)
Phone: 202-224-7363
Please ask to leave a message for Chairman Inouye.

Sample Phone Script:
Hello, I am ________________ and I am calling about the foreign aid bill.

I urge you to enhance Section 907 of the Freedom Support Act to ensure that U.S. military aid is not sent to Azerbaijan in light of its threats of renewed war against Armenia and Nagorno Karabagh. We should not reward a government that vows to wage war against an ally.

I urge you to maintain proper support for Armenia, which continues to be a reliable and democratic ally in the region. In the face of an ongoing and illegal blockade by Turkey and Azerbaijan, I'm asking that aid to Armenia be at least $70 million, which it has traditionally received.

Also, I urge you to provide $10 million in development aid to Nagorno Karabagh, which will help rebuild that region that has consistently held democratic, internationally-monitored elections. We should end both the outdated restrictions on development assistance to Nagorno Karabagh and U.S. contacts with Nagorno Karabagh. There should be open lines of communication between U.S. and Karabagh government officials.

Thank you for your support for Armenia.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Interview With Edvard Antinyan - HRAK Deputy Chair‏

INTERVIEW WITH EDVARD ANTINYAN
(HRAK DEPUTY CHAIR)
ABOUT IMPORTANT ISSUES PERTAINING TO
ARMENIAN FOREIGN POLICY

RAG Mamoul (ragmamoul1@gmail.com)


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Armenian News


Sarkisian Signals Frustration With Turkey
Armenia -- President Serzh Sarkisian.
06.07.2009
Sarkis Harutiunian

After months of upbeat statements, President Serzh Sarkisian signaled on
Monday his frustration with Turkey's failure so far to unconditionally
normalize relations with Armenia despite concessions made by him.

`We want to eliminate closed borders remaining in Europe and to build
normal relationships without preconditions,' he said, commenting on
Turkish-Armenian relations after talks with the visiting President
Demetris Christofias of Cyprus. `But in that endeavor, we do not intend
to allow [anyone] to use the negotiating process for misleading the
international community.'

`Unfortunately, in our case, failure to honor mutual agreements leads to
greater distrust and a deeper gap and requires much greater efforts in
the future,' said Sarkisian. He did not go into further details.

Sarkisian and his foreign minister, Eduard Nalbandian, have until now
sounded cautiously optimistic about prospects for the establishment of
diplomatic relations between Armenia and Turkey and the reopening of
their border. Both men have effectively downplayed Ankara's renewed
linkage between Turkish-Armenian reconciliation and the resolution of
the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

The Armenian president has been under fire from his political opponents
over a lack of tangible results in Armenia's unprecedented rapprochement
with Turkey that began shortly after he took office in April 2008. He
faced particularly strong criticism at home and in the worldwide
Armenian Diaspora in late April after Ankara and Yerevan announced a
still unpublicized `roadmap' to normalizing bilateral ties.

The announcement came on the eve of the annual remembrance of more than
one million Armenians massacred by the Ottoman Turks during World War
One. The timing is believed to have made it easier for U.S. President
Barack Obama to backtrack on his pledges to officially recognize the
massacres as genocide.

Sarkisian's harshest critics have accused him of willingly sacrificing
U.S. recognition of the Armenian genocide without securing the lifting
of the 16-year Turkish blockade of Armenia. They have also condemned his
apparent acceptance of a Turkish proposal to form a commission of
historians that would look into the 1915 mass killings and deportations
of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire.


USA AMBASSADOR TO ARMENIA DEFENDS OBAMA
armradio.am
01.07.2009 15:59

The U.S. ambassador to Armenia learned that President Obama's
words do have consequences, as she was peppered with criticism from
Armenian-Americans upset that Mr. Obama is backing off a campaign
pledge to recognize the Armenian "genocide."

On a cross-country tour of Armenian-American communities, Ambassador
Marie Yovanovitch has had to defend Mr. Obama while trying to calm
her listeners who are suspicious of a political double-cross, the
Washington Times writes.

"I know there is disappointment and even anger at President Obama's
April 24 statement," she said at a meeting last week in Arlington,
Mass., referring to Mr. Obama's decision to avoid using the word,
"genocide," in his address on the annual Armenian Remembrance Day.

"But President Obama went further in his statement than any previous
American president. While we must never forget the past, we also must
work together for a better future."

In his remarks, Mr. Obama referred to the "1.5 million Armenians who
were subsequently massacred or marched to their death" in "one of
the greatest atrocities of the 20th century."

However, during the presidential campaign, he pledged to refer to
the tragedy as "genocide."
ARMENIAN GENOCIDE COVERAGE NOW AVAILABLE ONLINE
Western Queens Gazette
July 1, 2009

Cover art from the online exhibition of front-page coverage of the
Armenian genocide by foreign media.

Armenian genocide has always been in the spotlight of foreign
media. Foreign media publications condemning the violence of Ottoman
power against Armenians serve as indirect evidence of the fact that
the Turkish atrocities were, indeed, genocide committed against
Armenians. Global media coverage is vital in that it touches upon
numerous issues concerning Armenian genocide. Especially notable
are English, Russian, French and American coverage and publications
on issues pertaining to Hamidian massacres, Adana atrocities and,
of course, the Genocide of 1915-1922. Publications with photos are
especially remarkable, for they convey valuable information about
genocide as a phenomenon, its process and consequences.

An exhibition of front-page coverage of the Armenian genocide by
foreign media is now available online for the first time. The coverage
of the issue began appearing at the beginning of the 19th century and
continues finding its place in modern-day media publications. These
publications evidence the worldwide response on the Armenian genocide
issue confirming its actuality, importance and awareness among the
international community. The online exhibition presented by the
Armenian Genocide Museum- Institute, although valuable, is only a
modest part of such publications open for new material submissions.

To view the online exhibition, visit
http://genocide-museum.


RFE/RL REport
Thousands Cheer Freed Oppositionists
Armenia -- Opposition members set free in a general amnesty greet
thousands of supporters rallying in Yerevan on July 2, 2009.
02.07.2009
Emil Danielyan

Thousands of people rallied in Yerevan on Thursday to greet senior
opposition figures that have been released from jail in a general
amnesty declared by the Armenian authorities last month.

Former Foreign Minister Aleksandr Arzumanian, former Deputy
Prosecutor-General Gagik Jahangirian and more than a dozen other
oppositions received a hero's welcome as they walked onto a hillside
square in the city center and addressed the enthusiastic crowd that
gathered there.

Opposition leader Levon Ter-Petrosian described their release as a
`great victory' for his Armenian National Congress (HAK) and a
`defeat' for the authorities. Ter-Petrosian again made a case for a
prolonged opposition struggle for leadership change in the country,
as opposed to a repeat of non-stop street protests that followed the
February 2008 presidential election.

`It is thanks to your struggle and European structures that the
authorities have set us free,' parliament deputy Miasnik Malkhasian
said, summing up the main message of speeches delivered by the freed
oppositionists. Malkhasian, who was accused of organizing last year's
post-election violence in the capital along with several other Ter-
Petrosian loyalists, said they will now be `even more resolute' in
challenging the government.

`We have regained freedom not because of the generosity and humanity
of a regime that usurped power and stole the people's vote but
because of unprecedented pressure put by you, the popular movement,
and efforts of international structures,' Jahangirian said.

He said the release of about two dozen opposition members remaining
in prison will now be his `number one objective.' `We promise that we
will have no rest and get no sleep as long as there is a single
political prisoner left in Armenia,' added the controversial ex-
prosecutor, who was sacked and arrested after publicly voicing
support for Ter-Petrosian in the wake of the 2008 election.

Ter-Petrosian too demanded the liberation of the remaining `political
prisoners' and said `nothing has changed in relations between the
authorities and the public' as a result of the amnesty. `On the
contrary, the continuing imprisonment of some political prisoners ...
has further deepened the already huge abyss between them,' he said.


70,000 CARNATIONS TO DECORATE TURKEY-ARMENIA SOCCER GAME
armradio.am
01.07.2009 11:12

Kayseri's Kadir Has stadium, the venue of Turkey's 2010 World Cup
qualifier against Armenia this October, will reportedly be covered
with almost 70,000 carnations for the match, with two carnations
put on each seat in the stadium, which has a capacity of 33,000,
Today's Zaman reported.

Flower Production and Marketing Corporation General Director Mustafa
Erengul said they will decorate the stadium with flowers, which are the
language of love. Stating that the event will help improve relations
between Turkey and Armenia, Interflora Florists Association Chairman
Recep Gedik said his group will help decorate the stadium with flowers,
adding that they plan to visit Armenia with state ministers.

The return game of the September 2008 Turkey-Armenia match will take
place on Oct. 14. Both countries have been awarded a Fair Play award
by FIFA, the world soccer authority, for their contributions to world
peace through the match in Yerevan. Aside from being a sporting event,
the soccer game drew attention for its political ramifications as well.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~