Showing posts with label 19th August 2009. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 19th August 2009. Show all posts

Wednesday, 19 August 2009

Sefilyan:The video was not randomly selected‏

The video was not randomly selected

This particular video was not randomly selected and posted along the call of the committee in support of Sefilyan's right to citizenship.

Sefilyan states, "Ով որ համարձակուի հող զիջելու, նրա գլուխը ջարդելու ենք, տրաքացնելու ենք:"

English translation: "Whoever dares to cease land, we'll smash (crush, crack), explode (burst) her/his head."

These are hardly the words of a sober-minded, circumspect person addressing the public, irrespective of what the volatile sentiments are regarding yet unconfirmed reports of abandoning liberated lands.

Any person in a civilized society uttering such threats either is certified and sent to an institution for an examination and treatment, or taken under custody once sanity is established. If the person holds a responsible public office, then trying for treason is not unreasonable.

Having said so, the matter of citizenship should be uncoupled from a person's conduct. Otherwise, people suffering from mental illnesses that are characterized with grandiose ideas, paranoid delusions, threatening behavior, etc would be stripped from citizenship, or not granted at all. This is counter to basic rights of people anywhere.

Sefilyan's case, granted, is complex. The long and the short of it is that he was "metamorphosed" from being a hero into a villain, and eventually "earned" the status of persona non grata.

His saga and the attitude of consecutive administrations in Armenia raise multiple issues only one of which is related to citizenship.

1. Why the authorities in Armenia and Artsakh, past and present, did not grant a minimum of honorary citizenship not only to Sefilyan but to all those fighters from the Diaspora who put their lives at risk regardless of whether those heroes asked for Armenian/Artsakhian citizenship or not?

2. Subsequent to the war of liberation, it is rumored that Sefilyan was engaged in shady dealings and wheeling. Were those acts qualitatively at par with his heroism in the not so distant past? Why consideration is not provided to this aspect of his life?

3. Sefilyan has children born in Armenia. In most civilized countries, that alone would have constituted a compelling reason to grant citizenship. Are the Armenian authorities so inhumane to separate children from their father? Letting Sefilyan "reside" in Armenia with no clearly defined legal status is simply a band-aid solution. For whatever reason, there remains the potential of being expelled in future.

4. In the extreme case that Sefilyan, in the view of the authorities, has committed treasonous acts, then why he was not tried as such, and frivolous arguments were thrown around, such as possessing a firearm or a combat knife? Who amongst veterans in any country does not cherish to keep memorabilia?

The primary concern here is the principle of granting citizenship and not necessarily Sefilyan as such. In another place, I referred to the well known fact that countries do grant citizenship to mercenaries, let alone to heroes and to one of their kins.

Sefilyan's case is full of stories of betrayals, vendettas, political and PR concerns. It should have not been dragged this long, and should have been handled very diplomatically.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"Kohar" Hamouyti Halebian Yelouytner-ue

FROM OUR CORRESPONDENT IN
ALEPPO, SYRIA
ՀԱԼԷՊԻ (ՍՈՒՐԻԱ)
ՄԵՐ ԹՂԹԱԿԻՑԷՆ

Armenian News

Better relations with Turkey could aid Armenia
The Washington Times
Thursday, August 13, 2009

By Nicholas Clayton

TBILISI, GEORGIA -- Although the process has been slow, the historic
bid to normalize relations between Turkey and Armenia announced in
April has potential to shift regional power balances by giving Armenia
an opportunity to wrest itself from dependence on Russia.

Turkey closed its border with Armenia in 1993 in retaliation for
Armenia's support of an ethnic Armenian secession movement in
neighboring Azerbaijan.

If the Turkish border reopened, landlocked Armenia would have greater
access to trade through ports on the Mediterranean and Black seas, and
would be less dependent on transit through Russia.

"Armenia is a weak country, and it is surrounded by countries that are
either countries that are not friendly or were not friendly up until
very recently," said Masha Lipman, political analyst with the Moscow
Carnegie Center.

"So Armenia found itself with Russia as it's chief protector, but I
don't think this will last for a long time. I think Armenia, like
others, can diversify now," she said.

In April, diplomats from Turkey and Armenia disclosed that two years
of secret diplomatic talks had produced a tentative framework for a
package of sweeping reconciliation measures, including a reopening of
the border and a bilateral commission to investigate what Armenians
have called genocide by the Ottoman Empire, which preceded modern
Turkey.

"Given the history of the relationship between the two [Turkey and
Armenia], if this is real ... it should take a long time. We've only
seen the beginning of it," said Ms. Lipman.

Armenia has maintained a close relationship with Russia since the fall
of the Soviet Union, and Iran has been expanding its economic ties to
the small country.

Ms. Lipman said these relationships have been built out of necessity.

If opened up, Armenia could potentially work toward NATO and EU
integration and could become a major transit country for energy trade
lik ts turbulent relationship with Turkey, however, Armenia's domestic
politics have been an obstacle to strengthening its ties with the
West.

In June, the U.S.-funded Millennium Challenge Corp. cut $64 million
from an aid program aimed at repairing Armenia's crumbling roads. The
corporation's acting director, Rodney Bent, released a statement
saying this was a punitive measure for Armenia, whose actions were
"inconsistent with the eligibility criteria that are at the heart of
the MCC program."

Mr. Bent was making reference to Armenia's May 31 municipal elections,
which -- like the country's February 2008 elections -- were widely
criticized by Western experts and the U.S. Embassy in Yerevan as
fraudulent. With this loss of funds, Armenia turned to Russia and
Iran.

Before the Iranian election crisis, talks were in the works for Iran
to provide funding for the road reconstruction, and Russia announced
this year it would offer a $500 million low-interest loan to Armenia,
which has been hard-hit by the global economic crisis.

"It's a general challenge when countries start to compete for
sponsorship. We saw this from several countries during the Cold War,"
said Ariel Cohen, a senior research fellow at the conservative
Heritage Foundation in Washington.

"I wouldn't be too surprised if Armenia is trying to play this game,
but as long as Turkey and Azerbaijan remain its adversaries, it will
be difficult," Mr. Cohen said.

The biggest obstacle to normalization of ties remains Armenia's frozen
conflict with Azerbaijan over the breakaway region of
Nagorno-Karabakh. Nagorno-Karabakh, whose population is predominately
ethnically Armenian, declared independence from Azerbaijan in
1991. The enclave received direct military support from Armenia as it
fought to secede. Armenia now militarily controls the enclave as well
as about 9 percent of Azerbaijan's total territory outside the
disputed zone.

Karabakh is already labeled as being Armenian territory on many
Armenian maps, but Turkish officials have stated that r he territory's
unrecognized status would be a prerequisite to normalizing ties with
Armenia. Ms. Lipman said changing the status quo, however, is a
mistake.

"No one benefits from this conflict becoming hot instead of
frozen. But any attempt to radically resolve it - any abrupt move, I
think, is very dangerous there," she said.

Nonetheless, during a visit to Turkey in June, U.S. Secretary of State
Hillary Rodham Clinton reiterated her support of Turkish efforts to
resolve the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute.

The other major obstacle to Armenia-Turkey relations involves efforts
to label as a "genocide" a World War I-era pogrom by Ottoman Turks
against ethnic Armenians. An estimated 1.5 million Armenians died in
massacres and forced marches by the Ottoman military.

Turkey says events during its Ottoman predecessor are for historians
to evaluate and that no genocide took place.

Today, 20 countries have officially classified the event as a
genocide, and President Obama said during his presidential campaign
"America deserves a leader who speaks truthfully about the Armenian
genocide."

However, when visiting Turkey in April, he backed away from his
campaign remarks by not using the term "genocide." Mr. Obama later
said that the Congress would not pass legislation for the U.S. to
label the episode a genocide, so as not to not interfere with the
normalization negotiations.

The U.S. State Department declined to clear its Yerevan staff to speak
with the press, primarily because normalization talks with Turkey are
at such a delicate stage, an embassy official said.

On the Turkish side, the normalization negotiations may have an impact
on Turkey's bid to join the European Union.

In Europe, which hosts a large Armenian diaspora, leaders have cited
the genocide dispute as one of several reasons to block its EU
membership bid.

Ms. Lipman, however, denies the two issues are linked.

"It may be a good pretext, but I think the reason [Europe has stalled
Turkey's membership negotiations] goes much deeper," s ion, a strong
economy, a country whose population is growing, as opposed to European
countries, whose populations are going down. It's Muslim, which is
another disadvantage. Again, this isn't very politically correct, but
I'm sure this is regarded as a source of concern for many in Europe."

NOTE: Letters to the Editor of the Washington Times can be sent to
thefollowing email address: yourletters@washingtontimes.com


RFE/RL Trport
IMF predicts 10-15% decline for Armenian economy by yearned

YEREVAN, August 15, /ARKA/. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is
revising its latest forecast that Armenia's economy would decline by
10% by yearend, IMF Resident Representative in Armenia, Nienke Oomes
told ARKA in comments on the decision by Fitch Ratings to downgrade
Armenia's long-term foreign and local currency Issuer Default Ratings
(IDR) to 'BB-' from 'BB' leaving the outlooks stable.

`We are in the process of reconsidering our earlier made forecasts. Of
course we know that Armenia's economy fell year-on-year 16.3% in the
first half of this year, but we also expect the decline to slow down by
yearend,' she said.

However, IMF Resident Representative could not say exactly how much the
economy would fall, saying it would be between 10-15%.

`It is early now to say whether Fitch Ratings' forecast would come
true. As I have said we are reconsidering all available information and
will have to discuss it with the Ministry of Finance and Central Bank
and publish our new forecast in two weeks,' she said.

In June the IMF forecasted that Armenian economy may either fall or
grow, but if it grows it never will be a double-digit. In late June the
IMF Executive Board decided to increase financial assistance to Armenia
from $540 million to $823 million. M.M. -0-

ERDOGAN MET WITH ARMENIAN PATRIARCHATE DIGNITARY
News.am
11:44 / 08/17/2009

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan met with representatives of
Turkish minorities, as well as Orthodox Church Patriarch Bartholomew
and Armenian Apostolic Church Dignitary in Turkey, Archbishop Aram
Ateshyan.

According to Turkish mass media, Patriarchs raised the issues on
national schools and funds. Erdogan promised to undertake reforms to
improve the state of minorities in Turkey.
Government Moves To Boost Road Safety
Armenia -- Traffic police fine a motorist.
13.08.2009
Ruben Meloyan
Prime Minister Tigran Sarkisian ordered police to start enforcing the
use of passenger seat-belts in Armenia in earnest on Thursday as his
government approved a five-year plan to make roads safer for
motorists and pedestrians.

Officials said the program envisages wide-ranging measures, including
the construction of tunnels and pedestrian crossings in the most
dangerous sections of national highways. According to Transport and
Communications Minister Gurgen Sargsian, the World Bank will provide
$10 million for its implementation.

A separate statement issued by the government's press office said the
planned measures will result in a 10 percent decrease in traffic
accidents by 2014. The Armenian police reported last year more than
2,200 accidents that left 407 people dead and 3,125 others injured.

Sarkisian found the statistics alarming as he spoke at a weekly
session of his cabinet. `Our human casualty indicators exceed those
of other countries by several times,' he said. `The main cause of
that is that we don't adhere to safety rules.'

The premier singled out the traditionally widespread non-use of seat-
belts by Armenian car drivers and passengers. `You are obliged to
require your drivers to fasten seat-belts that are almost not used
now,' he told top government officials. `It would be good if the
police started from themselves. Police officers must use seat-belts
so that they can have a [moral] right to demand the same from other
motorists.'

`There is nothing shameful about using seat-belts. It's the opposite
that is shameful,' he added, challenging a long-standing perception
among local males.

Hovannes Hunanian, a deputy chief of the national police attending
the government meeting, agreed, saying that he will issue a
corresponding instruction to the traffic police later in the day.
`We, police officers, must start doing that so others follow our
example,' he told RFE/RL.

Sarkisian said that improved road safety is also essential for
strengthening Armenians' broader respect for laws. `Law and order in
the country starts from maintaining road safety rules,' he said.
`When citizens see that those rules are not respected, they treat the
state accordingly.'
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A picture can lie, but a face doesn't‏

The week's Selection of Keghart:

A picture can lie, but a face doesn't By Raveena Aulakh

Charles Aznavour: Ils sont Tombés (They Fell) By Charles Aznavour - A video-clip

Afghanistan and the new great game John Foster, The Toronto Star

Revealing Genocide Documents Found in Ottoman Archives By Harut Sassounian,

Statement in Support of Intellectual Freedom and Integrity of Research in Armenian Studies Armenian Weekly

Is citizenship now defined by the colour of your skin? By Christopher Hume

Climate Change / Global Warming By Prof. Hovhanness I. Pilikian (Short Video Clips)


FATHER FRANK’S RANTS - The Islamist

Rant Number 359 16 August 2009


Once the priest stood outside a West London mosque, enjoying a bit of a spat with a moon-faced, zestful young man. All about his notion of a resurgent Islamic caliphate. ‘Pie in the sky’ I told him, insensitively. ‘Just as likely as bringing back Byzantium.’ After calling me a ‘kafir’ he turned away, to harangue someone else. ‘Go with God’, I wished him, and quickly forgot the meeting. Until one day in April 2003 when I recognised the boy’s chubby face in the papers. His name was Asif Hanif. He had blown himself up in a bar in Israel. Huh! I thought. ‘I have met Britain’s very first suicide bomber. Fancy that.’ I even felt impelled to write a letter to The Times, reflecting on the boy’s motivation. It got me a few irate messages from readers who thought the poor priest was condoning suicide bombing. Wot! Me? Too much of a pussycat for anything remotely resembling that, believe you me.

Now once again I have been reminded of wretched Asif. Thanks to Ed Husain’s The Islamist, purchased second-hand in a Chiswick Oxfam bookshop. A book rather fascinating for me to peruse, as I happen to know quite a few of the characters in it, Asif being one of them. (I myself am conspicuous by my absence: dommage!) It is a critique of radical Islamic & Islamist bodies in Britain and elsewhere. Hizb UtTahrir – the party of liberation – being the chief among them. A story based on the writer’s personal experience. Meaty stuff. And not without its entertaining bits, like the one about the fiery Muslim activist who boasts of his preference for Balkan blonde concubines. Anyway, I trust the author means well. Still, I have a bone to pick with him.

‘This book is a protest against political Islam’, the preface boldly states. Which immediately caused me to wonder what Ayatollah Khomeini would have thought. You see, while visiting Iran recently I learnt of an instructive anecdote about the father of the Islamic revolution there. Many years before the Shah’s overthrow, the head of Savak, the feared secret police, had paid Khomeini a visit. Aware of the Imam’s high religious status, as well as of his influence with the masses, in order to deter him from attacking the regime, the shrewd Savak boss tried an unusually insidious argument. ‘You are a man of God. A spiritual person. Why do you want to soil yourself by meddling into politics? Politics is dirty. Politics is devious. Politics is corrupt. Politics is mendacity. Lies. Badness. Imam, leave politics to us. We can dirty our hands. But you should keep yourself clean from political filth. So, it is best for you if you leave politics to us.’

Khomeini’s terse response however was not quite what the secret policeman expected: ‘All of Islam is politics.’ Indeed, in another context Khomeini noted how the Qur’an contains a hundred times more verses concerned with social and economic matters than with matters of ritual, prayer, diet and so on. And that cannot be gainsaid. Of course, tafsir, interpretation, is the next, obligatory step when it comes to sacred texts. Whether the meaning of any contentious verse can be explained away is another matter. But Khomeini’s general point seems irrefutable.

Whilst roundly rejecting political Islam, Ed Husain embraces the more inward, Sufi tradition, which he personally finds congenial. No doubt such approach has won him a good number of friends in Britain. Although we have a state church and a state religion, the influence of Christianity in the public realm is virtually nil. That delights our rulers. Jesus Christ, who triumphantly rose from the grave and redeemed the whole world, is strictly confined to the one hour slot on Sunday morning, followed by coffee and chat with the vicar. They love ‘Churchianity’, an exclusively private, harmless, emasculated and frankly useless type of religion. Islam too will be quite acceptable, providing it turns itself into the Friday, mosque equivalent of the Church of England. In sum, good Muslims are those who underwrite the secularist paradigm – religion as a private affair. Bad Muslims, all the others. Diggit?

Our Ed wields Sufism as a kind of stick to beat Islamists with. However, not all Sufis have been and are quite as quietist and as apolitical as he assumes. In 1453 Sufi dervishes egged on the Turkish armies to conquer Constantinople and the Mevlevi order in Ottoman times took full part in the Turkish military campaigns in Europe. The famed Safavid dynasty in Iran took its name from a Sufi brotherhood which captured Tabriz in 1501. In Sudan, Somalia and Libya Senussi Sufis fought against French and Italian colonialists. In such fraternities, you cannot easily distinguish between religious and political affiliations. Which rather drives a four coach and horses through Ed’s argument. I am glad he found his peace through ‘nice’, spiritual Sufis but he might as well have joined more combative ones.

I shouldn’t be too tough on the author of The Islamist. He strikes me as a decent, civilised and courageous kind of human being. One not afraid of telling the truth about Arab racism, for example, as he found himself in Saudi Arabia seen ‘as an inferior hindi, or Indian. In the racist Arab psyche, hindi is as pejorative as kuffar. In countless gatherings I silently sat and listened to racist caricatures of a billion people by Saudi bigots’, he writes. Having myself lived in the neighbouring, putatively happy state of Qatar, I can aver Ed is right. Racism towards brown-skinned people from the Indian subcontinent and other third world people is rampant in the Gulf. Of course, that is not the teaching of Islam. Just another example how neither Christianity, nor Communism nor Islam can change what I would call fallen human nature.

Shabab is a word Islamists apparently use about themselves. It’s Arabic for ‘the young’. In this case, the lads. Lads who, forgive me, are intrinsically silly, as all youth. Lads who in other times would have found an outlet for their ardours in the Foreign Legion or in monasteries or the Army. Today, in the moral and spiritual wasteland which is present-day Britain, Islamic radicalism, sometimes of the violent variety, offers itself as maybe the main opportunity for silly shabab to inject some daring meaning into their lives.

The solution? Honestly, only philosopher Benedetto Croce’s advice comes to mind: ‘Ya shabab! O youth! Grow older as quickly as you can.’

Revd Frank Julian Gelli

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

FATHER FRANK’S RANTS - The Islamist

Rant Number 359 16 August 2009


Once the priest stood outside a West London mosque, enjoying a bit of a spat with a moon-faced, zestful young man. All about his notion of a resurgent Islamic caliphate. ‘Pie in the sky’ I told him, insensitively. ‘Just as likely as bringing back Byzantium.’ After calling me a ‘kafir’ he turned away, to harangue someone else. ‘Go with God’, I wished him, and quickly forgot the meeting. Until one day in April 2003 when I recognised the boy’s chubby face in the papers. His name was Asif Hanif. He had blown himself up in a bar in Israel. Huh! I thought. ‘I have met Britain’s very first suicide bomber. Fancy that.’ I even felt impelled to write a letter to The Times, reflecting on the boy’s motivation. It got me a few irate messages from readers who thought the poor priest was condoning suicide bombing. Wot! Me? Too much of a pussycat for anything remotely resembling that, believe you me.

Now once again I have been reminded of wretched Asif. Thanks to Ed Husain’s The Islamist, purchased second-hand in a Chiswick Oxfam bookshop. A book rather fascinating for me to peruse, as I happen to know quite a few of the characters in it, Asif being one of them. (I myself am conspicuous by my absence: dommage!) It is a critique of radical Islamic & Islamist bodies in Britain and elsewhere. Hizb UtTahrir – the party of liberation – being the chief among them. A story based on the writer’s personal experience. Meaty stuff. And not without its entertaining bits, like the one about the fiery Muslim activist who boasts of his preference for Balkan blonde concubines. Anyway, I trust the author means well. Still, I have a bone to pick with him.

‘This book is a protest against political Islam’, the preface boldly states. Which immediately caused me to wonder what Ayatollah Khomeini would have thought. You see, while visiting Iran recently I learnt of an instructive anecdote about the father of the Islamic revolution there. Many years before the Shah’s overthrow, the head of Savak, the feared secret police, had paid Khomeini a visit. Aware of the Imam’s high religious status, as well as of his influence with the masses, in order to deter him from attacking the regime, the shrewd Savak boss tried an unusually insidious argument. ‘You are a man of God. A spiritual person. Why do you want to soil yourself by meddling into politics? Politics is dirty. Politics is devious. Politics is corrupt. Politics is mendacity. Lies. Badness. Imam, leave politics to us. We can dirty our hands. But you should keep yourself clean from political filth. So, it is best for you if you leave politics to us.’

Khomeini’s terse response however was not quite what the secret policeman expected: ‘All of Islam is politics.’ Indeed, in another context Khomeini noted how the Qur’an contains a hundred times more verses concerned with social and economic matters than with matters of ritual, prayer, diet and so on. And that cannot be gainsaid. Of course, tafsir, interpretation, is the next, obligatory step when it comes to sacred texts. Whether the meaning of any contentious verse can be explained away is another matter. But Khomeini’s general point seems irrefutable.

Whilst roundly rejecting political Islam, Ed Husain embraces the more inward, Sufi tradition, which he personally finds congenial. No doubt such approach has won him a good number of friends in Britain. Although we have a state church and a state religion, the influence of Christianity in the public realm is virtually nil. That delights our rulers. Jesus Christ, who triumphantly rose from the grave and redeemed the whole world, is strictly confined to the one hour slot on Sunday morning, followed by coffee and chat with the vicar. They love ‘Churchianity’, an exclusively private, harmless, emasculated and frankly useless type of religion. Islam too will be quite acceptable, providing it turns itself into the Friday, mosque equivalent of the Church of England. In sum, good Muslims are those who underwrite the secularist paradigm – religion as a private affair. Bad Muslims, all the others. Diggit?

Our Ed wields Sufism as a kind of stick to beat Islamists with. However, not all Sufis have been and are quite as quietist and as apolitical as he assumes. In 1453 Sufi dervishes egged on the Turkish armies to conquer Constantinople and the Mevlevi order in Ottoman times took full part in the Turkish military campaigns in Europe. The famed Safavid dynasty in Iran took its name from a Sufi brotherhood which captured Tabriz in 1501. In Sudan, Somalia and Libya Senussi Sufis fought against French and Italian colonialists. In such fraternities, you cannot easily distinguish between religious and political affiliations. Which rather drives a four coach and horses through Ed’s argument. I am glad he found his peace through ‘nice’, spiritual Sufis but he might as well have joined more combative ones.

I shouldn’t be too tough on the author of The Islamist. He strikes me as a decent, civilised and courageous kind of human being. One not afraid of telling the truth about Arab racism, for example, as he found himself in Saudi Arabia seen ‘as an inferior hindi, or Indian. In the racist Arab psyche, hindi is as pejorative as kuffar. In countless gatherings I silently sat and listened to racist caricatures of a billion people by Saudi bigots’, he writes. Having myself lived in the neighbouring, putatively happy state of Qatar, I can aver Ed is right. Racism towards brown-skinned people from the Indian subcontinent and other third world people is rampant in the Gulf. Of course, that is not the teaching of Islam. Just another example how neither Christianity, nor Communism nor Islam can change what I would call fallen human nature.

Shabab is a word Islamists apparently use about themselves. It’s Arabic for ‘the young’. In this case, the lads. Lads who, forgive me, are intrinsically silly, as all youth. Lads who in other times would have found an outlet for their ardours in the Foreign Legion or in monasteries or the Army. Today, in the moral and spiritual wasteland which is present-day Britain, Islamic radicalism, sometimes of the violent variety, offers itself as maybe the main opportunity for silly shabab to inject some daring meaning into their lives.

The solution? Honestly, only philosopher Benedetto Croce’s advice comes to mind: ‘Ya shabab! O youth! Grow older as quickly as you can.’

Revd Frank Julian Gelli

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Hay Ousanoghner-ue Tourkagan Sirakhaghi Vorogaytoum‏

ARTICLE BY SONA ARSHUNECI
BRUSSELS, BELGIUM
ՅՕԴՈՒԱԾ ՍՈՆԱ ԱՐՇՈՒՆԵՑԻ-ԷՆ
ՊՐԻՒՔՍԷԼ, ՊԵԼՃԻՔԱ






Armenian News

BAKU DISCLOSES WHAT PEACEKEEPING FORCES IT WANTS
TO SEE IN KARABAKH
Today.Az
15 August 2009 [11:59]

There are still certain differences in the conceptions of the
Armenian and Azerbaijani sides regarding settlement of the Karabakh
conflict, Head of International Relations Department of Azerbaijani
Presidential Administration Novruz Mammadov said in an interview with
Turan news agency.

"Azerbaijan's position remains the same - stage by stage liberation
of occupied territories around Karabakh, and return of displaced
people to their native lands. During the transition period Lachin and
Kelbajar regions must be liberated and a corridor between Karabakh
and Armenia must be created. These processes must be accompanied by
cleaning territories from mines and restoration works. It can take
from 5 to 10 years," Mammadov said.

"Then displaced people must return to Karabakh, and it is necessary to
deploy peacekeeping forces. After the return of 60,000 Azerbaijanis
there and the restoration of situation legal status of Karabakh
can be determined only in the frames of Azerbaijan's territorial
integrity. It can take up to 10 years
," Mamedov said.

He said it is early to speak about exact time now, because it is
not known how the processes will develop. The return of only seven
regions around Karabakh will cause the return of 760,000 people.

"All houses, industrial and social infrastructure have been destroyed
there. Several years will take cleaning the territories from mines,
and the whole process can take 15 to 20 years
," Mammadov said.

Not going into details of renewed Madrid Principles he said that they
are about development of Karabakh's status, i.e. who and when will
take a decision, question on peacekeeping forces, their structure,
placing and question connected with corridor.

He agreed with co- chairs that the sides are close to agreement,
but even a small detail can influence the process of settlement.

"Of course Armenia wants the resolution of legal status at first stage,
but co-chairs agreed that all seven regions around Karabakh must be
returned," Mammadov said.

"Azerbaijan's does not want peacekeepers from neighbor countries in
the peacekeeping forces. It would be better if peacekeeping forces
were from European states and U.S
.," Mammadov said.

He said that it would be appropriate to deploy peacekeepers to the
contact line between Karabakh and nearby regions.

"Status of Karabakh must be determined on the basis of Azerbaijan's
Constitution. It will be determined at the last stage, so nothing
can be said now
," Mamedov said.

In case of successful development of peaceful process communication
will be opened; question on opening of automobile roads will be raised.

"I think Armenia first of all is interested in opening of railway,
because of blockade caused by it itself," Mammadov said.


TURKISH MEDIA "PROTEST" AGAINST DECISION TO DEPLOY
RUSSIAN BASES IN ARMENIA VIA TURKISH TERRITORY
/PanARMENIAN.Net/
15.08.2009 14:53 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ "Russia has several times applied to us with a
request to supply its base in Armenia, but every time we responded
that Turkey can allow Turkey to supply its base in Gyumri only with
non-military products, such as clothes, food etc. We'll never allow our
territory to be used for providing arms supplies to Armenia," Turkish
Foreign Ministry's official representative Burak Ozugergin said in an
interview with Turkish Huriyyet newspaper. "It's an obvious provocation
aimed at breaking friendly relations between Turkey and Azerbaijan."

In the meantime, Turkey's opposition-run independent media have made a
big fuss over the report as they believe Russia supplies those weapons
to Armenia for directing them against Azerbaijan in future. Thus,
Turkish Milliyet reports that Turkey should immediately break off
negotiations with Russia. "Russian arms supplied to Armenia will be
used against Azerbaijan. That's why, assisting Russian military base
is out of the question," today's newspapers report.

Director of Armenian Center for Strategic and National Research Richard
Giragosyan announced earlier that Armenian-Turkish border opening
was first of all advantageous to Russia. That's why he believed the
focus was shifted on Russian-Turkish rather than Armenian-Turkish
rapprochement.

"After Russian-Georgian war, Russia has certain expectations of
Turkey," Giragosyan said, noting in the meantime that Ankara and Moscow
had signed a secret agreement allowing Russia to use Turkey's air
spaces for providing supplies to Russian military base in Gyumry. The
expert, however, did not specify what kind of supply was meant.
7% POPULATION LOSS IN ARMENIA BY 2050
News.am
12:55 / 08/13/2009

Population Reference Bureau (PRB) reports natural population loss
to make 7% in Armenia by 2050. In Georgia and Ukraine the loss will
make 28%, whereas in Azerbaijan - 34%, Swaziland and Bulgaria - 33%
and 35% respectively.

Japan is rated 6th, Moldova - 7th with decrease in population by 25%
and 23% correspondingly. In Belarus, Romania, Bosnia and Herzegovina
the population loss is estimated at 20%, in Serbia - 21%.

Population size in Russia by 2050 will decrease to 110.1
million. According to PRB, population size in Russia by mid 2008
totaled 141.9 million.


ARMENIA - MORE STABLE COUNTRY
News.am
19:11 / 08/14/2009

Under U.S. Foreign Policy magazine's 'The Failed States Index
2009' rating, Armenia took the 101st place among world's unstable
countries. The rankings are made based on 12 criteria. Georgia took
the 33 place, whereas last year it was on 56th line.

The rating breakdown is the following: Russia moved from 72 to 71 line.

Azerbaijan is far behind, ranked 56.

Uzbekistan - 31;

Ukraine - 110;

Tajikistan - 37;

Kyrgyzstan - 42;

Turkmenistan - 59

Turkey-85.

Besides, Georgia is 9th by military intervention, with total USD
$427mln spent for the arms in 2006-2007.

The most unstable is Somalia.

The more unstable the state, the higher its rating is under 'Foreign
Policy'.


TURKISH DIPLOMATS TO LEARN ARMENIAN
Asbarez
Aug 14, 2009

BAKU-Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu has issued an instruction
for all of the nation's young diplomats to learn the languages of
adjoining countries. Besides Armenian and Greek, he has encouraged
them to learn Bulgarian, Arabic and Russian. The tactic is a part of
Turkey's foreign policy principles, which emphasize "zero problems
with neighboring countries."

According to Davutoglu, young diplomats who are deemed qualified will
be sent to certain countries in order to learn the languages. However,
as a result of the nearly non-existent diplomatic relations between
Turkey and Armenia, the aforementioned young envoys will have no
choice but to be sent to another country to learn the language.

The initial approximation is that 30 diplomats will be chosen for
the task.

RFE/RL Report
Armenia's Credit Ratings Downgraded
14.08.2009
Emil Danielyan
A leading international risk assessment agency lowered Armenia's debt
rating by one notch late on Thursday, citing the severe impact of the
global recession on the local economy.

In a statement cited by the AFP news agency, Fitch said it has
downgraded Armenia's long-term foreign and national currency Issuer
Default Ratings to `BB-` from `BB.'

`The severity of the shock has materially weakened Armenia's credit
fundamentals and medium-term prospects," Andrew Colquhoun, the
director of Fitch's Sovereigns Group, was quoted as saying.
`Unlocking Armenia's economic potential and restoring strong and
sustained growth necessary to reduce poverty and raise incomes will
be much harder as a result of the crisis.'

Fitch had given the country `BB' ratings, indicating `stable
outlooks' for the local monetary system, in early March. The economic
crisis has deepened since then.

Official statistics show the Armenian economy contracting by 16.3
percent in the first half of this year. The Armenian government says
the full-year decline will ease to 12 percent thanks to its anti-
crisis measures largely endorsed by the International Monetary Fund
and the World Bank.

Fitch was more pessimistic on that score, predicting a GDP drop of 15
percent for 2009. That, it said, is `the third-worst outcome expected
for any Fitch-rated sovereign.' It argued that the South Caucasus
country is highly dependent on external financing and large-scale
remittances from its citizens working abroad.

The downgrading of Fitch's ratings, which assess the capacity of a
borrower to repay its debts, came after Armenia received over $1.1
billion in emergency loans from the IMF, the World Bank and other
foreign sources to cope with the fallout from the global credit
crunch. The authorities in Yerevan hope to attract hundreds of
millions of dollars in additional loans in the months to come.

Their 2009 borrowing has nearly doubled Armenia's external debt,
raising concern about their ability to managed the increased debt
burden. The authorities insist that the country will have little
trouble servicing the debt, arguing that it was equivalent to just 13
percent of GDP last year. A senior World Bank official cautioned last
month, however, that successful debt servicing will require improved
tax collection and renewed economic growth.


Azeris Questioned Over Eurovision Vote For Armenia
Russia -- Armenian Eurovision entrants Anush and Inga Arshakian
perform at the Russian party held in the Euro-House, Moscow, 14May2009
14.08.2009
Karine Kalantarian

Law-enforcement authorities in Azerbaijan have reportedly tracked
down and interrogated local residents that voted for Armenia in this
year's Eurovision song contest.

Singers from both South Caucasus nations competed in the finale of
one of Europe's most popular television shows that took place in
Moscow on May 16. The winner of the annual competition was decided by
a jury of music industry specialists formed in each of the
participating nations and millions of TV viewers voting by phone or
by SMS.

Armenia gave one out of 12 maximum points to an Azerbaijani duo that
finished third in the contest. Although the Armenian entry, performed
by sisters Anush and Inga Arshakian, scored zero points in
Azerbaijan, it appears to have been liked by some Azerbaijanis.

At least one of them, Rovshan Nasirli, was summoned on Wednesday to
the Ministry of National Security in Baku and told to explain why he
voted for his country's arch-foe. `They said that is important for
state security,' Nasirli told RFE/RL's Azerbaijani service. `They
interrogated and subjected me to psychological pressure.

`They were saying, `What kind of a guy are you?' `Don't you have a
nationality?' `Why did you vote for Azerbaijan?' and so on. I
replied, `If Azerbaijani deputies can go to Armenia, then why can't
ordinary citizens vote for a song they like?''
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~