THe European Parliament fails to draw up an objective report on Turkey
The Oomen-Ruijten report flouted the Accession Partnership criteria
and the requirements of the Neighbourhood Policy
Strasbourg, May 21st 2008 – The European Parliament gathered in plenary
session voted today the report prepared by Mrs Oomen-Ruijten (Conservative,
Netherlands) on the Turkey’s 2007 progress report and its 28 tabled amendments.
From a general point of view, the resolution focuses its critics on Turkey’s delays
to fulfill its reforms commitments, especially those regarding the State of Law,
democracy, legislative reforms and the minorities’ rights. The resolution claims
that “additional delays” in the implementation of these reforms “will seriously affect
the rhythm of the negotiations”.
Regarding the various aspects of Turkey’s denial policy, the MEPs failed to
produce an objective report which gives a fair decision on European Parliament’s
positions already established on the Armenian genocide, and this in spite of the
strong positions expressed by a great number of MEPs during the debates.
They have also adopted an amendment tabled by the MEPs supporting Turkey’s
interests (Cem Özdemir, Joost Lagendijk – Greens) which aims at minimizing the
blockade on Armenia exerted by Turkey for 15 years.
“The Oomen-Ruijten report failed to show the reality of Turkey; it proved once
again that regarding the Armenian genocide the European position is well established
on denial, as is the candidate country’s. It waters down even the Parliament’s
position regarding the blockade on Armenia by being in flagrant contradiction with
the Accession criteria and the requirements of the Neighbourhood policy:
the Oomen-Ruijten report cannot contribute to a real dialogue between the
Union and Turkey”, declared Hilda Tchoboian, the chairperson of the European
Armenian Federation for Justice and Democracy.
Referring to the article 301, in spite of the unanimous requirements for abolition
made by the Turkish and European civil societies, the report is satisfied with
indicating “that is of the view that the abrogation of the 301 article would be
the best solution”, and considering the cosmetic reform of this article as “a first step”.
The European Armenian Federation reminds that the slight reform of the 301 article
deceived the European public opinion, and offended the Turkish defenders
of Human Rights, the first victims of this iniquitous law which remains unchanged
after so many years of governmental promises.
“The compromising of the Oomen-Ruijten report with a law that penalizes a right
so fundamental that is the freedom of expression for Europe will not help the
Turkish democratic forces to upgrade their society”, commented Hilda Tchoboian.
“What the European societies demand from the European Parliament, is to
express in its reports more transparent positions, the truth on the situation of
Human Rights and democracy in Turkey: it is regrettable that the report diffuses
a screen of smoke in order to hide from the public opinion the seriousness
of Turkey’s breaches in these fields, yet necessary for the examination of the
integration of this country in the European Union”, concluded Hilda Tchoboian.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
KARABAKH FOLLOWS IN KOSOVO'S STEPS
by Ivan Preobrazhensky, Aleksei Bausin
DEFENSE and SECURITY
May 21, 2008 Wednesday
Russia
Bringing in 500,000 Armenians, Karabakh authorities intend to get
international recognition
WILL NAGORNO-KARABAKH ARRANGE ITS OWN TALKS WITH AZERBAIJAN?; Official
Stepanakert maintains that it itself should negotiate peace settlement
with Azerbaijan.
Nagorno-Karabakh President Bako Saakjan is convinced that
Nagorno-Karabakh should participate in the pace settlement talks with
Azerbaijan. "Independent Nagorno-Karabakh Republic is the principal
warring side. It has the priorities analogous to those of another
countries," Saakjan said. All negotiations have been conducted by
Armenia these last 14 years. Nagorno-Karabakh only participated in
the truce signing in 1994.
Gegam Bagdasarjan, the only oppositionist deputy on the Karabakh
parliament, suspects that the Nagorno-Karabakh authorities might
have been upset by rumors that Armenia was ready to give part of the
Karabakh territories to Azerbaijan to settle the matter.
Not even Armenia has established diplomatic relations with
Stepanakert. Azerbaijani settlements in Karabakh are in ruins,
Armenian thrive with help from diasporas abroad.
The army comprises approximately one sixth of the population. Economic
revival is undeniable. "Stability will culminate in a doctrine of
maximum density of the population," Karabakh Prime Minister Araik
Arutyunjan said. According to official estimates, the population of
Nagorno-Karabakh stands at under 150,000 men, density of population
amounting to one tenth of the Armenian. The government is out to
stabilize the population at 500,000. Population inflow is double
the outflow. The birth rate is about 14 births per 1,000 people. A
denser population may help with the problem of recognition "as it
did in Kosovo" (to quote Arutyunjan).
Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandjan believes that status of
Nagorno-Karabakh should be determined at a referendum. "Moscow stands
for a compromise reached with help from foreign intermediaries,"
Leonid Slutsky of the International Committee of the Duma said.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~