Showing posts with label 3rd July 2009. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 3rd July 2009. Show all posts

Saturday, 4 July 2009

Armenian News‏

PRESIDENT OF GEORGIA VISITS ARMENIA
armradio.am
25.06.2009 11:02

At the invitation of President Serzh Sargsyan President of Georgia
Mikhail Sahakashvili and Mrs. Sandra Roelofs arrived to Armenia on
June 24 for a two day official visit.

The official ceremony of welcoming the President of Georgia took
place at the Presidential Palace and was followed by the private
meeting of the two Presidents, President's Press Office reported.

The meeting of Serzh Sargsyan and Mikhail Sahakashvili was followed
by the meeting of the delegations in the extended format with.

Noting that few nations in the world can take pride in such
long-lasting and good-neighborly relations as those of the Armenian
and Georgian people, President Sargsyan said "We have inherited these
relations from our predecessors and we must develop them further."

Presidents Sargsyan and Sahakashvili noted that frequent contacts
and negotiations benefit allow to swiftly define issues of mutual
interest as well as to decide on the best avenues for their resolution.

During the negotiations discussed were issues related to the
cargo transportation through the territory of Georgia, transport
connection between Armenia and Georgia, tourism development, as
well as issues related to cooperation in the area of education and
culture. The parties also discussed the issue of demarcation of the
Armenian-Georgian border.

Implementation of joint projects in different are as and making
them traditional was viewed by President Sargsyan as an important
means for intensifying the interaction between the two peoples. As
an example of such a joint project he proposed, in particular, to
organize annual Olympiad for schoolchildren on different subjects as
well as sport events. The parties reached the agreement to conduct
the first Olympiad in the fall of this year.

At the conclusion of the meeting, the President of Armenia Serzh
Sargsyan awarded the President of Georgia Mikhail Sahakashvili with
the Medal of Honor, which is the highest state decoration awarded to
foreign citizens.

The medal was awarded in accordance with the June 24 decree of the
President of Armenia for President Sahakashvili's contribution to the
strengthening of the centuries-long friendship of the two peoples and
for the activities directed at the deepening of the Armenian-Georgian
cooperation.

Russian MPs Slam Yerevan For Honoring Georgia's Saakashvili

Georgia -- President Mikheil Saakashvili speaks at the opening of the
Mukhadverdi memorial to Georgian soldiers who were killed during the
August 2008 war with Russia, in Tbilisi, 26May2009
26.06.2009

Two senior members of the Russian parliament strongly criticized
Armenia on Friday for bestowing its highest state award for foreign
dignitaries upon Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili.
Saakashvili received the Medal of Honor from President Serzh
Sarkisian at the start of his two-day official visit to Yerevan on
Wednesday. Sarkisian's office cited his contribution to
`strengthening the centuries-old Georgian-Armenian friendship.'

The move did not go down well with Armenian nationalist activists who
accuse the Saakashvili government of deliberately neglecting the
socioeconomic woes of Georgia's Javakheti region and violating the
rights of its predominantly Armenian population. Several dozen of
them tried to stage a protest on Thursday outside a Yerevan hotel
where the Georgian leader stayed during the trip.

Police used to force to disperse the protesters, many of them young
activists of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation (Dashnaktsutyun)
that stands for granting Javakheti the status of an autonomous
region. `Giving Saakashvili the Medal of Honor was incomprehensible,'
said Giro Manoyan, a senior member of Dashnaktsutyun.

Some Russian politicians seem to have been even more irked by
Yerevan's warm reception of a man vilified by Moscow for his
staunchly pro-Western foreign policy. Valeri Bogomolov, a member of
the State Duma committee on foreign relations affiliated with the
ruling United Russia Party, called it a `very controversial event.'

`Every country is free to award anything to anything,' the Regnum
news agency quoted Bogomolov as saying. `However, it is important to
understand that you can't spit into a water well from which you will
need to drink on more than occasion.'

`The demonstrative granting of a high Armenian state award to the
Georgian president was an untactful and unfriendly step towards
Russia,' agreed Viktor Ilyukhin, another senior Duma member
representing the opposition Communist Party.

Both lawmakers were confident, however, that Sarkisian's gesture will
not inflict serous damage on close relations between Armenia and
Russia. `Russia is a great country which thinks that it should prove
its so-called tolerance everywhere and understands the sometimes
inexplicable actions of our partners,' said Bogomolov.

Speaking at Yerevan State University on Thursday, Saakashvili slammed
Russian policy on both Georgia and Armenia. He claimed in particular
that Moscow showed an utter disregard of `the interests of the
Armenian side' during its August 2008 war with Georgia.

ARMENIA GDP TO CONTRACT 9.5 PCT IN '09 -IMF
By Hasmik Mkrtchyan
Reuters
June 24 2009
UK

YEREVAN, June 24 (Reuters) - GDP in Armenia is projected to contract
9.5 percent in 2009, the International Monetary Fund said on Wednesday,
revising an earlier forecast of 5.0 percent.

The IMF on Monday approved an increase in lending to the former Soviet
republic by $283 million to $823 million, citing a sharp contraction
in economic activity, falling remittances, an increase in unemployment
and difficult conditions in credit markets.

'We project GDP growth for 2009 to be minus 9.5 percent, but there
is a lot of uncertainty and the actual growth could be better or
worse depending on what happens to the world economy and in Russia
particularly,' IMF resident representative Nienke Oomes told Reuters
on Wednesday.

After a period of strong economic growth, landlocked Armenia has
been hit hard by the global economic crisis and the impact of close
economic ally Russia sliding into recession.

In March, the Fund approved a $540 million standby loan arrangement
over 28 months to support the country's 2009-2011 financing gap and
a drop in foreign exchange reserves. It followed the central bank's
decision to float the dram currency.

GDP contracted 15.7 percent in January-May 2009 in comparison with 9.8
percent growth in the same period last year, the National Statistics
Service said this month. The central bank has forecast a contraction
of 5.8 percent this year, citing falling chemical and metal prices
on world markets.

'We project a budget deficit of minus 6.5 percent because there is a
big drop in tax revenues,' Oomes said, adding that the IMF programme
allows the government to maintain expenditures at a level 'close to
the 2009 budget'.

'We believe that during this time of crisis it is appropriate for
the government to increase the deficit to stimulate the economy and
to provide fiscal stimulus while protecting social spending for the
poor,' Oomes said.

(Writing by Matt Robinson; editing by Stephen Nisbet) Keywords:
ARMENIA GDP/
STATE TV READIES TO AIR ARMENIAN
Hurriyet
June 24 2009
Turkey

ANKARA - The signal remains strong for reconciliation between Turkey
and Armenia as the Turkish state broadcaster's head of radio reveals
plans to begin TV broadcasts in the Armenian-language within a year. 'I
sincerely am working for the common future of the two peoples,'
says a member of the broadcasting team.

Just months since it began radio broadcasts in Armenian, state-owned
Turkish Radio and Broadcasting Corporation, or TRT, is now preparing
to launch an Armenian television channel.

According to a source, who declined to be named, initial efforts to
broadcast in Armenian began after a meeting between President Abdullah
Gul and his Armenian counterpart, Serge Sarkisian, last September
when Gul visited Yerevan for a football match between the national
teams of both countries. One team will prepare the television and
radio broadcasts together.

TRT Radio Bureau and Foreign Broadcasts Director Å~^enol Göka
confirmed that Armenian television broadcasts would begin within a
year. Göka refused to provide any details on preparations, but did
say the rate of work was accelerating.

In April, Ankara and Yerevan agreed on a "road map" deal for
U.S.-backed talks leading the way to normalizing ties and opening the
common border, which Turkey closed in a show of support of Azerbaijan
in 1993 after the Armenian occupation of Azerbaijani territories in
the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region.

Armenia accuses Turkey of failing to recognize the 1915-era killings
of Armenians within Ottoman Empire as an act of genocide. Turkey
says hundreds of thousands of both Turks and Armenians died at the
time due to communal violence and wartime conditions, but rejects
allegations of genocide.

"We are ready to normalize relations without preconditions and are
hopeful that Turkey too will take that path, "Foreign Minister Edward
Nalbandian said.

"As for Turkey's part, I can only express hope that Turkey will not
retreat," Nalbandian said in response to a question from an Armenian
reporter at a joint-news conference with Foreign Minister Sheikh
Abdullah bin Zayed al-Nahayan of the United Arab Emirates on Sunday
in Yerevan.

The plan was to launch the radio channel in June but it was
brought forward to April 2 so that broadcasting could begin before
U.S. President Barack Obama's state visit on April 5.

Göka said the decision to launch a radio channel in Armenian was
made about 18 months ago. Broadcasts in Armenian carry a message
to Armenia and the world, said Göka. "We are tackling the common
history of the two nations. We are emphasizing our joint values in
order to strengthen the links between the two people."

Most popular broadcaster

He said TRT was proud to be one of the most popular broadcasters
in Armenia. But, he also criticized the head of the Armenian state
broadcaster, Alex Haroutunian, saying: "He was in Turkey a few
weeks ago and made a statement about how he did not know about TRT's
broadcasts in Armenian. To tell you the truth, I was very upset. The
only thing I will say is that they knew about the broadcasts." The
two signed a deal last year to prepare joint programs.

When asked about the Armenian broadcasts in the Eastern Armenian
dialect, which is used mainly in Armenia rather than the western
dialect used by Turkish Armenians and the Armenian diaspora, Göka
said: "In the beginning, when we decided to launch such a service, our
target audience was Armenia, not Istanbul. We see these broadcasts as a
key to developing good relations with Armenia." Speakers of western and
eastern Armenian dialects are virtually unintelligible to one another.

Göka also said he could not understand all the controversy surrounding
TRT's broadcasts in Armenian, noting that TRT radio broadcasted in
31 different languages. The team in charge of the Armenian broadcasts
has been kept away from the public's eye.

Armenia-born Ernest Margarian is a member of that team. Margarian,
who told the Hurriyet Daily News & Economic Review that he was making
public his identity for the first time, said he had moved to Turkey
in 2004 and decided to settle in Ankara. When asked why he chose
to hide his identity, he said: "I didn't really have a reason. I am
not really doing anything that will attract criticism. I just didn't
want to become a public person." Any potential criticism from Armenia
for what he is doing does not discourage him, he said. "Because I
sincerely am working for the common future of the two peoples."

Armenia Gears Up For Direct Flights To U.S.
Armenia -- A passenger jet belonging to the national Armavia airline.
24.06.2009
Hovannes Shoghikian

Armenia's national airline will likely start first-ever direct
flights to the United States by the end of this year in line with a
U.S.-Armenian `open skies' agreement signed in November, officials
said on Wednesday.
The agreement, which entered into force on June 16, entitles Armenian
and American airlines to operate regular flight services between any
cities in the two countries. They will be free to determine the
frequency of flights, the equipment used, and the prices charged.

Artyom Movsisian, head of the Armenian government's Civil Aviation
Department, told RFE/RL that Armenia's leading carrier, Armavia,
intends to fly to New York and Los Angeles and will soon apply to the
U.S. Department of Transportation for a relevant license. He said a
team of officials from the department's Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) will then arrive in Yerevan to look into
Armenian aviation facilities, safety rules and practices, and their
conformity with international standards.

Movsisian was confident that Armavia will get the green light to
launch the service that will allow thousands of Armenians traveling
to and from the United States each year to avoid lengthy layovers at
European airports. They account for a large part of passengers taking
daily flights between Yerevan and major European cities.

`Unfortunately, all these procedures necessary for the airline to
carry out flights [to the U.S.] are a bit slow,' said Movsisian.
`They could take up to five or six months.'

A spokeswoman for Armavia told RFE/RL that the private carrier, which
presently flies to 26 destinations in Europe, Russia and the Middle
East, is already preparing to acquire a long-haul jetliner for the
transatlantic service. `As soon as we get the permission, we will be
able to have a big plane in our fleet that will carry out those
flights,' said Nana Avetisova.

According to Movsisian, the U.S. side has yet to name an American
airline interested in flying to Armenia.

The U.S. Embassy in Yerevan, meanwhile, welcomed on Wednesday the
entry into force of the U.S.-Armenian aviation agreement. `The
agreement will strengthen and expand the already strong trade and
tourism links between the United states and Armenia, and provide
multi-million dollar benefits to American and Armenian carriers and
the traveling public, while preserving the United States' commitments
to aviation safety and security,' the embassy said in a statement.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Friday, 3 July 2009

Recent articles published by IWPR


GLOBAL CRISIS SQUEEZES LIFE FROM ARMENIA BORDER TOWN
25 June 2009
The global recession has ended a brief era of prosperity and left most people without jobs.
By Sara Khojoian

In the town of Meghri, people can't remember the last time a government official came to see how they
live and to offer help. "They come only on the eve of elections," one person said.

Though situated in the heart of Armenia's mining region, Meghri, near the Iranian border and nearly
400 kilometres from the capital Yerevan, never had any industry or factories itself.

Karine Galstian, who gave birth to her second child only a month ago, is desperate to leave as soon
as she can, because she sees no future for her children in Meghri.

She, her husband and two children, live off his monthly earnings as an electrician of about 65,000
drams (175 US dollars). "We also have a patch of land but we still only barely scrape a living," said
Galstian.

"I want to leave this place, as I see no future for my boys here. There is no hospital, not even a proper
doctor.

"They could have created jobs here, but the crisis took away the ones that once existed."

Galstian knows what she is talking about. Her brother recently joined the growing ranks of the town's
unemployed.

The riverside town of 4,500, ringed by mountains in the Syunik region, is visibly crumbling under the
weight of the fallout from the world economic downturn.

Most locals worked at the two nearby complexes, a copper and molybdenum factory in the town of
Agarak, a few kms away, and at the local gold processing plant based at Lichkvaz-Tey and Terterasar.

These two firms once employed more than 600 staff in total, and while they did, the life of thousands
of Meghri residents - relatives of those 600 workers - improved.

Sirun Sargsyan recalls how jobs in the plants revitalised their remote community, "Seven years ago,
we had only one newly-wed couple in the town to prepare gifts for, while this year we had 32."

But while life for most residents of Meghri improved for several years, in the last few months it has
turned into a bitter struggle for survival.

The first reports spread about the possible closure of operations in the mines of Lichkvaz-Tey and
Terterasar in spring 2008. Then, in September 2008, the management of Tamaya Resources Ltd,
the Australian company that owns the plant, decided to halt the work.

Anthony Ehlers, a representative of the company, told IWPR that the global economic crisis had
made it difficult for Tamaya to attract the outside investment it still needed. For now, the ultimate
fate of the mines remains unknown.

Work at the mines was suspended on June 1, 2008, and in August 2008 the last of the 350-strong
labour force - the guards and drivers - were sent home on leave.

Sergey Tarverdian, a company driver, was one of the last to go. "We barely eke out a living,"
Tarverdian lamented. "There is nothing in Meghri. Nobody cares about us."

Meanwhile the copper combine at Agarak ceased operations in November 2008 and 250 more
workers were suspended.

Geopromining Gold Ltd, owners of the plant, in February and again on June 19, announced that
the plant would resume production but few people in Meghri have faith in that.

Sergey Hayrapetian, mayor of the town, says the crisis facing his community can only be solved
with more active intervention by the state.

"The town budget for this year is simply unrealistic. We were planning to raise about 34 million
drams in taxes, but I don't think we will manage this because the number of unemployed people
keeps growing," Hayrapetian said.

"We have a few small wine producers here, and two private businessmen are producing dried
fruits, but they don't provide work for more than 30 people."

Meghri residents will have to rely on their own fruit and vegetable harvest to generate some cash
if the gold mines and the copper combine do not restart.

But they face another problem with a lack of cold storage facilities. "We've been planning to set
up a refrigeration system so we can buy fruit from country farmers [at harvest time] and store it
until winter, when we can sell the fruit for a higher price," Hayrapetian said.

But they need money for that - money they don't have.

For now, the local cannery buys the crops that generate the town's only income at rock-bottom
prices. Only 20 people work in the cannery in winter, and 50 in summer.

"The fruits in Meghri are something special," said Melsida Baghdasarian. "But who cares?
Their sale price in Kapan [the regional capital] is very low but to drive 400 kilometres to sell
them in Yerevan would cost us a lot, so we're better off throwing them away than going there.

"That's why we have to give them to the cannery for below the real price."

Karine Karapetian, assistant at a store in Meghri, says the economic downturn has left so
many people in debt that her boss has forbidden them to sell anything on credit.

Various customers already owe the store around 1,000 dollars. "Since January, I don't give
anyone anything on loan," Karapetian said.

"We used to do it when people were sure to receive their monthly salaries and could pay their
debts, but now I can't even manage to collect the debts that had accumulated before January.

"I pity them; many people don't know how to get by. They come and ask for bread and
sometimes I think I should give it to them - but then I realise that they have nothing to pay for
it with."

Ashot Qalashian, the deputy mayor, says one way out of the current impasse would be for
the government to act on pledges contained in a decision made in 2000, giving Meghri
so-called border zone status. In theory, this granted it access to certain privileges, exemptions
and government programmes.

"But until now the [programmes] to create jobs, and conditions for the development of small
and medium sized business and storage of agricultural goods have stayed on paper," he said.

Meanwhile, Artyom Sargsyan, of the department of information for Syunik municipality, said
the crisis in Meghri was not even mentioned at a meeting in March during President Serzh
Sargsyan's visit to Syunik.

Repairs to the local house of culture and plans to build a new irrigation system dominated
the discussion instead.

In Meghri, local people still wait for someone in authority to take their problems more seriously.
According to jobless ex-driver Sergey Tarverdian, "We simply live in the hope that there will
one day be light at the end of the tunnel."

Sara Khojoian is a journalist from Armenianow.com, and a participant in IWPR's Cross
Caucasus Journalism Network.

BID TO REPOPULATE KARABAKH FRAUGHT WITH PROBLEMS
19 Jume 2009
Authorities offer incentives for refugees to return, but little grows on their land
and employment prospects are grim.
By Lusine Musaelian in Stepanakert

Henrikh Asrian, a 48-year-old Armenian veteran of the Nagorny-Karabakh conflict, spent months
as a prisoner of war in Azerbaijan, and has now found himself on a new frontline - the authorities'
campaign to repopulate the region.

Karabakh has been ruled by its own, ethnic Armenian, government since it broke away from
Baku's control in the dying days of the Soviet Union. A ceasefire 15 years ago froze the lines
of control, and left hundreds of thousands of refugees displaced.

At least 800,000 Azeris fled eastwards from Armenia and Karabakh, while half a million
Armenians fled in the opposite direction. The government in Karabakh is now trying to encourage
some of those Armenians to settle in its under-populated villages.

Asrian lost his flat in the war and has now been given a small house of his own in the village of
Arachamugh, a remote settlement 30 kilometres from the regional centre Hadrut, which is itself
little more than a village.

"The war ended for me when electricity and neighbours appeared in the village," he told IWPR.

The 18 identical white houses in Arachamugh resemble bee-hives from a distance, but up close
they are comfortable with three rooms, a lean-to shed and 50 square metres of garden for vegetables.

Construction of the village was funded by the Tufenkian Foundation, a private charitable fund set up
by an émigré Armenian, but it fits in with a key objective of the local government, whose control over
Karabakh is not internationally recognised.

In 1989, Karabakh had almost 190,000 inhabitants, of whom more than 40,000 were Azeris.
These all fled their homes, and the population is now officially estimated at under 140,000 people,
almost entirely ethnic Armenian.

The Karabakh authorities are desperate for more people to strengthen their chances of resisting
the Baku government if it sends troops to reclaim the region. Anyone who wants to settle in the
villages receives the cost of moving, a grant for accommodation, free connection to the electricity
network and a grant for purchasing livestock.

Each family can receive as much as 2,700 US dollars in grants, and - especially in light of the
global financial crisis - the gifts have proven attractive.

Sarasar Sarian, chairman of the Union of Refugees of Nagorny-Karabakh, told IWPR that ten
families have moved to Karabakh in the last year for financial reasons alone, and have asked to
be settled in areas where they can receive grants.

"And the people coming are mainly those who left because of the war," he said.

But even this reduced population struggles to get by. Arachamugh is on a flat, bleak plain where
the land is too hard to work in summer, and too cold to work in winter. It was once used to grow
grapes, but the villagers say the vineyards were destroyed in the war and since then nothing has
grown on the spoiled land.

"At first sight, these houses are attractive, but in actual fact it is very hard to live here. People
lack work in the purest sense. The children have nothing to do except school and television.
Even the wildlife is lacking," said Susanna Aghababian, the village elder.

And for families moving in, gaining a house is just the start of the battle. Martik Hayrapetian,
a 42-year-old veteran of the Karabakh war, lives with his wife and five children in Arachamugh
without any source of regular income. In the winter, he looks after the boiler in the local school,
but loses his job when the warm weather comes.

"As a child I did not dream of being a boilerman. That's what life has left me as. Although some
months I receive 20,000 drams (54 dollars)," he said.

Although he lives only 50 metres from the school where he works, some of his younger children
are unable to attend, lacking clothes and shoes.

"My only hope is for credit to buy animals, which the state promised to give out. Let's see. If we
can obtain some livestock, we'll live well. But, as it is, every day my wife and I just look at each
other, and wonder how we will live through the day," he said.

"I am very grateful for my flat but it is just a flat, and how can we live, what can we eat? There is
no work, and the land is bad."

Lusine Musaelian is the Radio Liberty correspondent in Stepanakert, and a participant in IWPR's
Cross Caucasus Journalism Network, CCJN.

The terminology used was chosen by the editors, not the reporter.
HOMELESS IN YEREVAN
12 June 2009
A decade and a half after the fighting ceased, many refugees are still waiting for proper
housing.
By Gegham Vardanian in Yerevan

In a gloomy ex-hostel, built for students at Yerevan's chemistry technical collage but used by
refugees from Azerbaijan, 120 families are still waiting for some kind of decent accommodation.

Amazingly, considering that whole families are crammed into rooms of just 12 square metres,
and are forced to share a toilet with up to 50 people, often this is better than the facilities they
have had in the past.

Some 360,000 of the half-million Armenians who fled Azerbaijan because of the Karabakh
conflict, which ended exactly 15 years ago, ended up in Armenia, and accommodation for them
is still scarce.

Maria Aslanian, a 96-year-old, has lived with her two sons - 67-year-old Viktor and 62-year-old
Vladimir - in one such room for ten years. With its three beds and cupboard, there is barely room
to stand up.

"There was a time when we had absolutely nowhere to live. For four months we had to sleep outside,
in the snow and the rain. It's good that they gave us this place," said Maria, as she sat playing
backgammon with Viktor.

Just down the hall was her neighbour Laura Melkonian, who has lived in the former student hostel
in the Charbakh district of the Armenian capital for 18 years already. She spent years complaining
about the toilets, but has just learned now to accept them as they are.

"Water drips out of the ceiling, it pours out of the plaster, and we have to go in there with an umbrella.
Who knows, maybe one day the ceiling will fall down completely? But what can we do? It is a public
toilet, which 50 people are using," she said.

She has more space than many of her neighbours, since her husband has left her to move to Russia,
and she lives only with her 13-year-old son.

She has separated out a little kitchen area with a curtain, but it is so small that only her arms can fit
inside it. "I am thinking maybe I should leave the country and become a refugee from Armenia," she
mused.

Gegham is the editor of the www.echannel.am website of Internews and a participant in IWPR's
Cross Caucasus Journalism Network.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

FATHER FRANK’S RANTS - Iran’s Cause

Rant Number 353 2 July 2009.

‘Fr Frank, what have you done? After you went to Iran all hell broke loose there!’ an alarmed reader wrote. Huh! I am powerful but not that powerful. Besides, I am as innocent as a lamb. Nonetheless, Iran interests me - deeply. I feel kind of involved in it. Because it is partly run by fellow clergy. Stone me to death, surely a priest cannot object to that per se – it would be unnatural.

‘Iran must choose whether it is a nation like others or a cause.’ One of infamous Dr Heinz Kissinger’s pronouncements. On BBC2, he reiterated it to Jerry ‘Rottweiler’ Paxman. Implication: Iran is bad. Because it waves the flag of Shiism. That feisty branch of Islam especially associated with rebellion and discontent. (Dig now why I sometimes describe myself as ‘an Anglican Shia’? Turbulent priest OK. Praise God for that.) Since the 1978 revolution guided by Ayatollah Khomeini, Iran has scared the wits out of safe establishments both West and East. That is why they armed and backed big bad wolf Saddam Hussain’s war against Iran. Today it is because Iran aids radical Islamic movements like Hezbollah and Hamas. That’s what makes it a threat or ‘a cause’, according to old Heinz. Should Iran jettison its Shia identity and fervour, plus its pursuit of nuclear energy, presumably it would then become ‘kosher’ – oops, sorry, I mean ‘halal’, of course.

Neat, Heinz, but bogus argument. Other nations are causes, too. Like America. In Cairo, President Obama swore democracy promotion everywhere. Groan...since Bush, a cause marred by aggressive military interventionism. Leaving behind a vast trail of blood, like in Iraq, and now ditto in Afghanistan. But those are mere bagatelles. Pace venomous critics like Chomsky, who claim the whole thing is a sham, democracy and human rights remain America’s proud, universal cause.

Or take France. The fanatic values of the French revolution – liberte’, egalite’, fraternite’ – are plugged relentlessly. (Never mind that liberty and equality are incompatible and fraternity impossible.) France banned the mention of God in the European Charter of Fundamental Rights. France, once ‘the most Christian country’, excludes religion. Now President Sarkozy even wants to outlaw the burka, the full Islamic female dress. Because, apparently, it is a threat to cohesion, secularism, the dignity of women, waffle, waffle. Sounds pretty cause-like to me...

Or consider Saudi Arabia. Its banner bears the shahada, the Muslim profession of faith. So that country promotes its chief cause – Islam – everywhere. It funds mosques, schools and Islamic institution all around the world. When Muslims are under attack, the Saudis move to defend them. They have dispatched money, arms and men to fight the Communist Rousskies in Afghanistan and the Serbs in Bosnia. No coyness about the Saudi cause, eh?

Israel. Jews are its worldwide concern. The law of return means any Jew anywhere can emigrate to eretz Israel, his ancestral land. To escape persecution or start a new life or....whatever. Another cause, methinks. (Er...wait a minute: the Palestinians? Forget them. A mere trifle. Soon, they will be gone.)

Britain? Its empire was its cause. And opposition to any other country’s hegemony in Europe. Self-interest, in a nutshell. Empire gone, today’s Britain has yet not found any cause or purpose, other than aping laws and diktats and fashions emanating from Brussels. Plus the constant, shameful, racist harping on the ‘immigration’ dangers. Sic transit gloriae mundi. Sad.

Kissinger’s hostility to Iran is really about ideology. Conducting international relations on ideological premises – the Shia cause - is what he and many others abhor. But his own ideology blinds him to the obvious. There are many, competing ideologies around us – call them human rights, democracy, equality, gays, feminism, free trade, God, globalisation, etcetera. They influence, shape and direct the foreign policies of nations. In the case of the West, often with disastrous effects for peoples of darker skin-colour, like Iraqis and Afghanis. Iran’s cause may be deemed subversive of the established world order but...why is that so bad? What’s so good about the status quo, eh?

As a statesman, Kissinger dominated US foreign policy between 1968 and 1977. His role was especially calamitous vis-a-vis the Vietnam war. This former refugee from Nazism never understood the determination of Hanoi and the Vietcong to fight on for independence and freedom from foreign rule. The mountains of corpses his failed strategies engendered should keep him awake at night, if, improbably, he possesses the thing called conscience.

Iran. Since I came back from Tehran just before the elections, I have received many e-mails from friends I made there. They are overwhelmingly pro-Ahmadinejad. True, the conference I was on was, shall we say, a tad on the conservative side so maybe...it figures. But the memory that sticks in my mind is that of a young couple I met in Meshed, a holy city on Iran’s East. After coming out of the haram, the shrine of Imam Reza. They heard us speak English and so we chatted. Mohamed was a lawyer and Fatima a teacher. Pilgrims from Isfahan. ‘We have God’s rule here’, Mohamed said, ‘that is why we are happy.’ Who did he support in the elections? Ahmadinejad. But, surprise, surprise, Fatima rooted for Mousavi. ‘He would deal with the West better’, she asserted. ‘Iran needs more friends abroad.’ I wonder what they are saying now...

‘Who’d you think the Hidden Imam would vote for?’ I provocatively put to them. ‘God knows’, they reply in unison, seriously. ‘Why are your churches so empty? Are all the Christians dead?’ they in turn demanded. It transpired they both had visited London, staying with friends in Kensington, my former parish. Did they poke their noses inside St Mary Abbots and saw the emptiness? But, had they visited instead Holy Trinity Brompton, they would have witnessed a vibrant, thronged congregation of believers rejoicing in the One True God. ‘You must not buy any lying, smug secularist propaganda. Christianity, like Christ, isn’t dead. It is alive’ I advised them. They looked pleased. ‘Like the Hidden Imam’, they responded, joyfully. Well, why not? Had I known the Farsi word for ‘right’, I would have said it, loud and clear.

Revd Frank Julian Gelli

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Dkhour, Shad Dkhour Daretarts Mue‏

ARTICLE BY HAIG NACCASHIAN
MONTREAL, CANADA
ՅՕԴՈՒԱԾ ՀԱՅԿ ՆԱԳԳԱՇԵԱՆ-ԷՆ
ՄՈՆԹՐԷԱԼ, ԳԱՆԱՏԱ

Armenian Genocide News‏


Dr. Israel Charny Condemns Denial of Armenian Genocide in British Parliament
by Harut Sassounian
30 June 2009
in the Armenian Reporter

In an earlier column I wrote about the special conference held at the British Parliament on

May 7, organized by the British-Armenian All-Party Parliamentary Group. Dr. Israel Charny
and I were invited as guest speakers. I spoke about “The Armenian Genocide and Quest
for Justice.” Dr. Charny could not attend due to illness, however, his prepared remarks were
read by Peter Barker, a former broadcaster of BBC Radio.

Dr. Charny is an internationally-known authority on the Holocaust and the Armenian Genocide.
He is the Executive Director of the Jerusalem-based Institute on the Holocaust and Genocide,
past President of International Association of Genocide Scholars, Editor-in-Chief of
Encyclopedia of Genocide, and author of several scholarly books. Dr. Charny’s lengthy paper
was titled: “Confronting denials of the Armenian Genocide is not only honoring history, but a
crucial policy position for confronting threats in our contemporary world.”

In his remarks presented at the British Parliament, Dr. Charny described the conference on
the Armenian Genocide he attended two years ago in Istanbul. He found “the prevailing
discourse stilted, blocked and rigid with denials.” The overwhelming majority of the statements
were “one-sided rehashes of Turkish denial propaganda; a basic intellectual failure since they
did not even mention or refer to or in any way acknowledge any of the voluminous documentation
and evidences of the Armenian Genocide that are now part of world culture; and a great number
were emotional diatribes rather than ’scientific’ or properly scholarly contributions.”

In his paper, Charny singled out the presentation at the Istanbul conference of Prof. Yair Auron,
his colleague from Israel, who spoke “in a strong resonant voice that there was no question but
that the Armenians had suffered genocide at the hands of the Turks.”

In his London remarks, Dr. Charny’s also discussed the “failure of the State of Israel, but not of
Israelis, to recognize the Armenian Genocide,” expressing his “deep regret and shame” that
Israel (where he lives) and the United States (where he was born), “have failed seriously in
their moral responsibility towards the Armenian people.” He felt “particularly wounded as well as
angry at such failures by my Jewish people when we too have known the worst horrors of being
victims of a major genocide, and therefore we should be all the more at your side as deeply
committed allies in all aspects of preserving and honoring the record of the Armenian Genocide.”

Dr. Charny announced “the happy news [that] the battle for recognition and genuine respect for
the memory of the Armenian Genocide [was won] on the level of everyday Israeli culture.” In great
detail, he explained that “throughout the year there are major statements in our culture about the
Armenian Genocide, including many full-length feature stories and interviews in all of our major
newspapers and on our television. On April 24, there is powerful coverage, for example, this year
on Roim Olam or Seeing the World, a major TV news magazine; there is an annual seminar at
the Hebrew University of Jerusalem at which this year the keynote speaker was Prof. James
Russell of Harvard University, and it was my honor to be the keynoter the year before together
with an influential member of the Knesset who was totally knowledgeable about the Genocide
and totally clear about Israel’s error in not recognizing it; and there is of course an annual
commemoration by the Armenian Community—it was there that the two ministers in the past
announced their recognition of the Armenian genocide. During a too-brief period, we also had
two ministers of the Israeli government who officially recognized the Genocide, and although the
governments in question promptly disavowed these ministers’ statements as private and not
speaking for the country, the records of those ministers honoring the Armenian Genocide on
behalf of the State of Israel cannot be erased. I would say that both the everyday Israeli man on
the street and the professional scholars of the Holocaust, such as Prof. Yehuda Bauer perhaps
the ranking scholar of the Holocaust at Yad Vashem, are basically sympathetic and committed
to paying homage to the Armenian Genocide. A few years ago four of us, including one of the
above former ministers, Yossi Sarid, Prof. Bauer, Prof. Yair Auron, an indefatigable scholar of
the Armenian Genocide and of Israel’s denials of same, and myself traveled together to Yerevan
to lay a wreath at the Armenian Genocide Memorial.”

As he has done many times in the past, Dr. Charny expressed regret that “sadly and shamefully
the pull of practical government politics still leads to official Israel cooperating with Turkey in
gross denials of the Armenian Genocide. No less than the arch fighter for peace in the Israel-
Palestinian conflict, Shimon Peres, now President of Israel, then serving as Israel’s Foreign
Minister, twice went notably out of his way to insult the history and memory of the Armenian
Genocide.”

In a scathing letter, Dr. Charny told Peres in 2001: “You have gone beyond a moral boundary
that no Jew should allow himself to trespass…. As a Jew and an Israeli, I am ashamed of the
extent to which you have now entered into the range of actual denial of the Armenian Genocide,
comparable to denials of the Holocaust.”

In response to a second “especially insulting” denial by Shimon Peres in 2002, Dr. Charny sent
him one of my columns from The California Courier, with the following note: “I am enclosing with
great concern for your attention an editorial in a leading US-Armenian newspaper calling on
Armenia to expel the Israeli Ambassador. For your further information, the author of this editorial,
who is the head of the United Armenian Fund in the U.S.—comparable to our United Jewish
Appeal—was for many years a delegate to the UN Human Rights Commission in Geneva.”

Dr. Charny concluded his London remarks: “I am happy to emphasize that the people and the
culture [in Israel] very strongly recognize and honor the [Armenian] Genocide, and know how
serious and important it is for us and the whole world.” He expressed his sincere hope that
“some day we will succeed in changing the official Israeli government position.”


Turkish Translation of ‘Blue Book’ Released in Ankara
23 June 2009
Armenian Reporter

On Fri., June 26, the Turkish edition of the 1916 “Blue Book,” titled The Treatment of Armenians
in the Ottoman Empire 1915-16, will be released in Ankara by Lord Avebury and Ara Sarafian.
The event is sponsored by the Turkish Human Rights Association (Ankara) and the Freedom of
Thought Association.

On Oct. 12, 2005, Lord Archer of Sandwell QC, Lord Biffen, and Lord Avebury organized a
meeting in Westminster for British parliamentarians to respond to a petition sent to members
of the British Houses of Parliament by the Turkish Grand National Assembly (TGNA) contesting
the veracity of the 1916 British Parliamentary “Blue Book.”

The central thesis of the Blue Book was the argument that starting in 1915, Armenians were
subject to a policy of mass annihilation in the Ottoman Empire. According to the TGNA petition,
the Blue Book was a wartime fabrication that harmed Turkish interests during World War I and
continues to do so today. The petition asserted that the 1916 report had no supporting
documentation; that it was contrived in essence; and that the main compiler and editor of the
report admitted that it was a propaganda tool fabricated against Ottoman Turkey and its German
ally.

The petition insisted that the core of the Blue Book was a set of eyewitness accounts that were
unreliable, and that the work was composed in such a way as to conceal the flawed character of
these key reports. It maintained that withholding the names of some informants and locations,
supposedly to safeguard sources still in the Ottoman Empire, was in reality to conceal the
weaknesses of the reports themselves.

However, a group of British MPs concluded from their own knowledge of the Blue Book and
many contemporaneous accounts by eyewitnesses that have since been published, as well as
from a detailed report from the Gomidas Institute, that: the Blue Book was compiled from first-hand
testimonies that were scrupulously reported by the distinguished editor, Arnold Toynbee; the
supporting documentation has been readily accessible, a point overlooked in the letter from the
TGNA;
Toynbee never said the Blue Book was flawed, as claimed by the petition; the petition wrongly
asserted that the War Propaganda Bureau was the sole source for all information regarding the
situation in the Ottoman Empire, while really there were hundreds of neutral consular officials and
missionaries; the reports by neutrals have been reinforced and corroborated by other United States
and German consular reports, now in the public domain, and by numerous accounts in the diaries
and letters of survivors; and the sources of the 150 eyewitness accounts published in the Blue Book
were not discovered recently in a War Propaganda Bureau document, as claimed by the TGNA,
but have been known and published for many years.

British MPs judged that the TGNA was not properly informed about the Blue Book. Consequently,
on Jan. 27, 2006, 33 MPs responded to the TGNA petition with a letter to the speaker of the TGNA,
Bulent Arinc, inviting TGNA members to a face-to-face meeting with their British colleagues to
discuss the Blue Book. As no response to that letter was received, a second email communication
was sent on Sept. 1, 2006 to all individual members of the TGNA, inviting them to a face-to-face
meeting. Again there was no response.

The British MPs concluded that TGNA members must not be aware of the actual content of the
Blue Book, nor the archival trail associated with it. In order to facilitate better understanding and
reflection, it was suggested that the Gomidas Institute undertake the Turkish translation of their
uncensored edition of the Blue Book, which was replete with discussion and full archival references.
The Gomidas Institute was able to undertake such a project with support from the AGBU, so that
a whole new Turkish readership—not just members of the TGNA—could appraise the Blue Book
issue in an informed and balanced manner.

ENGLISH: James Bryce and Arnold Toynbee, The Treatment of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire,
1915–1916: Documents Presented to Viscount Grey of Fallodon by Viscount Bryce [Uncensored
Edition], edited and with an introduction by Ara Sarafian.

TURKISH: James Bryce and Arnold Toynbee, Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nda Ermenilere Yapılan
Muamele, 1915-1916 Vikont Bryce’ın Fallodon Vikontu Grey’e Sunduğu Belgeler [Sansürsüz Basım],
Gomidas Institute: London and Istanbul, 2009, 654 pp. Yayına hazırlayan Ara Sarafian. Özel önsöz
Lord Avebury.

For more information email info@gomidas.org.


TURKISH 'BLUE BOOK' CRITICIZED
Hurriyet
July 01, 2009 05:40

ANKARA - The recently published Turkish edition of the "Blue Book,"
which voices claims about the Armenian genocide, aims to defeat the
Turkish position from the inside, according to a retired ambassador.

"The Turkish translation of the book is part of a strategy that aims
to make Turkish people advocate the Armenian position, both in Turkey
and abroad," said retired Ambassador Omer Engin Lutem, speaking at
a press conference in Ankara on Tuesday.

"Some of the Turkish intellectuals are thus contacted and meetings
that back the Armenian claims are organized in Turkey by the NGOs and
universities in this respect," he said. "And some publishing houses
in Turkey publish Turkish translations of Armenian or non-Armenian
people's books that advocate genocide claims in line with this
strategy."

The book, "The Treatment of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire, 1915 -
1916," also known as the "Blue Book," was originally published in 1916,
in English, by the British parliament. The central thesis of the book
is that Armenians were subject to a policy of mass annihilation in
the final years of the Ottoman Empire, starting in 1915.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Violence in eastern Anatolia Give up the g-word

Jun 25th 2009
From The Economist print edition

Rebel Land: Among Turkey’s Forgotten Peoples. By Christopher de Bellaigue. Bloomsbury; 288 pages; £20. Buy from Amazon.co.uk

MOST of the people who devote themselves to chronicling the history of Anatolia during the first world war fall into one category or another: those determined to prove that the Armenians suffered genocide, and those determined to prove the opposite. This Manichean split amounts to a “travesty of history and memory”. What is needed is a “vaguer designation, avoiding the g-word but clearly connoting criminal acts of slaughter.”

That is Christopher de Bellaigue’s argument and many people will be shocked by it. How could anyone want to blur the outlines of an unspeakable phenomenon whose precise definition has, in recent years, been of keen concern to liberal internationalists and humanitarian law buffs? What hope is there of stopping genocide if people do not even try to decide what the word means?

But honest readers of this moving and intricately woven look at Turkey’s 20th-century history will surely see his point. By focusing on a single, remote area in the east Anatolian highlands, and describing not only its blood-drenched history but the multiple layers of denial that obscure every episode, Mr de Bellaigue, a former correspondent for this newspaper, conveys some important messages about the elusiveness of historical truth.

As he shows, in places where “the past is not even past”, the passage of time does not always make it easier to discern or speak the truth. It is difficult, though not impossible, to establish even the basic facts about the fate of the Armenians in this part of Anatolia; it is also hard to establish what horrors occurred during the Kurdish uprising which began in the 1990s and is still sputtering away.

So many of the people who might be able to offer enlightenment—be they local residents, or migrants to Istanbul or Germany—are consciously or unconsciously hiding truths: about themselves and their family histories, as well as more public events. For example, some Armenians who escaped in 1915 were re-socialised as Turks or Kurds, without entirely losing their genetic memory. This has odd effects on the way such people, and their descendants, think and talk; this book analyses those effects shrewdly but not unkindly.

Indeed, the best thing about the book is the intelligence with which the author deconstructs all the private and public myths that seem to be haunting his interlocutors, including the various servants of the Turkish state who take it upon themselves to set him straight about their country’s history.

Many of his official informants assume that a person of Anglo-Saxon appearance, speaking fluent Turkish, must belong to the long line of spies and troublemakers who have meddled in this part of the world on behalf of perfidious Albion. The reader is not invited to mock or despise these envoys of the state. On the contrary, the feeling is that for all the peculiar and indeed downright wrong things they believe, such people have their own particular integrity.

As an account of the way truth is constructed by communities and families living in a state of war and fear, “Rebel Land” ranks in sophistication with any primer of postmodern philosophy or social anthropology. It is also far more gripping, not least because it is told in the vulnerable but never self-indulgent voice of somebody who loves this part of Turkey, and has a soft spot for all the peoples who have lived, loved, died and killed there.




Keghart.com June 2009‏ - Dikran Abrahamian

Khamajignerou Opera-n‏

ARTICLE BY HRATCH INDJEYAN
AMMAN, JORDAN
ՅՕԴՈՒԱԾ ՀՐԱՉ ԻՆՃԷԵԱՆ-ԷՆ
ԱՄՄԱՆ, ՅՈՐԴԱՆԱՆ

Sardarapat-i Vogov Gotepndvats‏

ARTICLE BY DR. ARAMAIS MIRZAKHANIAN
STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN
ՅՕԴՈՒԱԾ ԴՈԿՏ. ԱՐԱՄԱՅԻՍ ՄԻՐԶԱԽԱՆԵԱՆ-ԷՆ
ՍԹՈՔՀՈԼՄ, ՇՈՒԷՏ


Yes-ue yev Voch-yes-ue Arvesdoum‏

ARTICLE BY DR. PROF. GEVORK KHERLOPIAN
CALIFORNIA, U. S. A.
ՅՕԴՈՒԱԾ ԴՈԿՏ. ՓՐՈՖ. ԳԷՈՐԳ ԽՐԼՈՊԵԱՆ-ԷՆ
ՔԱԼԻՖՈՐՆԻԱ, Մ. ՆԱՀԱՆԳՆԵՐ