Armenian Genocide News‏

FIRST MEMORIAL OF THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE TO BE BUILT IN ISRAEL
PanARMENIAN.Net
15.09.2009 23:44 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Union of Armenians of Israel "Ararat" has initiated
building of the first memorial of the Armenian Genocide in Petach
Tikva, Israel. As PanARMENIAN.Net reporter came to know from the
head of Union of Armenians of Israel Ashot Martirosyan, they already
have the agreement with municipality of the city. Ashot Martirosyan's
letter to all Armenians is presented below:

"Dear Compatriots.

The building of the memorial of the Armenian Genocide, dedicated to
the 95th anniversary of the Genocide, begins, on the initiative of
"Ararat", the Union of Armenians in Israel, and according to the
agreement with the Municipality of Petach Tikva. Numerous countries
have recognized the Armenian Genocide of 1915, memorials dedicated
to the victims of the Great Genocide soar in different corners of
the world, and building a memorial in the sacred country, in Israel,
is not only symbolic, but also one more step toward restoring the
historical justice.

For carrying out the sacred mission of creating a memorial, dedicated
to the victims of the Genocide in 1915, we expect your financial
assistance, we ask you all for moral and material support, through
which you will be recognized official patrons of the memorial and
will have your contribution in the sacred work of immortalizing the
memory of the victims of the Genocide. We are grateful for your help
and support."

ARMENIAN GENOCIDE MONUMENT IN MOSCOW
Information-Analytic Agency NEWS.am
Sept 11 2009
Armenia

10:37 / 09/11/2009A monument commemorating victims of Armenian Genocide
will be reared in Moscow, "Yerkramas" Armenian paper of Russia informs.

According to "Yerkramas", a September 10 plenary sitting of Moscow
Committee for Monument Protection was held in State Duma. The Committee
considered proposal of Union of Armenians of Russia (UAR) to set up
a sculptural complex in Moscow for victims of Armenian Genocide in
Ottoman Empire (1915). Armenian side will take over the financial
liabilities.

The monument might be erected in the area near New-Nakhichevan and
Russian Diocese Cathedral of the Armenian Apostolic Church (at the
crossing of Trifonov Street and Olympic Avenue).

THE ARMENIAN OPENING
Hurriyet Daily News
Sept 15 2009
Turkey

Obviously, there are objectionable and perhaps deplorable elements
in the Turkish-Armenian protocols but a careful reconsideration
might vividly demonstrate that they are products of a successful
and diligent diplomacy that caters to most of Turkey's outstanding
interests. Most important of all, though tacit, with these protocols
Armenia has delivered Ankara two crucial concessions.

What are they?

First of all Armenia has accepted for the first time ever the
creation of a history commission that might feature historians from
interested third parties in examining the genocide claims. That is,
without saying so the Serge Sarkisian administration of Armenian has
conceded from the "Genocide is a fact, there is no need to verify it
through scientific research or to discuss it" position. Secondly,
for the first time ever in the post-Soviet era, Armenia has agreed
to recognize the joint border with Turkey as was defined in the Kars
treaty, though there is no reference in the protocols to the Kars
treaty. Such recognition by Armenia is no less than declaring it has
no territorial claims from Turkey or it has turned a cold shoulder
to diaspora's land claims from Turkey.

Because of those concessions Sarkisian is now having a tough ride with
the Armenian opposition, while many Turkish diplomats who devoted a
life to battle Armenian claims against Turkey are expressing with
satisfaction appreciation for the Turkish "diplomatic victory" in
Armenia relations.

Yet, the opposition parties are fuming over the protocols and
delivering tough statements as if the ruling Justice and Development
Party, or AKP, government has betrayed Turkey's national interests.

All the issues on the table in Turkish-Armenian negotiations,
excluding one, are problems between the two countries. Recognition of
the Kars treaty or the joint border defined by that treaty and Armenia
declaring it has no territorial claims from Turkey, resolution of the
genocide claims through studies of a joint historical commission,
normalization of relations including establishment of diplomatic
relations and opening of the border gates are the most prominent
issues the Swiss-mediated silent diplomacy between Turkey and Armenia
has been aiming to achieve. Of these topics, only normalization of
relations and opening of the border gates heading was not a purely
bilateral subject as suspension of the plans to open a Turkish embassy
in Yerevan and closure of the border were decided by Ankara as a
reaction to the invasion and subsequent occupation of Nagorno-Karabakh,
a predominantly Armenian dominated enclave in Azerbaijan, and several
Azerbaijani-population regions around the mountainous enclave.

Indeed, without abandoning Azerbaijan and landing Turkish-Azerbaijani
relations in an unprecedented crisis and risking his own political
future very seriously no Turkish leader can open the border without a
resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh occupation or at least declaration
of a withdrawal timetable by Armenia. Can Armenia undertake such a
move now? What if, as was suggested earlier, Armenia withdraws from
Nagorno-Karabakh and the Azeri regions around and Russian peacekeepers
are deployed in the mountainous region? Even if with Azerbaijani
demands Turkish troops join Russians as peacekeepers in the disputed
territory, such a development might still be acceptable for Yerevan
as an "interim formula." After all, were not Russian military elements
together with Armenian troops in the occupation of the region?

Such a development may as well help Erdogan escape "treason"
accusation in the 2010 or 2011 early polls while convert him into a
"national hero" in Azerbaijan as he would have secured "liberation"
of occupied Azerbaijani land.

The outcome would serve to Turkish-Russian relations, as well as
the U.S. interests in this geography. Furthermore, such a resolution
would be a great contribution to Western energy security, and thus
would be applauded by the EU, too.

Can Armenia declare a withdrawal timetable? That might make Erdogan a
hero, otherwise, he will find himself in some very serious reputation
problems in domestic politics. Would he care? So far he proved that
he has no such worries.

TURKEY TO CHANGE ITS CURRENT POLICY ON ARMENIAN MONUMENTS?
PanARMENIAN.Net
15.09.2009 18:49 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The fact that Armenian monument on Turkish territory
no longer have stands bearing inscriptions on their Armenian origins
proves that they have been eliminated by Turkish nationalists,
Turkish historian, owner of Turkish Birzamanlar agency Osman Koker
told a PanARMENIAN.Net reporter. "Turkish nationalists are in this
way attempting to prove that those territories were never populated by
Armenians. That's their method of work," Turkish historian noted. Upon
entering Ani one can see no single inscription testifying to one-time
presence of Armenians, he added.

Nevertheless, Koker finds that country will soon change such policy
in relation to Armenians.

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GENOCIDE, INTERNATIONAL

LAW CONCLUDES IN BEIRUT

Hairenik website
September 9, 2009

BEIRUT-A two-day international conference on "The Armenian Genocide and
International Law," organized by Haigazian University and the Armenian
National Committee of the Middle East (ANC-ME), concluded on Sept. 4.

The conference drew in 13 experts in genocide and international law
from the U.S., Canada, Switzerland, Ireland, Armenia, Turkey, the
United Arab Emirates, Egypt, and Lebanon, who joined more than 80 local
political scientists, activists, sociologists, historians, religious
leaders, educators, international correspondents, journalists, and
students in addressing the consequences of the Armenian Genocide and
promoting a fair perspective through international law.

It covered such topics as genocide denial and recognition, Turkish
nationalism, and the politics of denial, as well as the economic
aspect of the genocide and the issue of lands and assets. Within the
framework of international law, the conference discussed the general
topic of genocide and crimes against humanity, retribution, and the
preservation of the Armenian cultural heritage.

More specifically, Dr. George Charaf (University of Lebanon) lectured
on the problem of minorities and majorities, discussing the case
of the Ottoman Empire. Dr. Ugur Ungor (University of Sheffield)
talked about demographic engineering in the Ottoman Empire and the
genocide. Dr. Mohammad Rifaat (University of Alexandria) discussed
the Armenian Question according to Arab sources. Dr. William Schabas
(National University of Ireland) discussed the problems and prospects
of the genocide and international law, 60 years after the International
Genocide Convention. Dr. Alfred De Zayas (Geneva School of Diplomacy
and International Relations) elaborated on the issues of justice
and international law regarding the genocide. Khatchig Mouradian
(Ph.D. student, Clark University) lectured on the Armenians, Raphael
Lemkin, and the UN Convention. Dr. Taner Akcam's paper, entitled
"Turkish Nationalism and the Armenian Genocide Issue in Turkey Today,"
was presented in absentia. Dr. Ragip Zarakolu (vice president, Human
Rights Association of Turkey) tackled the issue of genocide denial
and law in Turkey.

In the same context, Dr. Seyhan Bayraktar (University of Zurich)
covered the evolution of Armenian Genocide denial in the Turkish
press. Bilgin Ayata (PhD. Candidate, John Hopkins University) discussed
Kurdish-Armenian relations and the Armenian Genocide. Dr. Roger
Smith (professor emeritus of government, College of William
and Mary) lectured on professional ethics and the denial of the
Armenian Genocide. Dr. Henry Theriault (Worcester State College)
discussed restorative justice and alleviating the consequences of
genocide. And finally, Dr. Richard Hovannisian (UCLA) covered the
issue of universalizing the legacy of the Armenian Genocide.

The sessions were moderated by Dr. Arda Ekmekji, Dr. Naila Kaidbey,
Giro Manoyan, Dr. Rania Masri, Dr. Joseph Bayeh, Dr. Ohannes Geukjian,
Antranig Dakessian, and Dr. Haig Demoyan. Conference organizers have
announced that the presentations will be published in a volume.

Rev. Dr. Paul Haidostian, the president of Haigazian University, said
that such conferences keep the genocide issue alive and add to the
increasingly growing international momentum toward recognition. "The
topic of genocide, and this conference in particular, will hopefully
open the door to further academic studies and research, activating
deeper study in the economic, social, and legal aspects of inter-state
relations," he said.

"The Armenian Genocide is not simply an Armenian problem but
essentially an international burden," he added. "The victim carries
a strong sense of ownership of pain, but human civilization cannot
be considered as highly developed if it does not embrace a sense of
advocacy for the victimized."

Haidostian spoke about four key points. First, "that injustices
of any nation against any other nation are part of the same human
manifestation of evil that require joint and effective global
action." Second, "that this international conference convenes in a
country, Lebanon, which continues to be a unique land of dialogue and
culture despite the ever-present seeds of misunderstanding." Third,
giving the example of Haigazian University, and more specifically
the name of Armenag Haigazian, a victim of the genocide, Haidostian
emphasized that "our calling has been and continues to be standing
up for new life not only for Armenians but especially for our Arab
brothers and sisters, and really, all people of the world." Finally,
Haidostian explained that given the fact that the conference was being
held at a university no academic community can be value-neutral. "A
university may be a neutral medium of dialogue, but it is essentially
a forum of passion for deeper knowledge, responsibility, and
enlightenment."

In her message, Vera Yacoubian, the executive director of the ANC-ME,
spoke about the efforts of the ANC in highlighting the Armenian
community's role throughout the Middle East, its coexistence with
surrounding Arab and Islamic communities, and its efforts in addressing
the Armenian Cause.

Yacoubian expressed hope that the conference would provide a
significant breakthrough in analyzing the Armenian Genocide, as it
brought together a large group of specialists in the arena of genocide
and international law.

Regarding Turkish-Armenian relations, Yacoubian noted, "We cannot
ignore or disregard recent developments and address these pending
issues without resolving past history between the two nations. Indeed,
Turkish-Armenian relations carry the heavy burden of the Armenian
Genocide and there is high level of doubt and mistrust regarding
Turkish intentions."

Yacoubian concluded by questioning Turkey's responsibility towards
acknowledging the Armenian Genocide and the future of the Armenian
Cause.

Marios Garoyan, the president of the House of Representatives of
Cyprus, gave the inaugural speech at the conference on Sept. 2. His
presence as the guest speaker, he said, was driven by his country's
"commitment to international law, peace, security, and stability,
but also the determination to continue to condemn, on every possible
occasion, any infringement of international law by acts of genocide."

"On the one hand, governments and parliaments should act together
and closely cooperate in terms of assessing the progress made with
regard to the implementation of the United Nations Convention on
the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide and identify
measures to be taken at all levels," he said. "On the other hand, it
is the states that must cooperate for the prevention and punishment
of those responsible for the crime of genocide."

Garoyian questioned Turkey's role as mediator, peacemaker, and
peacekeeper in the wider Middle East, while Turkey continues to deny
the truth of the crimes perpetrated by its Ottoman predecessors.

He noted that Cyprus has always stood by the Armenian people in their
struggle for the recognition of the Armenian Genocide. In 1975, the
Cyprus House of Representatives was one of the first parliaments in
the world to adopt a resolution calling the atrocities inflicted upon
the Armenians "genocide." Garoyian added that Cyprus and its people
have many more reasons to understand the injustice of the genocide
due to "the implementation of Turkey's policy of ethnic cleansing
against Cyprus' population during the 1974 invasion and the continuing
occupation of 37 percent of Cyprus' territory."

Among the capacity audience were Minister Alain Tabourian, representing
the Lebanese president, Michel Suleiman; parliament member Hagop
Pakradouni, representing the parliament speaker, Nabih Berry;
Minister Jean Oghasabian, representing the president of the Council
of Ministers, Fouad Sanioura; parliament member Sebouh Kalpakian,
representing the appointed president of the Council of Ministers,
Saad Rafic Hariri; parliament member Shant Chinchinian; ambassadors
of the United Kingdom, Cyprus, Uruguay, and the Czech Republic; the
president of the Union of Armenian Evangelical Churches in the Near
East, Rev. Megrdich Karagozian; the Prelate of the Armenian Apostolic
Church of Lebanon, Bishop Kegham Khatcherian; the president of the
Armenian Protestant community in Syria, Rev. Haroutune Selimian;
representatives of embassies, Armenian and Lebanese political parties,
and cultural associations; former members of parliament; ministers;
religious leaders; and guests of the conference.

The inaugural session of the conference took place at the hall of the
First Armenian Evangelical Church of Beirut. Public lectures by some
of the participants of the conference took place during the first
week of September.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~