Thursday, 24 January 2008

Passage for Armenian Genocide Resolution‏

WASHINGTON, DC – Presidential candidate Barack Obama shared with the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA) a strongly worded statement today calling for Congressional passage of the Armenian Genocide Resolution (H.Res.106 & S.Res.106), and pledging that, as president, he will

recognize the Armenian Genocide.

In his statement, the Presidential hopeful reaffirmed his support for a strong “U.S.-Armenian relationship that advances our common security and strengthens Armenian democracy.” He also pledged to “promote Armenian security by seeking an end to the Turkish and Azerbaijani blockades, and by working for a lasting and durable settlement of the Nagorno Karabagh conflict that is agreeable to all parties, and based upon America’s founding commitment to the principles of democracy and self determination.”

“Armenian American voters welcome Senator Obama’s powerful call for real change in how our government addresses the core moral and foreign policy issues that hold such great meaning for our community,” said ANCA Executive Director Aram Hamparian. “After decades of White House complicity in Turkey’s efforts to block American recognition of the Armenian Genocide, most recently in the form of President Bush’s personal efforts this past October to delay the Armenian Genocide Resolution, the time has clearly come for a President who will personally lead – not obstruct – the commemoration of this crime against all humanity.”

As a Senator, Barack Obama has spoken in support of U.S. affirmation of the Armenian Genocide and cosigned a letter urging President Bush to properly recognize the Armenian Genocide. He has forcefully called for the adoption of the Armenian Genocide Resolution, but has yet to formally cosponsor this legislation. While visiting Azerbaijan in August 2005, Senator Obama was asked by reporters why he cosigned the letter to President Bush. Obama defended his decision by stating the genocide was a historical fact. The Illinois Senator publicly criticized the firing of former U.S. Ambassador to Armenia John Evans, who was dismissed for speaking truthfully about the Armenian Genocide.

In recent weeks, the ANCA has invited each of the candidates to share their views on Armenian Americans issues, and to comment on both the growing relationship between the U.S. and Armenian governments and the enduring bonds between the American and Armenian peoples. Questionnaires sent to the candidates have invited them to respond to a set of 19 questions, including those addressing: affirmation of the Armenian Genocide, U.S.-Armenia economic, political, and military relations, self-determination for Nagorno Karabagh, the Turkish and Azerbaijani blockades, and the genocide in Darfur.

Armenian Americans, in key primary states and throughout the country, represent a motivated and highly networked constituency of more than one and a half million citizens. The ANCA mobilizes Armenian American voters through a network of over 50 chapters and a diverse array of affiliates, civic advocates, and supporters nationwide. ANCA mailings reach over a quarter of a million homes, and, through the internet, updates and action alerts reach well over 100,000 households. The ANCA website, which features election coverage from an Armenian American point of view, attracts over 100,000 unique visits a month. The ANCA also has broad reach to Armenian American voters via a sophisticated media operation of newspapers, regional cable shows, satellite TV, blogs, and internet news sites.

Press release



Armenia Solidarity


Nor Serount Cultural Association


Armenian Genocide Trust


Seyfo Centre




Hrant Dink Commemmoration in London




London (Saturday 19.01.2008) - A diverse crowd comprising of Armenians, Kurds, Turks and intellectuals of other nationalities marked the first anniversary of the death of Hrant Dink at the Monument to the Innocents in front of Westminster Abbey, London on Saturday.


Prayers were said by Canon Segovsky of Westminster Abbey. The author Nouritza Matossian, a friend of Hrant paid her own personal tribute. The author Des Fernandes spoke about Hrant's clear position on the Genocide.


Kasim Agpak said that Hrant's death was "the outcome of a long planned implementation of constitutional racism and anti-democratic articles and attitudes"


Messages of support were read from the singer Diamanda Galas, Swedish MP Esabelle Reshdouni, Gurgin Bakircioglu (Vice Chair of The Kurdish Student and Academic Association of Sweden and editor of Beyan.net). A portion of Hrant's work was read by Nouritza Matossian. Professor Khatchatur Pilikian, as his tribute, sang "God the Free (song of freedom)" by Mikael Nalbandian and two white doves of peace were released by Khatchig Vartanian, Editor of the UK Armenian magazine, "Voice of Nor Serount".


The numerous Kurds, Armenians and Turks present agreed to enter in dialogue and consecrate their lives to study and learn fro Hrant's many articles.

Saturday, 12 January 2008

301 REFORM? FORGET IT!
Yusuf Kanli
Turkish Daily News, Turkey
Jan 9 2008

If the government hopes to leave behind its 301-related headaches
with some cosmetic changes to the law, what it has offered so far
won't help at all

Under pressure from the European Union as well as from Turkish
intellectuals, but unwilling to take any meaningful steps in
fear of a possible nationalistic backlash, the ruling Justice and
Development Party (AKP) has devised some cosmetic changes to the
Penal Code's contentious Article 301 that regulates penalties for
"abasing Turkishness."

Thus, the cunning AKP thinks that with the amendment - expected to be
proposed to Parliament this week - it will be able to tell Europe and
Turkish intellectuals "Look, we have abided by our word and amended
Article 301 as we promised" on the one hand, while at the same time
turning to conservative circles in society to say "Look, we have
defied all pressure and kept 'abasing Turkishness' as a serious crime,
punishable with permission of the Justice Minister... We did not bow
to pressure!"

Let's put it right straight away! As it stands within the current AKP
proposal for its amendment, the contentious Article 301 will remain
as a chain on free thought... What's proposed is not reform.

What we are seeing is deception in action!

Proposed changes

According to what has been leaked to the media so far, the changes the
AKP is proposing to make in the text and preamble of the contentious
article are:

1. Rather than the current description of Turkishness which includes
not only the Turkish state, its institutions, Turks living in the
country but also persons living anywhere else on the globe but who have
"ethnic ties" with Turkey, the draft preamble states that the "Turkish
nation means the entirety of Turks living on the same homeland." So,
under the new description of the "nation" if Iraqi Turks, Azeris,
Turkmens, other central Asian Turkic peoples, Turks in northern
Cyprus and Turkish minorities across the Balkan states are no longer
considered part of the Turkish nation and if their Turkishness is
abased, people engaging in such "acts" will no longer face court
charges under the new 301. What a big achievement!

2. In the draft the ambiguous "abasement of Turkishness" terminology
remains, but "abasement of Turkishness" can be considered a crime
if there is "intense intent" to abase Turkishness. Who will decide
whether there was "intense intent" and under what scale of measurement?

3. Contrary to the current practice that empowers prosecutors to open
cases against individuals on the grounds of violating Article 301 with
their statements or attitudes, with the proposed amendments enacted,
the opening of such cases will require the written permission of the
Justice Minister. But was that not the practice until the new Penal
Code entered into force a few years ago? If so, is this progress,
or a step backward? Furthermore, would not such a practice mean
interference of politics in the judiciary?

4. Rather than the present, rather obscure terminology, "abasing
Turkishness", the draft introduces the term "abasing the Turkish
nation" instead. And instead of "Republic" it qualifies it as the
"Turkish republic." It's like in the saying, "What's the difference
in saying 'Ali Veli' or 'Veli Ali'?"

5. Under Article 301, rather than the current maximum three years
behind bars, a person can be sentenced to a maximum two years. Also,
a one-third increase in the penalty if the "crime" is committed abroad
will be scrapped.

Is it so difficult?

Of course we would prefer to see this contentious article erased from
the Penal Code all together and we have no such obsessive crime in this
country, but at least, is it really so difficult to erase the ambiguous
"abasement" word from the entire article and replace it with the word
"insult" which I believe has a much clearer meaning?

The AKP has waited almost a year after the Jan. 19, 2006 murder
of our colleague Hrant Dink who was made a target because of that
contentious article and is now trying to legislate an amendment by the
date of first anniversary of his killing in front of his bi-lingual
Turkish-Armenian weekly, AGOS. When Dink was murdered, the AKP leaders
had been telling the Turkish media and Europeans for some time that
amending 301 was high on their agenda. Hrant was killed and scores of
other Turkish intellectuals were harassed and made targets under that
Penal Code clause reflecting a rather primitive understanding. And,
the AKP is proposing a cosmetic change...

They had better not do it... What the AKP is proposing as "reform"
in that contentious article is not reform at all, but an attempt
to deceive.

DEVLET BAHCELI: MHP NOT INTERESTED IN ANY PROPOSAL ON ARTICLE 301
Today's Zaman, Turkey
Jan 9 2008


The Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) has refused to support a
government attempt to amend controversial Article 301 of the Turkish
Penal Code (TCK), which the government says restricts freedom of
expression.

MHP Chairman Devlet Bahceli said, "It should be noted that the MHP
strongly opposes any amendments to Article 301 of the TCK; it will
not be interested in any proposal on this matter." The MHP leader
further stressed that the party is determined to fight against those
uneasy with the article's current content.

The MHP leader began his speech, addressing his group in Parliament,
by condemning the recent bombing in Diyarbakýr and then said, "For us,
seeking an amendment of this article means rewarding the circles that
seek an opportunity to defame Turkey's honorable history, denigrate the
Turkish nation and insult the national and spiritual values of Turkey."

Asserting that the administration had facilitated the job of the
separatists for the sake of membership in the EU, the MHP leader
underlined that leniency in Article 301 would lead to insults of
Turkishness and national symbols such as the flag.

Bahceli further said, "The similarity between those who seek to accuse
Turkish nationalists and the circles who work hard for the recognition
of the so-called Armenian genocide should be carefully considered."

He also asserted that the MHP had forced the government to launch
cross-border operations. Claiming that the MHP's determination and
attempts encouraged the administration to take action against the PKK,
Bahceli said: "You should recall that the current administration has
held power for the last five years. The main opposition has been
all the same in this period. Terror has been escalated by certain
circles. ... The actors in the past were all the same. What changed is
that the MHP has won 70 seats in Parliament. This change has pushed
Turkey and global actors into dealing with the Kurdistan Workers'
Party [PKK]."

REMINDER OF A COMMEMORATIVE EVENT TO BE OBSERVED ALL OVER THE WORLD

FOLLOWED BY ARTICLES DEMONSTRATING THAT TURKEY HAS YET TO LEARN

THE LESSONS FROM HIS MURDER

Armenia Solidarity

Nor Serount

Armenian Genocide Trust

Seyfo Centre

Wreath-laying in Memory of Hrant Dink

You are invited to this event on the first anniversary of Hrant Dink's assasination

Saturday,19th January at 1.00 pm

at the Monument to the Innocents

outside Westminster Abbey, London

1 Prayers from the Canon of Westminster Abbey

2 Short speeches from personal Armenian &non-Armenian friends.

3 Reading of portion of Hrant's work

4 Release of dove in memory of Hrant


Friday, 11 January 2008

2007’s Top 10 Influential Comments or Events in the Armenian World

By APPO JABARIAN
Executive Publisher/Managing Editor
USA ARMENIAN LIFE Magazine
The year 2007 will go down in the Armenian history annals as a ground-breaking year. In many ways, the year brought an impressive number of victories for the Armenians. How can one talk of 2007 and not mention the valiant individuals who significantly impacted our collective life, in the service of Justice and Humanity?

Can one overlook the hold placed by Sen. Menedez on Amb. Dick Hoagland’s nomination as U.S. Amb. to Armenia? Can you overlook the strong ties that some of our leaders have with world leaders? How can one undervalue the famous presidential letter by French Pres. Nicholas Sarkozy to His Holiness Aram I, the Catholicos of The Great House of Cilicia? Our readers vividly remember the reaffirmation of France’s commitment to Truth and Justice for the Armenian people. Sarkozy blatantly criticized Turkey
for its obstinate denial of the Armenian Genocide and urged it to recognize the Turkish state-sponsored calamity that befell the Armenians.
Another '07 unforgettable event: The "Knock At The Door," the book on an intimate mother-daughter Armenian Genocide-related story earned international acclaim. Its well-known Armenian-American author Margaret Ahnert Ajemian became a target for denialist Turkish violence in New York City in 2007. Contrary to her parents' generation saying "mortseer" ("forget"), Ahnert urges "heesh'eh" ("remember!").

Besides being impressive, the list of influential comments and events that came to life in 2007 in the pages of this weekly, is also encouragingly long. However, because of space and time limitations, this writer had to narrow down to a compressed list of ten. May be in the future, a fellow media worker can expand on this idea and present a comprehensive list. For now here’s the short list of the top comments and/or events in chronological order:
#1. Ahmet Ertegun Knew What’s Good for Turkey: Genocide Recognition

Ahmet Ertegun passed away on
December 14, 2006. On Jan. 5, 2007, Harut Sassounian, the Publisher of The California Courier, wrote: “Ahmet Ertegun was a music magnate who launched the careers of many great singers and groups, such as Ray Charles, Led Zeppelin and the Rolling Stones. … He surprised me by saying that he could not understand why Turkish officials denied the Armenian Genocide - a fact known to the entire world. He made it clear that he was not acknowledging the Genocide in order to appease the Armenians. He believed that it was, first of all, in Turkey’s interest to acknowledge the Genocide, because doing so would help Ankara’s application for membership in the European Union and get rid of the stigma that had haunted his native land for so many years. Ertegun said he had read about the Armenian Genocide in many Western books, but had not seen a single reputable book that denied its occurrence. He referred to Turkish officials who denied the Genocide as being ‘Turk ghafali,’ implying that they had a stubborn Turkish mentality.”
#2. TIME EUROPE: Truth Prevails over Millions Spent By Turks to Lie about the Genocide

On
Feb 9, 2007, Sassounian wrote: “It took a little more than a year and a half, but it was well worth the wait. After lengthy, sometimes complex, but mostly amicable discussions, the European edition of TIME magazine, in its Feb. 12, 2007 issue, published a full-page text on the Armenian Genocide and distributed a complimentary DVD, in English and French, which contains a compelling 52-minute documentary on the Armenian Genocide by French director Laurence Jourdan. The DVD also includes a 46-minute interview with Dr. Yves Ternon, a leading expert on the Armenian Genocide. This issue of the magazine, which has been on newsstands since Feb. 2 in 67 countries throughout Europe, parts of Africa, Asia and the Middle East, was sold out within the first 48 hours of its availability. When scores of TIME subscribers, the Switzerland-Armenia Association (SAA) and this columnist complained to TIME executives, Managing Editor James Kelly in a letter to SAA dated Sept. 2, 2005, apologized for having disseminated the Turkish DVD which he said ‘was not adequately reviewed by anyone at TIME.” Furthermore, he acknowledged that the Turkish DVD did not “meet TIME’s standards for fairness and accuracy.’”

#3. Convicted Turkish Denialist Becomes Unwitting Publicist for Genocide

On
March 16, 2007, Sassounian wrote: “ The Switzerland-Armenia Association (SAA) and its co-president, Sarkis Shahinian should be commended for initiating the court proceeding against Perincek and sparing no effort in attaining this successful outcome. Given the special role of the SAA in this case, the Judge ordered Perincek to pay to the Swiss Armenian organization an additional $9,000 for legal expenses and ‘moral compensation.’ Clearly, this court case is bound to have far-reaching consequences for the Armenian Cause. For years, Turkish denialists gleefully noted that the Armenian Genocide could not be qualified as such, since there were no court verdicts to that effect. Furthermore, this verdict transcended the conviction of Perincek as a lone Turkish individual. … Despite his limited income, Perincek somehow had managed to charter a large airliner to transport his supporters from Turkey to Switzerland. Since it was obvious that the Turkish authorities were backing Perincek in a variety of ways, his conviction was a major setback for the Turkish state as well. In a written statement, the Turkish Foreign Ministry declared: “The court case was inappropriate, groundless and controversial in every sense.”

#4. A NEW BOOK: “British Reports on Ethnic Cleansing in
Anatolia, 1919-1922: The Armenian-Greek Section”

When in May, 2007, world-famous attorney Vartkes Yeghiayan presented this book, USA Armenian Life reported: “British Reports on Ethnic Cleansing in Anatolia, 1919-1922: Minutes of the Armenian Greek Section, forms a continuum with the “Blue Book” by Viscount Bryce that chronicled the massacres and ethnic cleansing of Armenians in 1915. When it became clear to the British that they couldn’t neutralize Ataturk, they shut down the A.G.S., abandoned
Constantinople, abandoned the Armenians and Greeks still stuck under the yoke of triumphant Turks, declared victory, and returned to England - after having secured rights to Mosul oil. Soon after, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk became the President of the Republic and ever since, successive Turkish governments have denied that, their “War of Independence” was nothing else but the ethnic cleansing of Greeks and Armenians from their millennia-old natural habitats. This important book sets the record straight.”

#5.
TURKEY: Who wants to invest in a country with this type of history and philosophy!

On
May 18, 2007, Michael Williams from Colton, California, a reader of USA Armenian Life, wrote in his letter to Boycott Turkey Committee of America: “The Turkish media claims that their government is secular and that the army would overthrow any Islamic-based government. I have watched a few travel programs where Turkey is highlighted as a peaceful and safe place to travel again emphasizing the secular nature of the government and the fact that they want to and will some day join the European Union. This is not consistent with the facts. It was reported that the Interior Minister of Turkey was smirking as he spoke of the murder of the three missionaries. I agree with your boycott of Turkey. I checked my investments and found that two of my mutual funds owned Turkish companies. I wrote the mutual fund companies and told them, I did not want to invest in any fund that owned Turkish companies. The funds were sold. Who wants to invest in a country with this type of history and philosophy! I will be carefully reviewing my spending and investing to make sure that I am not supporting a country that denies the Armenian Genocide and continues to take lightly the murder of other Christians today.”
#6. Rev. Krikor Aghabaloglu of Istanbul: How free are we?

During the week end of May 17-21, the courageous "Baadvelee" (Reverend) Krikor Aghabaloglu, the pastor of the
Beyoglu Pasha Armenian Evangelical Church in Istanbul, visited the Armenian American community in San Francisco. Rev. Aghabaloglu was invited by Rev. Nerses Balabanian, the pastor of the Calvary Armenian Congregational Church of San Francisco.

Rev. Aghabaloglu delivered enlightening and insightful remarks during the Saturday evening banquet. The banquet took place on May 19, at the jam-packed hall of the church. His speech was interrupted by thunderous applause and at times with standing ovations. Rev. Aghabaloglu gave an interview to USA Armenian Life Magazine on Sunday just before his departure to
New Jersey. He told this writer: “Official people do not like the Armenians, because the following lies in their hearts: ‘Why have the Armenian people throughout one thousand years … not become Muslim and were not Turkified?’ ... Now the Turkish people in Europe are erecting mosques. Is it not true? Europe is Christian. She says: "You're Muslim. Come and open your mosque. Open your school and at the same time, during your holidays, take your Turkish flag and walk in the streets. Can’t they do it? They can! Don't they?

“For once, can you, as Armenian in
Turkey take one Armenian flag and observe a holiday? Can you do it? What kind of freedom is that? How free are we? Can you teach your own children in the Armenian school the Armenian history? ... I do not want the Armenian people to get lost in Europe. I do not want them to go into oblivion. They should flourish even more. They should be awakened even more.”
#7. L.A. Times Managing Editor Resigns After Killing Article on Armenian Genocide

On
July 6, 2007 Sassounian wrote: “Douglas Frantz, Managing Editor of the Los Angeles Times, resigned last week following his controversial decision in April to block the publication of a major article on the Armenian Genocide, written by reporter Mark Arax. In a press release, the ANCA characterized Frantz’s resignation as ‘an appropriate answer to his unprofessional behavior and anti-Armenian posture in the newsroom. The Los Angeles Times is a fine newspaper and deserves better than to have a genocide denier as a member of its senior staff. The fact that Frantz is returning to Istanbul tells the full story of where he stands.’ … Armenians will now have to monitor Frantz’s reportage from Istanbul in the Wall Street Journal. The Armenian community’s concern is justified in view of the fact that for many years the Wall Street Journal has been more pro-Turkish than even the Turkish Daily News! …During the past two months, Frantz’s unwarranted actions created considerable tension between the Los Angeles Times and over half million Armenian American residents of Southern California. With his departure, the Armenian community can now look forward to the renewal of the constructive relationship that had developed in recent months with Publisher Hiller and other senior executives of one of America’s most prominent newspapers.”

#8. How would NPFH and the ADL react if Armenian organizations blocked acknowledgement of the Holocaust?”

On
Friday, July 6, 2007, The Watertown TAB published a far-reaching letter by David Boyajian, one of USA Armenian Life’s contributing writers. Boyajian very eloquently and effectively exposed the most recent anti-Armenian development at the Jewish "Anti-Defamation League.” Boyajian wrote: “’No Place for Hate’ (NPFH) programs, such as Watertown’s, are tarnished by the fact that the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) has authored and sponsored them. The ADL, you see, has made the Holocaust and its denial key pieces of NPFH while at the same time hypocritically working with Turkey to oppose recognition of the Armenian genocide of 1915-23. This has been known for years. One underlying reason is the Israeli-Turkish alliance. Opposing affirmation of the Armenian genocide is an affront to all fair-minded people. How would NPFH and the ADL react if Armenian organizations blocked acknowledgement of the Holocaust?”

Boyajian concluded: “I say these things with deep sorrow. After all, many distinguished Jewish individuals and organizations, such as the Jewish War Veterans of the
USA, support Armenian genocide recognition. But the ADL’s dishonest policies toward Christian Armenians and their genocide violate NPFH’s own principles. NPFH is, therefore, ethically obligated to sever its ties to the ADL.”
#9. Aznavour: The Patriarch of French Songs

The much anticipated concert day for thousands of Aznavour fans in
Paris finally arrived on October 19, 2007. This writer attended the concert. The ever youthful Aznavour at 83 years of age, widely known as "The Patriarch of French Songs," just before the start of his much anticipated performance that night, quipped that the document for his funeral arrangement, prepared by the funeral company, will end up being drowned in dust, because the Patriarch of French songs has no intention to depart anytime soon. And one can tell, from his resilient tenacity, that this legendary artist means business!

#10. Turkish Law Prof. Lucidly Recognizes The Fairness Of The Armenian Demand For Justice
On Dec. 7, 2007, Sassounian wrote: “The Armenian Cause is not about genocide recognition, but the pursuit of justice which entails that the Armenian victims receive reparations. Remembering the Genocide is also about keeping the hopes and dreams alive for succeeding generations of Armenians - that some day, they will regain their historic lands.”

In response to Sassounian's article, Prof. Ugurhan Berkok asked the following interesting question to the Michigan University-based 'armworkshop' members: "Beyond the politics, ethics and morals, I have some legal questions on this RRR discussion. Forget about R1 [Recognition] for a moment and concentrate on law. Can't victims' descendants file claims under current Turkish laws? After all, deportation is acknowledged by the
Republic of Turkey. Now assume R1. No political (legally non-binding) statements to the effect of 'no claims will be made' are credible because R1 will legally enable victims' descendants to make claims. Thus Sassounian's opinion is in fact reality, whether the intention is there or not because no organization can coerce individual descendants to sign legally-binding 'no-claim' promises. Thus the three R's are not legally splittable. Am I not right?"

Apparently, the Turkish law Prof. Berkok has lucidly come to realize the essence of the fairness of the Armenian demand for Justice.

OLLI REHN: ARTICLE 301 POISONING TURKEY'S RELATIONS WITH ARMENIA

OLLI REHN: ARTICLE 301 POISONING TURKEY'S RELATIONS WITH ARMENIA
PanARMENIAN.Net
25.12.2007 18:07 GMT+04:00


/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Turkey is preparing to amend a controversial law on
freedom of speech that has been criticized repeatedly by the European
Union and could slow EU accession talks with Brussels.

The Justice Ministry will hand the draft amendment to article 301 of
the Penal Code, which makes it an offence to "insult Turkishness",
to the cabinet within 15 days, Justice Minister Mehmet Ali Sahin told
reporters on Tuesday.

It was not clear when the cabinet would approve the amendment.

The European Commission's annual progress report on Turkey, published
in November, called on Ankara to make "significant further efforts"
on freedom of expression and religion, and noted that more people
had been prosecuted under article 301 last year than in 2005.

Enlargement Commissioner Olli Rehn has recommended that the EU not
extend accession talks to the key areas of justice and human rights
until the article is changed.

EU officials said the law was poisoning Turkey's relations with
Armenia.


Ankara began EU accession negotiations in 2005 but the EU suspended
talks last December on eight of the 35 chapters or policy areas into
which EU law is divided after Ankara refused to open its ports and
airports to traffic from Cyprus, Reuters reports.

Friday, 4 January 2008

INTERNATIONAL MEDIATORS ATTACH NEW ELEMENTS TO PROPOSALS ON ARMENIAN-AZERBAIJANI CONFLICT SETTLEMENT: US DIPLOMAT: ARTICLE 301 POISONING TURKEY'S

2007-12-25 14:12:00

ArmInfo. The international mediators attached new elements to the last proposals on Nagorno-Karabakh conflict settlement, which were presented to Azerbaijan and Armenia in Madrid. The details of the elements are not made publicly available due to the confidentiality of the talks. "
There are several new elements to this proposal, although I would rather not comment on the specifics until the presidents have had the opportunity to thoroughly study the principles and discuss their views with us," said the US Co-chair of the OSCE Minsk Group, Matthew Bryza, in his online interview with Trend on 24 December.

The written proposals which are comprised of ten principles were presented to the conflicting sides by the OSCE Co-chairs late November in Madrid.

Presenting the proposals to the Foreign Ministers of Azerbaijan and Armenia, the mediators stated that they presented the proposals in a written form for prompt adoption due to the danger that after the possible replacement of the powers in both countries as a result of the presidential elections, the new heads may deny the agreement reached by the sides. The principles of the settlement are not made publicly available due to the confidentiality of the talks.

According to Bryza, the mediators have not yet heard the formal responses of Presidents of Azerbaijan, Ilham Aliyev and Armenia, Robert Kocharyan, to the proposed Basic Principles for the Settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict. "
We consider it a positive development that the two sides are seriously studying the document and have both indicated an oral "gentlemen's agreement" is possible before the Armenian elections in February. We will discuss our proposal with the presidents in detail when we travel to the region in mid-January,"
Bryza said.

"Once an agreement is reached, we are assuming the sides will disclose the specifics of the Basic Principles to the public. However, until we have reached an agreement, we would rather not to comment on these specific elements," he said.

"The Co-Chairs firmly believe the current set of ideas on the table provides the only logical and practicable way to advance towards a peaceful settlement of the conflict, and we hope the two presidents will come to this conclusion as well," the US diplomat said.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~