Showing posts with label 4th September 2009. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 4th September 2009. Show all posts

Friday, 4 September 2009

Armenia: Turkey Protocols - UK press reports‏

Football diplomacy
Sep 3rd 2009 | ANKARA
From The Economist print edition


It may take a long time to restore relations between two old enemies


AFTER decades of fierce animosity, are Turkey and Armenia getting closer to peace? This week the two countries announced plans for six weeks of “internal political consultations” before establishing diplomatic ties and reopening their border. Coming after several months of Swiss mediation and arm-twisting by America, the declaration makes reconciliation between Turkey and Armenia a real prospect—but not a foregone conclusion.

Hopes of a new friendship blossomed in September 2008 when Turkey’s president, Abdullah Gul, became the first modern Turkish leader to visit Armenia, for a football World Cup qualifier (which Armenia lost). A full deal seemed imminent in April when the two countries initialled a preliminary agreement, including a plan to reopen the border. This was sealed by the Turks in 1993 in solidarity with their Azeri cousins during Azerbaijan’s short, sharp war with Armenia over Nagorno-Karabakh, a mainly Armenian enclave of Azerbaijan (which Armenia won).

Turkey had earlier insisted that it would not reopen the border until Armenia and Azerbaijan had made peace. But in April it seemed to change tack. The main reason was to stop America’s Congress adopting a resolution to label the mass slaughter of the Ottoman Armenians in 1915 as genocide. It worked: Barack Obama did not use the term in his annual April 24th statement on the anniversary of the killings.

Yet days later the Turkish prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, reverted to previous policy by insisting that peace with Armenia would come only if the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict was solved. The switch back reflected nationalist reaction at home as well as Azerbaijan’s threat to turn towards Russia. Armenia’s president, Serzh Sargsyan, retaliated by saying he would not attend a return football match in Turkey on October 14th unless the border was on the verge of being reopened.

This week’s announcement is calculated to ensure that Mr Sargsyan comes to the match, maintaining the façade of reconciliation. By careful coincidence the time for internal political consultations ends just before the match. Links of various sorts between the two countries are growing fast and Armenian tourists have been flocking to the Turkish coast. Yet hostility to a deal from opposition parties in both countries is strong.

Armenia’s hardline nationalists are furious that the government has agreed both to the present border and to a joint historical commission that might yet call the genocide into doubt. They also accuse Mr Sargsyan of selling out Karabakh. Even if the April 22nd deal is accepted, another hurdle has been raised: both countries’ parliaments must agree. To stifle domestic anger (and perhaps embarrass the Turks) Armenia also chose to publish the full text of the agreements in April. They do not mention Nagorno-Karabakh.

Turkey’s response has been contradictory. Its foreign minister, Ahmet Davutoglu, insists that he hopes that the border will be reopened by the end of the year. But he also says that peace with Armenia is sustainable only if it makes peace with Azerbaijan. Long-running talks between Armenia and Azerbaijan seem to be going nowhere. Mr Davutoglu’s most accurate assertion may be that Turkey and Armenia are at the start of a “long process.” How long is anybody’s guess.

The Times
September 2, 2009
Bronwen Maddox, Chief Foreign Commentator
Turkey and Armenia sidestep 94-year-old massacre for tentative peace

It's taken only 94 years to make peace. It might have taken much longer.
The talks between Turkey and Armenia about whether they can manage something
like normal relations are probably more symbol than substance. But they
represent a gesture that might easily not have been made, particularly by
Turkey. They are an unexpected step towards calm from the tense borderlands
between Europe and Central Asia.

They will have an effect in the US, too, where the clash between Armenia and
Turkey has played to a nationwide, passionate audience, from Congress to the
singer Cher (who is Armenian). In Europe it might seem like a far-off
dispute; in the US it is intimate, eating up congressional debates and
national airtime.

Even in the European Union it will have an impact greater than this week's
tentative moves suggest. It will ease Turkey's relations with the EU after
several years of friction.

Yet the steps, so far, are small. On Monday the two said that they would
sign a pact within weeks to talk about resuming ties, although that hurdle
would need approval by both parliaments. If they get that far, it would end
nearly a century of animosity that stems from the killing of as many as 1.5
million Armenians under the Ottoman Empire in 1915, during the First World
War. Armenia calls it genocide and wants an admission and an apology. Turkey
maintains that many were killed on each side. There have not been diplomatic
ties, other than when Armenia was part of the Soviet Union. The border was
closed during the 1988-94 conflict over the Azerbaijani region of
Nagorno-Karabakh.

Now the border might open, possibly by the new year, officials on each side
suggest, although the greater impetus for a deal clearly comes from Armenia.
It is landlocked, and has an urgent need for trade. As its President, Serzh
Sargsyan, said yesterday: `Armenia initiated the possibility of normalising
relations' - adding, grandly but justifiably, that he had done so `with
dignity as it is appropriate to the civilised world of the 21st century'.

The agreement, brokered by Swiss officials and taking shape since April,
baldly leaves aside history, genocide or the frozen Nagorno-Karabakh dispute
(although Turkey insists progress on this front needs to happen in
parallel). This is what you might call constructive evasion. We should hope
that they manage at least to open the border. Allowing everyday contact
would be an antidote to the understandable difficulty in forgetting who
slaughtered whom a century ago.

It would also take the sting out of the repeated eruptions in American
politics over the issue, powered by the US's large Armenian community. Two
years ago, President Bush clashed with a Democrat-led House of
Representatives committee that denounced the 1915 deaths as genocide, even
though a phalanx of former secretaries of state warned about the impact on
relations with Turkey, a crucial ally. If Armenia and Turkey can be talked
down from the embrace of this old conflict, it is even possible that the US
Congress eventually can, too.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ADLP DECLARATION RE: PROTOCOL BETWEEN TURKEY AND ARMENIA


ՌԱՄԿԱՎԱՐ ԱԶԱՏԱԿԱՆ ԿՈՒՍԱԿՑՈՒԹԵԱՆ
ՅԱՅՏԱՐԱՐՈՒԹԻՒՆԸ ՀԱՅԱՍՏԱՆԻ ԵՒ ԹՈՒՐՔԻՈՅ ՄԻՋԵՒ
ՅԱՐԱԲԵՐՈՒԹԻՒՆՆԵՐՈՒ ՀԱՍՏԱՏՄԱՆ
ՀԱՄԱՁԱՅՆԱԳԻՐԻ ԿԱՊԱԿՑՈՒԹԵԱՄԲ
--
If you wish to unsubscribe from our mailing list please reply to this email with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message

Armenia:Turkey Protocols - Turkish reactions‏

(the Journal of Turkish Weekly site has publshed nothing so far on the protocal news)
ARMENIA-TURKEY PROTOCOLS SEVERELY CRITICIZED AT HOME
Hurriyet Daily News
Sept 1 2009
Turkey

Members of the opposition Nationalist Movement Party, or MHP, and
Republican People's Party, or CHP, voice their unhappiness with the
government's move to restore diplomatic relations with Armenia

Turkey's opposition parties have reacted harshly to a joint statement
saying that two protocols will be inked in six weeks to restore
diplomatic relations and improve bilateral relations with Armenia.

Even if the government signs the protocols, it is impossible to
implement them without parliamentary ratification.

Republican People's Party, or CHP, vice president and retired
ambassador Onur Oymen said Armenia has not sufficiently changed its
policy nor implemented the necessary pre-conditions to allow such a
reconciliation. "Does Armenia officially confirm that it will withdraw
from Nagorno-Karabakh?" he asked Tuesday.

"Prime Minister [Recep Tayyip] Erdogan assured in a speech at
the Azerbaijani parliament that the Turkey-Armenia border would
not be opened until the Karabakh conflict is solved," Oymen said,
referring to the longstanding territorial dispute between Turkey's
neighbors. "However, now you even declare a timetable for opening
the border. How can you convince the Azerbaijanis?"

Saying that Turkey does whatever the United States asks, even at the
cost of losing its credibility and reliability, Oymen added: "It is
incoherent politics and harms the reliability of the country. Armenia
has promised nothing in response to this protocol and so what Turkey
does will be a one-sided concession."

Deniz BölukbaÅ~_ı, a retired ambassador and deputy from the
Nationalist Movement Party, or MHP, also severely criticized the
government policy. "These protocols are like a red carpet to welcome
[Armenian President Serge] Sarkisian, who reiterated his intention
not to come to Turkey until a move was made to open the border,"
BölukbaÅ~_ı said in an interview with Hurriyet's Web site.

Noting that the contents of the protocols do not meet Turkey's
expectations, the MHP representative added: "Armenian constitutional
law considers eastern Turkey as part of Armenian land. There is
no item in the protocols to confirm that Armenia has given up this
approach. Armenia neither promises to withdraw from Nagorno-Karabakh
nor to resolve the problems with Turkey. So it is a one-sided step
."
TURKEY DOESN'T HEAR BAKU VOICE
Aysor
Sept 2 2009
Armenia

The Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan's Chief Advisor Hussein Celik
announced that Turkey will continue establishing diplomatic and
bilateral ties with Armenia regardless of any settlement on Karabakh
conflict, reports the Turkish electronic edition "Sabah".

"Even thought the Karabakh conflict is not resolved Turkey will
continue setting diplomatic ties with Armenia" - H.Celik said.

The Oppositional National-Republican Party of Turkey's Head's assistant
Onur Oymen said the historical process both in Armenian and Turkish
foreign policy started.

The opposition deputy recalled the reason of Armenian-Turkish border
closing. That was the Armenian Armed Forces liberated territory.

"It is clear that the necessity for the border opening is the
Armenian Army withdrawing. However, whether there is an evidence
of that? No. There is just something that Turkey has changed its
foreign policy".

"The policy made in the current situation is dictated by the world
leaders" - Onur Oymen said.

TURKISH, ARMENIAN PRESS PLAY DOWN TIES
BBC NEWS
2009/09/01 11:57:36 GMT


The decision by Turkey and Armenia to establish diplomatic relations
after centuries of hostilities has been given a lukewarm reception
by press commentators in both countries.

Only two Turkish newspapers were noted to have commented on the issue
and both largely welcome the move, but remain sceptical over whether
it will result in anything without consensus from neighbouring nations.

Similarly, only two Armenian opposition dailies commented on the
statement, both highlighting further conditions that they feel need
to be met before the agreement can be fully welcomed. One of the
Armenian dailies expressed stronger objection to the agreement,
citing Turkey's ongoing denial of genocide against Armenians.

SEMIH IDIZ IN TURKEY'S MILLIYET

Turkey and Armenia have taken a bold step and decided to establish
diplomatic relations. This is the message given by yesterday's
statement simultaneously made in Ankara, Yerevan and Bern... It is
assumed that this consensus which has been reached through Swiss
mediation will be met by reactions in the nationalist circles in
both Armenia and Turkey. And it is not known in the current phase
what kind of a preparation Ankara has made in order to convince
Baku [Azerbaijan].

ERDAL SAFAK IN TURKEY'S SABAH

An important detail: the six-week period will expire two days
before the national football match to be played between Turkey and
Armenia
. Our impression is that in case the Armenian President, Serge
Sarkisian, who has made his visit to Turkey for the match conditional
upon the "opening of the [Turkish-Armenian] border", continues to
resist, it is strongly possible that the process may be frozen.

EDITORIAL IN ARMENIA'S HAYKAKAN ZHAMANAK

Serge Sarkisian cannot but fulfil his promises: To go to Turkey...,
to sign a big agreement on the Nagorno Karabakh issue, and to wait
for Turkey finally to fulfil its promise to open its border.

EDITORIAL IN ARMENIA'S ZHAMANAK

Serge Sarkisian may go to Turkey on 14 October to watch the scheduled
Armenia-Turkey football match, in order to ensure the continuation
of the Armenian-Turkish talks and to prevent them from being aborted,
at any cost.

Taking into consideration Turkey's policy of denying the Armenian
genocide, Armenia is to some extent justifying Turkey's behaviour
in the genocide issue
. The point is that the issue of the genocide
is a national demand, which should not be made an axis of state
policy. State policy should never be carried out at the price of
national feelings, and moreover, it should not contribute to defying
those feelings.

BBC News selects and translates news from radio, television, press, news
agencies and the internet from 150 countries in more than 70
languages. It is based in Caversham, UK, and has several bureaux
abroad.
TURKEY WILL TAKE AZERBAIJAN'S INTEREST INTO ACCOUNT
a1plus.am
12:16 pm, Sep 1, 2009
Turkey will take Azerbaijan's interest into account

"The opening of the Turkish-Armenian border is not foreseen in this
stage," Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmed Davudoghlu said
during an
interview with the NTV television commenting on the progress registered
in the establishment of relations between both countries.

Let us remind that the two protocols to be signed after the 6-week
political consultations (see www.a1plus.am) will be presented for the
confirmation of both parliaments and the Turkish-Armenian border will
be opened within 2 months after the protocols are signed.

"Turkey is aimed at having friendly ties with its neighboring
countries, as well as establish peace and stability in the region,"
said Davudoghlu.

However, the Turkish Foreign Minister announced: "Ankara will take
Azerbaijan's interests into account in each stage of the normalization
of relations with Armenia."

France has already qualified the improvement of Turkish-Armenian
relations as a "historical event".

The U.S. State Department "warmly welcomed" the steps taken by Armenia
and Turkey toward normalization of relations and called on speeding up
the process. In case of need, the U.S. has expressed the willingness
to support the governments of both countries "in the solution to
the conflict."
KARABAKH ISSUE TOUCHED UPON IN TURKEY-AZERBAIJAN TALKS
armradio.am
31.08.2009 17:43


Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev and visiting top Turkish diplomats
had talks in Baku over the weekend on recent developments in the
Caucasus, the Anatolia news agency reported. The meeting among Aliyev,
Foreign Ministry Undersecretary Ambassador Feridun Sinirlioglu and
Ambassador Unal Ceviköz, the deputy undersecretary for the Caucasus
and Central Asia, was held on Saturday following a Friday telephone
conversation between Aliyev and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip
Erdogan.

During Friday's conversation Erdogan briefed Aliyev on normalization
efforts between Turkey and Armenia, while Aliyev informed Erdogan
about developments regarding the resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh
dispute between Armenia and Azerbaijan, Prime Minister Erdogan's
office said in a written statement.

Ahead of their departure from Baku later on Saturday, Sinirlioglu told
reporters that they explained Turkey's views to Aliyev concerning
both the normalization efforts between Turkey and Armenia and the
resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute between Armenia and
Azerbaijan, without elaborating further, Today's Zaman reported.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Armenia:Turkey Protocols - Armenian reports‏

PUBLIC DISCUSSIONS ON ARMENIAN-TURKISH RELATIONS IMPORTANT
armradio.am
01.09.2009 15:38


"We have tried to normalize our relations with the neighbor country
with dignity as it befits the civilized world of the 21st century,"
President Serzh Sargsyan declared in his speech at the annual meeting
of the representatives of the central apparatus of the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs and the heads of Armenia's diplomatic representations.

Serzh Sargsyan reminded that the Republic of Armenia and the
Republic of Turkey have agreed to start their internal political
consultations on the two protocols - the "Protocol on the establishment
of diplomatic relations" and the "Protocol on the development of
bilateral relations." The two documents reflect the summary of the
agreements reached so far.

According to the President the protocols made public on the eve
reflect three core realities.

1. "I have stated on different occasions that our talks with Turkey
and the agreements reached include no precondition connected with
the peaceful settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh issue.

2. As we were assuring, the historical issues between Armenia and
Turkey will be discussed in the format of one of the sub-commissions
of the intergovernmental commission, not a commission of historians.

3. For the first time in the history of independent Armenia the
signing of important international documents wil l be preceded by
public discussions. These will provide an opportunity to listen to
all opinions and approaches."

The President noted that he attaches importance to the activeness of
the diplomats on the issue.

"You should be active during those public discussions both in Armenia
and the Diaspora. You have to outline and clarify the provisions of
the protocols.

I expect active discussions in the Diaspora Armenian communities and
international research centers," Serzh Sargsyan stated.

Who Will Blink First; Armenia or Turkey?
By Harut Sassounian
Publisher, The California Courier

After months of rampant rumors and news leaks, the Foreign Ministries
of Armenia and Turkey, with Switzerland as mediator, issued a joint
statement on August 31, making public the text of two protocols
intended to regulate their problematic relationship.

In a previous joint statement released on April 22, Armenian and
Turkish officials stated that they had agreed to a `roadmap' which was
to normalize their relations `within a reasonable timeframe.' At the
time, the two sides had indicated their agreement in principle by
`initialing' the two protocols, the text of which was not published
until August 31. This lengthy delay was due to Turkey backing down from
the `roadmap' under pressure from Azerbaijan. Pres. Aliyev had insisted
that Turkey keep its border with Armenia closed until the Karabagh
(Artsakh) conflict is resolved.

During the ensuing months, in the absence of any progress in
Armenian-Turkish relations, there was widespread speculation on whether
Pres. Serzh Sargsyan would agree to travel to Turkey on October 14, to
attend the World Cup qualifying soccer match between the national teams
of the two countries. The Armenian President attempted to pressure
Turkey to keep its end of the bargain in the declared `roadmap,' by
announcing that he would go to Turkey only if the border were open, or
on the threshold of being opened.

The American government was also pressuring Turkey to move forward with
the envisaged agreement with Armenia. In recent days, Secretary of
State Hillary Clinton telephoned both Pres. Sargsyan and Turkish
Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, to help overcome any remaining
stumbling blocks. Since Pres. Obama had broken his campaign promise by
not using the term `Armenian Genocide' in his April 24 statement, under
the pretext that doing so would undermine the on-going `delicate'
negotiations between Armenia and Turkey, the United States sought some
progress in these two countries' relations, as a face saving measure
for the American President.

As a result, Armenia and Turkey disclosed for the first time on August
31 the actual text of the two protocols and announced that they `have
agreed to start their internal political consultations' on the
`Protocol on the establishment of diplomatic relations' and the
`Protocol on the development of relations.' These consultations are to
be completed within six weeks, after which the two states will sign and
submit these Protocols to their respective Parliaments for ratification.
The first Protocol commits the two sides to open their common border
and to establish diplomatic relations. It also requires Armenia and
Turkey to recognize `the existing border between the two countries as
defined by the relevant treaties of international law.' This is an
important requirement for Ankara as it seeks to put an end to Armenian
claims to `historic Armenian lands,' now part of the territory of the
Republic of Turkey
. On the other hand, many Armenians would reject this
provision, as they want to leave the door open for future claims on the
usurped territories, including Mount Ararat.

The second Protocol contains the most controversial element of both
documents. It states that Armenia and Turkey `agree to implement a
dialogue on the historical dimension with the aim to restore mutual
confidence between the two nations, including an impartial scientific
examination of the historical records and archives to define existing
problems and formulate recommendations.' An `intergovernmental
bilateral commission' would first be established, comprised of several
sub-commissions, one of which would deal with `historical' issues. A
`Timetable' attached to the second Protocol further specifies that
Armenian, Turkish as well as Swiss and other international experts
shall take part' in the deliberations of `the sub-commission on the
historical dimension.'

These two Protocols are bound to raise serious concerns and could cause
major political turmoil within Azerbaijan, Turkey, and Armenia.
Pres. Aliyev would most probably once again go on a rampage against
Turkey, as he did during the announcement of the first `roadmap' on
April 22.
Given Azerbaijan's valuable energy resources and their
transit through Turkey, Ankara's leaders can ill-afford to ignore
Aliyev's temper tantrums!

There could also be turmoil within Turkey as both the political
opposition and elements of the `deep state' may organize massive
demonstrations and denounce Pres. Gul and Prime Minister Erdogan for
being unpatriotic and favoring relations with Armenia over `brotherly'
Azerbaijan.
Such accusations could chip away just enough votes from the
ruling majority in the Turkish Parliament to reject the ratifica
tion of the Protocols.

Ratification is also not a foregone conclusion in Armenia. For more
than a year, many Armenians both in Armenia and the Diaspora have
vigorously complained to the government about the wisdom of negotiating
such an agreement. They objected to the plan to establish a
sub-commission on `historical' issues, which by its very nature would
cast doubt on the veracity of the Armenian Genocide. In addition, many
Armenians do not accept `the existing border' with Turkey, in order not
to preclude future Armenian territorial claims. The apprehension
created by this document could lead to large demonstrations both inside
and outside of Armenia and cause serious political dissension,
jeopardizing Armenia's stability and security.

Given the pressure brought to bear on the Armenian government by
Russia, the United States, and Europe, it will not be easy for Yerevan
to back down from going forward with this agreement.
Nevertheless, all
is not lost. It is wholly possible that as a result of a sharp
confrontation between Azerbaijan and Turkey on this issue, compounded
by domestic opposition to the Gul/Erdogan regime, the Turkish
government may quietly urge its parliamentary majority not to ratify
these Protocols. To maintain the heat on Turkey and force it to blink
first, Armenia should not sign any agreement with Azerbaijan over
Artsakh for the time being. It is also possible that the outcry by
Armenians worldwide against these Protocols would convince the Armenian
government not to go through with this agreement and urge its majority
in Parliament to vote against it.

Unfortunately, the repeated warnings to the Armenian authorities by
this writer and others at the start of these negotiations went
unheeded. It would have been much easier back then to make appropriate
policy adjustments and take corrective measures. Should Armenia back
down from this agreement first, it may bring upon itself the wrath of
the major powers. Nevertheless, at this critical juncture, the Armenian
government's preeminent concern should be safeguarding the country's
national interest rather than earning brownie points from foreign
powers!
ARMENIAN PRESIDENT UPBEAT OVER AGREEMENT WITH TURKEY
RIA Novosti
18:3401/09/2009

YEREVAN, September 1 (RIA Novosti) - Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan
said on Tuesday the agreement with Turkey to establish diplomatic
relations could boost bilateral ties.

Turkey and Armenia reached agreement on Monday to start "internal
political consultations" on re-establishing diplomatic relations and
opening their borders. The negotiations were mediated by Switzerland.

"The signing of the protocols has brought Armenia closer to the
possibility of settling bilateral ties with Turkey," Sargsyan said
at the opening of an annual meeting of the country's diplomatic corps.

"We have made an attempt to settle relations with our neighbor in
a decent way, as befits the civilized 21st century. I think the
protocols do provide such a possibility," the Armenian president said.

Turkey and Armenia have for the past two years held talks behind closed
doors mediated by Switzerland to normalize bilateral relations. The
two countries agreed to a "roadmap" to normalize their relations
under Swiss mediation this April.

Turkish President Abdullah Gul first visited Yerevan, the capital
of Armenia, last September to watch a football match between the two
countries in their qualifying group for the 2010 World Cup.

Sargsyan, who is expected to travel to Turkey on October 14 to
attend the return match, previously said he would go if the border
has reopened or Turkey has lifted its economic blockade of landlocked
Armenia.

Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu urged on Tuesday a settlement
be found as soon as possible in the long-running conflict between
Armenia and Azerbaijan over Nagorny Karabakh, a mountainous region
in Azerbaijan with a largely Armenian population.
RF FOREIGN MINISTRY HAS POSITIVE ATTITUDE TO ARMENIAN-TURKISH
RAPPROCHEMENT
/PanARMENIAN.Net/
02.09.2009 14:09 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ "RF Foreign Ministry has positively accepted Armenia
and Turkey's willingness to start internal coordination process with
the purpose of signing Protocols on 'Establishing Diplomatic Ties'
and 'Developing Bilateral Relations' ", RA MFA Press and Information
Department says in a release.

"Armenia and Turkey are our friends. We perceive current rapprochement
as a normal process expected for a long time. We'll be happy if
current consultations between two states result in a substantive
arrangement. As shown by preliminary analysis of draft protocols,
elements and implementation time-limits, Ankara and Yerevan are serious
and determined about studying the issues under consideration. Let's
note that none of steps envisaged by those documents can be interpreted
as harmful to a third party," says the statement.

Russian Foreign Ministry finds that the recent serious and mutual
efforts undertaken by Armenian and Turkish leaderships create real
chances for changing current situation and starting constructive
cooperation after a long period of freezing.

"We hope that improvement of ties between two neighbors will liven
up trade-economic relations and positively affect social-economic
situation in both states, especially in times of global financial
recession. Russian official representatives constantly called on
Armenian and Turkish partners to resolve existing conflicts within
such pragmatic logic. It is also important to proceed further
with Armenian-Turkish rapprochement process. That will objectively
contribute to improving situation in the region and strengthening
peace and security," says the release of Russian Foreign Ministry.

AN ACHIEVEMENT OF ARMENIAN DIPLOMACY
Shakeh Avoyan
"Radiolur"
01.09.2009 18:18

This is an achievement of our diplomacy, Turkologist Ruben Safrastyan
said, commenting on the agreement between Armenia and Turkey to start
internal political consultations on the two protocols - the "Protocol
on the establishment of diplomatic relations" and the "Protocol on
the development of bilateral relations." However, he refrains from
calling it victory, because there can be no victories in diplomacy,
there are agreements that can be profitable or not for us.

According to the Director of the Oriental Studies Institute, the
documents are of great importance to Armenia. Why are they positive
and why are they important? Ruben Safrastyan emphasized two main
points. "First, the most important achievement is that the Turkish
diplomacy actually refused from its longstanding policy of linking
the normalization of relations to the Karabakh issue. The documents
make no reference to the Karabakh issue. The second important issue
is that they includes no reference to preventing Armenia's efforts
targeted at the recognition of the Armenian Genocide."

"Our diplomacy should keep to this style. In that case we'll manage
to develop our relations with Turkey without preconditions," Ruben
Safrastyan said.


PRESIDENT OF ARMENIA: WE MUST LOOK FORWARD
BUT WE HAVE NO RIGHT TO FORGET OUR PAST
ArmInfo
2009-08-31 11:25:00

ArmInfo. We do not consider recognition of Genocide as precondition
to establishment of relations with Turkey, President of Armenia Serzh
Sargsyan says in an interview with BBC.

Asked if Armenia is ready for concessions in the issue of the
events of 1915 and their recognition by Turkey as Genocide, the
president said: "It is very important, indeed. It is important for
our nation, for Turkey and for the world. It is important to restore
historical justice. It is important for our nations to establish
normal relations. And after all it is important to prevent that in
future. Nevertheless, we do not consider recognition of the genocide
as a precondition to establishment of relations." In response to the
specifying question if a compromise is possible, S. Sargsyan said: "No.

It must not be considered as compromise. It is not the very case
for speaking of a compromise. We say the following: yes, there was
genocide and irrespective of whether Turkey recognizes that or not,
this fact is recognized by all the genocide specialists in the world
and by many-many countries. In the present condition, we do not
consider it as a precondition to establishing relations with Turks. "

In response to the following comparison that driving a car one must
follow the traffic not forgetting about the side mirror, S. Sargsyan
said: "Yes. I understand what this means. This means that we must
look forward but we have no right to forget our past."


ARMENIAN-TURKISH RECONCILIATION PRESSURED FROM OUTSIDE
PanARMENIAN.Net
31.08.2009 13:42 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ "In the case of the Armenian-Turkish relations the
external pressure is felt, especially on Turkey, because it was the
first to unilaterally close the border, while Armenia has always
advocated the opening of the border without any preconditions,"
Ruben Melkonyan , turkologist and lecturer of Turkic Chair at the
Yerevan State University, told a PanARMENIAN.Net reporter.

According to him, being a very experienced in diplomacy Turkey is
still successfully maneuvering in the international arena, and it
manages to neutralize the external pressure.

In respect to opening the border, Mr. Melkonyan said that not only
the mood of Armenia's public must be taken into account, but also the
interests of Diaspora. "In this context, the position of Diaspora is
more rigid than that of the public of Armenia, which has a logical
explanation. The Armenian community, on the contrary, has a very
superficial understanding of Turkey, the Turkish public and the pluses
and minuses of an open border as a whole," Mr. Melkonyan added.

When asked about the possible economic consequences of the open
borders, he stressed, that since the Armenian economy has a very
large agrarian industry, Armenia might not compete with Turkey,
having more developed agricultural production
LEADER OF HERITAGE PARTY PARLIAMENTARY FACTION:
THE TURKISH PARTY HAS MANAGED TO PUT THEIR
PRE-CONDITIONS FORWARD
ArmInfo
2009-09-01 14:55:00

ArmInfo. Nevertheless the Turkish party has managed to put their
pre-conditions forward for normalization of relations with Armenia,
the leader of the Heritage party parliamentary faction, Armen
Martirosyan, told ArmInfo correspondent when commenting on signing
of the two protocols between Armenia and Turkey: "Protocol on the
establishment of diplomatic relations" and "Protocol on development
of bilateral relations".

'Armenian authorities could not protect its national and state
interests.

But the leadership of Turkey managed to gain the situation when 2
pre-conditions put forward by Turkey were accepted by the Armenian
party: recognition of the state borders of Turkey and agreement to
create the joint commission of historians to study the fact of the
Armenian genocide', - Martirosyan said and added he wonders why 6
weeks timeframe was fixed for establishment of diplomatic relations. 'I
think this is directly connected with the Karabakh conflict settlement
process, i.e. the Turkish party thinks there will be certain progress
over that period of time, naturally not in favor of Armenia', -
he said and added that only Turkey won as a result of all this process.

To recall, Armenia and Turkey have agreed to complete political
consultations within six weeks, following which the two Protocols:
the "Protocol on the establishment of diplomatic relations" and the
"Protocol on the development of bilateral relations" - which have been
initiated in the course of their efforts under Swiss mediation, will be
signed and submitted to the respective Parliaments for the ratification
on each side. The parties have agreed to set up an impartial group
to study the archived documents to define the existing problems and
develop recommendations.
VLADIMIR KARAPETIAN: DRAFT ARMENIAN-TURKISH PROTOCOLS
CONTAIN DANGEROUS PRECONDITIONS
Noyan Tapan
Sep 1, 2009

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 1, NOYAN TAPAN. The draft Armenian-Turkish
protocols, which envisage normalization of bilateral relations,
contain preconditions undesirable for the Armenian side. Vladimir
Karapetian, Armenian National Congress Foreign Relations Executive,
stated this. In his words, "the Armenian authorities have accepted
the precondition put forward by the Turkish side on creation of an
Armenian-Turkish subcommission of historians, which can greatly hinder
the international recognition of the Armenian Genocide."

According to the protocol on development of bilateral relations, in
addition to the others, an intergovernmental commission not engaged
in the historic plane should be created. Its function is "fulfillment
of a dialogue aimed at mutual confidence between the two peoples."

V. Karapetian reminded that as far back as in 2005 Turkish Prime
Minister Erdogan proposed creating a bilateral commission of historians
to study the facts of the Genocide. However the Armenian authorities
of that time declined that proposal.

According to V. Karapetian, it is also alarming that these two
protocols after being signed should be submitted for ratification by
the parliaments.

In his words, it is not a procedure accepted in international
practice. It will give the Turkish side a possibility to constantly
delay protocols' coming in force and to find new preconditions for
that process: for instance, to link normalization of Armenian-Turkish
relations with the Nagorno Karabakh settlement.

Do Not Ratify!

By Dikran Abrahamian BA, MD, Ontario,

1 September 2009

Here we are, almost a year following the start of the “football diplomacy”
and we are reaping the “gifts”. Finally, the wrapping of the package is
opened and we have a glimpse of what are in it.

As highlighted elsewhere by others, a “Commission of historians” and de jure

recognition of the present borders between Turkey and Armenia are in the works.

They are no more secrets. The spinners and the critics will have a field day. Alas!

Are we supposed to be shocked or surprised? Not at all!

Granted, Keghart had no means of being cognizant of the details of the negotiations.

However, following the trend established since the infamous February 2008 elections,

the subsequent March tragedy, the unrelenting stubbornness of the present authorities,

it was clear that the government did not represent the will of the majority of its people.

To save its neck, eventually it had to succumb to foreign pressures to establish some

form of legitimacy. Unfortunately, that is what we witness today.

It is hard to imagine how the authorities will be able to manage to convince the people

in Armenia and the Diaspora of the wisdom of this action. The only way will be to ram

it down the throat of the parliament. Will they take the risk with all its future ramifications

of further alienation?

So far, at every step of the way, they have demonstrated an extraordinary but pathological

audacity. They are incorrigible. Hence, with regret and sadness, along with frustration and

indignation, we state that they, in all likelihood, will not change course. They cannot, anyway.

They are signatories. There is no room to backtrack and make an about face.

Now the ball is in the parliament.

We ask, like a demand, from all the parliamentarians in Armenia not to ratify this unjust

agreement.

Forget about your personal gains. Leave aside what you have amassed by way of bribes

and promises. Dismiss your pockets.

Think for a moment what a calamitous event for Armenians worldwide you will be facing

by ratifying the agreement.

Consult with all those martyrs who throughout our tortured history sacrificed their lives to

keep a piece of land and our dignity.

Ask their advice!

(was the following article filed just before the announcement?)
Sarkisian Sees No `Turkish Desire' to Follow Arrangement
Armenia -- President Serzh Sarkisian, undated
31.08.2009
Hovannes Shoghikian

Armenian President Serzh Sarkisian has chided Turkey for not seeking
in earnest to keep to the arrangements on an unconditional
normalization of bilateral ties, again warning that he will not
accept Ankara's invitation to attend a soccer event later this year
unless the latter moves to reopen the border.

`We have arrangements, and I think it is only right that the parties
keep to them. Unfortunately, I have not yet seen any great desire or
aspiration [from Turkey] to keep to these arrangements,' Sarkisian
said in an interview with the BBC published on Monday.

The Armenian leader reiterated his earlier statements that he will
not travel to Turkey in October to watch the match of the two
countries' national soccer teams unless Ankara moves to reopen the
Turkish-Armenian border.

Turkish President Abdullah Gul extended a relevant invitation to
Sarkisian after paying a historic visit to Yerevan in September last
year, during which the two leaders jointly attended the first Armenia-
Turkey game. The so-called `soccer diplomacy' ushered in a Turkish-
Armenian rapprochement that left the two historical foes on the verge
of normalizing their strained relations earlier this year.

Sarkisian's remarks reflect the growing frustration of the Armenian
political leadership with Turkey's failure so far to unconditionally
establish diplomatic relations and reopen its border with Armenia.
Yerevan insists that the Turks drop their preconditions for
normalizing bilateral ties that apparently include Armenian
concessions to Azerbaijan in the settlement of the long-running
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and an end to the Armenian campaign for the
world governments to recognize World War I-era killings and
deportations of Armenians in Ottoman Turkey as genocide.

The fence-mending process between Yerevan and Ankara hailed by the
international community resulted in the signing of a `roadmap' to
normalizing bilateral ties in April. Yet, in recent months, Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and other Turkish leaders have said
that the Turkish-Armenian border will remain closed as long as the
conflict with Azerbaijan over the Nagorno-Karabakh region remains
unresolved.

The Turkish rhetoric has led some political circles in Armenia,
notably the nationalist Armenian Revolutionary Federation party, to
call for an end to negotiations with Turkey. Sarkisian has also been
urged not to go to Turkey unless Ankara gives a clear indication that
it is still ready to normalize relations without preconditions.

Some six weeks before the return match in Turkey, which is scheduled
for October 14, Sarkisian told the BBC: `I repeat what I've already
stated twice, i.e. I will go to Turkey to attend the soccer game if
our border is already open, or if we are close to that. That is, if
the Turks respect our arrangements, this will be one thing, if they
don't, this will be a different thing.'

`Our desire remains the same - to establish relations without any
preconditions,' added Sarkisian.

To the BBC's question whether Armenians were ready for concessions by
dropping their longstanding claims that the Ottoman-era massacres of
Armenians constituted genocide, Sarkisian said: `Of course, it is
very important, it is important for our people, important for Turkey
and the whole world. It is important that historical justice be
restored, it is important that our nations manage to establish normal
relations and, finally, it is important that such things should not
recur in the future. However, we do not view genocide recognition as
a precondition.'

The Armenian leader, however, stopped short of describing this stance
as a `compromise'.

`It is not the case when one can talk about a compromise. We say -
yes, there was genocide, and no matter whether Turkey today admits
that or not, this is a fact that is recognized by all specialists on
genocides in the world; it is recognized by many countries of the
world. But in current conditions, we do not view it as a precondition
for establishing relations with the Turks,' he said.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thursday, 3 September 2009

Text of Protocols singed by Armenia and Turkey‏

ARMENIAN AND TURKISH PROTOCOLS
as published by Lragir
11:15:17 - 01/09/2009

Armenian Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued two protocols signed by
Armenia and Turkey under Swiss mediation
.

Protocol on the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations between the
Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Turkey.

The Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Turkey.

Desiring to establish good neighbourly relations and to develop
bilateral cooperation in the political, economic, cultural and other
fields for the benefit of their peoples, as envisaged in the Protocol
on the development of relations signed on the same day.

Referring to their obligations under the Charter of the United Nations,
the Helsinki Final Act, the Charter of Paris for a New Europe,

Reconfirming their commitment, in their bilateral and international
relations, to respect and ensure respect for the principles of
equality, sovereignty, non-intervention in internal affairs of other
states, territorial integrity and inviolability of frontiers,

Bearing in mind the importance of the creation and maintenance of an
atmosphere of trust and confidence between the two countries that will
contribute to the strengthening of peace, security and stability of the
whole region, as well as being determined to refrain from the threat
of the use of force, to promote the peaceful settlement of disputes,
and to protect human rights and fundamental freedoms,

Confirming the mutual recognition of the existing border between the
two countries as defined relevant treaties of international law,

Emphasizing their decisions to open the common border,

Reiterating their commitment to refrain from pursuing any policy
incompatible with the spirit of good neighbourly relations,

Condemning all forms of terrorism, violence and extremism irrespective
of their cause, pledging to refrain from encouraging and tolerating
such acts and to cooperate against them,

Affirming their willingness to chart a new pattern and course for
their relations on the basis of common interests, goodwill and in
pursuit of peace, mutual understanding and harmony,

Agree to establish diplomatic relations as of the date of the entry
into force of this Protocol accordance with the Vienna Convention on
Diplomatic Relations of 1961 and to exchange Diplomatic Missions.

This Protocol and the Protocol on the Development of Bilateral
Relations between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Turkey
shall enter into force on the same day, i.e. on the first day of the
first month following of instruments of ratification.

Signed in (place) on (date) in Armenian, Turkish and English languages
authentic copies in duplicate. In case of divergence of interpretation,
the English text shall prevail.

For the Republic of Armenia

For the Republic of Turkey

Protocol on Development of Relations between the Republic of Armenia
and the Republic of Turkey.

The Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Turkey.

Guided by the Protocol on the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations
between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Turkey signed on
the same day,

Considering the perspectives of developing their bilateral relations,
based on confidence and respect to their mutual interests,

Determining to develop and enhance their bilateral relations, in the
political, economic, energy, transport, scientific, technical, cultural
issues and other fields, based on common interest of both countries,

Supporting the promotion of the cooperation between the two countries,
in the international and regional organi9zations, especially within the
framework of the UN, the OSCE, the Council of Europe, the Euro-Atlantic
Partnership Council and the BSEC,

Taking into account the common purpose of both States to cooperate for
enchancimg regional stability and security for ensuring the democratic
and sustainable development of the region,

Reiterating their commitment to the peaceful settlement of regional
and international disputes and the conflicts on the basis of the
norms and principles of law,

Reaffirming their readiness to actively support the actions of eth
international community in addressing common security threats to
the region and world security and stability, such as terrorism,
transnational organized crimes, illicit trafficking of drugs and arms,

1. Agree to open the common border within 2 months after the entry
into force of this Protocol,

2. Agree to conduct regular political consultations between the
Ministries of Foreign Affairs of the two countries;

implement a dialogue on the historical dimension with the aim
to restore mutual confidence between the two nations, including
an impartial scientific examination of the historical records and
archives to define existing problems and formulate recommendations;

make the best possible use of existing transport, communications
and energy infrastructure and networks between the two countries,
and to undertake measures in this regard;

develop the bilateral legal framework in order to foster cooperation
between the two countries;

cooperate in the fields of science and education by encouraging
relations between the appropriate institutions as well as promoting
the exchange of specialists and students, and act with the aim of
preserving the cultural heritage of both sides and launching common
cultural projects;

establish consular cooperation in accordance with the Vienna Convention
on Consular Relations of 1963 in order to provide necessary assistance
and protection to the citizens of the two countries;

take concrete measures in order to develop trade, tourism and economic
cooperation between the two countries; engage in a dialogue and
reinforce their cooperation on environmental issues.

3. Agree on the establishment of an intergovernmental bilateral
commission which shall comprise separate sub-commissions for the
prompt implementation of the commitments mentioned in operational
paragraph 2 above in this Protocol. To prepare the working modalities
of the intergovernmental commission and its sub-commissions, a
working group headed by the two Ministers of Foreign Affairs shall
be created 2 months after the day following the entry into force of
this Protocol. Within 3 months after the entry into force of this
Protocol, these modalities shall be approved at ministerial level. The
intergovernmental commission shall meet for the first time immediately
after the adoption of the said modalities. The sub-commissions shall
start their work at the latest 1 month thereafter and they shall work
continuously until the completion of their mandates. The timetable
and elements agreed by both sides for the implementation of this
Protocol are mentioned in the annexed document, which is integral
part of this Protocol.

This Protocol and the Protocol on the Establishment of Diplomatic
Relations between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Turkey
shall enter into force on the same day, i.e. on the first day of the
first month following the exchange of instruments of ratification.

Signed in (place) on (date) in Armenian, Turkish and English authentic
copies in duplicate. In case of divergence of interpretation, the
English text shall prevail.

For the Republic of Armenia

For the Republic of Turkey

Annexed document: Timetable and elements for the implementation of
the Protocol on development of relations between the Republic of
Armenia and the Republic of Turkey.

Timetable and elements for the implementation of the Protocol on
development of relations between the Republic of Armenia and the
Republic of Turkey

Steps to be undertaken

Timing

1. to open the common border within 2 months after the entry into
force of the Protocol on the development of relations between the
Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Turkey

2. to establish a working group headed by the two Ministers of Foreign
Affairs to prepare the working modalities of the intergovernmental
commission and its sub-commission

2 months after the day following the entry into force of the Protocol
on the development of relations between the Republic of Armenia and
the Republic of Turkey

3. to approve the working modalities of the intergovernmental
commission and its sub-commissions at ministerial level

within 3 months after the entry into force of the Protocol on
the development of relations between the Republic of Armenia and
the Republic of Turkey 4. to organize the first meeting of the
intergovernmental commission

immediately after the adoption of the working modalities of the
intergovernmental commission and its sub-commissions at ministerial
level

5. to operate the following sub-commissions:

the sub-commission on political consultations; the sub-commission on
transport, communications and energy infrastructure and networks;
the sub-commission on legal matters; the sub-commission on science
and education; the sub-commission on trade, tourism and economic
cooperation; the sub-commission on environmental issues: and the
sub-commission on the historical dimension to implement a dialogue
with the aim to restore mutual confidence between the two nations,
including an impartial scientific examination of the historical records
and archive to define existing problems and formulate recommendations,
in which Armenian, Turkish as well as Swiss and other international
experts shall take part.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Dangers of the Proposed Protocols on Armenian-Turkey Dialogue - ANCA

September 2, 2009


Dangers of the Proposed Protocols on
Armenian-Turkey Dialogue | Watch |


Take Action: Protest U.S. Pressure on Armenia to Accept "Historical Commission"

1) ANCA Warns Capitol Hill About Dangers of Turkey-Armenia "Protocols"

2) Schiff Calls on Turkey to Recognize Genocide

3) In the News: "Denying the 'other' Holocaust",
Jerusalem Post - 8/29/2009


ANCA Warns Capitol Hill About Dangers of Turkey-Armenia "Protocols"

-- Alerts Legislators about Pressure on Yerevan to Accept Terms that Threaten Armenia’s Security

WASHINGTON, DC – The Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA) today shared with Members of Congress the reservations of the Armenian American community regarding a recent set of secretly-negotiated, Swiss-brokered, protocols between Turkey and Armenia regarding the normalization of their bilateral relations.

In a September 1, 2009 memo to Senate and House offices, ANCA Executive Director Aram Hamparian reviewed these concerns, alerted these offices to the undue pressure applied to Armenia to accept dangerous concessions, and informed legislators on both sides of Capitol Hill about Turkey’s rapid backtracking from even the minor commitments it had undertaken in these agreements.

In the note, Hamparian stressed that, “Among [the ANCA’s] primary concerns is that Armenia, blockaded by Turkey and under intense economic and diplomatic pressure, was forced into accepting terms that threaten her interests, rights, safety, and future – very notably in the form of a proposed ‘historical commission.’” He added that, “This provision, a tactic long pursued by Ankara to cast doubt on the historical record of the Armenian Genocide, is intended to serve Turkey’s drive to roll back the growing tide of international recognition of this crime against humanity. There can be no enduring relationship between Armenia and Turkey that is not built upon the foundation of Turkey’s acceptance of a true and just resolution of this crime.” Read More. . .

Take Action: Protest U.S. Pressure on Armenia to Accept "Historical Commission"


Schiff Calls on Turkey to Recognize Genocide

WASHINGTON— Reacting to the Monday’s announcement of protocols for the establishment and development of relations between Armenia and Turkey, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said true reconciliation will occur when Turkey recognizes the Genocide.

“While I welcome what may be an important step in the rapprochement between Armenia and Turkey and hope that the upcoming talks result in a swift opening of full diplomatic and commercial relations between Ankara and Yerevan, as well as a reopening of the border, I have serious concerns about some provisions of the protocols accompanying the announcement,” said Schiff on Tuesday.

“In particular, I was deeply disappointed to see that the protocols call for the creation of an historical commission to review the events of 1915-23. This is a thoroughly discredited idea; there is no dispute among scholars that the Armenian people were the subject of genocide during the waning days of the Ottoman Empire and an historical commission is another effort to obfuscate the truth,” added Schiff.

“Turkey cannot be allowed to re-write this tragic part of its history as a price for normal relations with Armenia. To do so means acquiescence in a charade that demeans the memory of so many victims,” explained the Congressman.

“True reconciliation between the Armenian and Turkish peoples will occur when Turkey acknowledges the genocide that was committed by the Ottoman Empire against Armenians from 1915 – 1923. The Armenian Genocide, the first genocide of the 20th Century, resulted in the deaths of 1.5 million Armenian men, women and children and the sorrow that the Armenian people carry in their hearts cannot be healed by diplomatic relations alone,” reaffirmed Schiff.


Denying the 'other' Holocaust

August 29, 2009 | Marilyn Henry
THE JERUSALEM POST

Ten years ago, I was in Armenia for Genocide Memorial Day. Armenians from their "galut" around the world had come to Yerevan to participate with local citizens in the solemn commemoration. I was with a group that came from the US, including Henry Morgenthau III. He was there because the government intended to honor his grandfather, the first Henry, who as the US ambassador to Constantinople in 1915 had raised the alarm about the Armenian genocide.

The Morgenthaus and I were Jews among the Armenians. After a week together, however, it was hard to remember that the Armenians weren't Jews. We have much in common: lost families, lost homes, lost countries, lost languages, lives as minorities, a diaspora, fears of assimilation, factions in religious practice - and genocide, as well as foes who would deny that the genocide ever happened.

BUT THIS also is where Jews and Armenians part. No civilized society will tolerate Holocaust denial. Nearly a century later, however, denial of the Armenian genocide persists, and it pops up in the most unexpected places.

Most recently it was in the federal appeals court in California. In a ruling on August 20, two members of a three-judge appellate panel did not quite deny the Armenian genocide; it was more like "genocide squelching." At issue was one of a handful of California laws that collectively extended the statutes of limitations so that Nazi victims, including slave laborers, as well as victims of the Armenian genocide, would have additional time to file various claims for redress from human rights abuses and other losses.
Read more. . .


GoodSearch: You Search...We Give!

GoodShop: You Shop...We Give!

Search the web with www.goodsearch.com and money from Yahoo advertisers will go to the ANCA without you spending a dime. A penny per search! Use www.goodshop.com for online purchases from hundreds of popular sites and a percentage comes back to the ANCA.

When you GoodSearch & GoodShop - Choose the ANCA !


Published by the Armenian National Committee of America
1711 N Street NW, Washington, DC 20036
Tel: (202) 775-1918, Fax: (202) 775-5648, E-mail:
anca@anca.org, Web: www.anca.org


Disclaimer: This message was distributed to the "ANCA News" list. If you received this message in error or would like to be removed from the list, please send an email to anca_list@capwiz.mailmanager.net or click below. Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience this may have caused. Please forward this message only to friends and family, who you know would be interested in this issue. Please note that sending unsolicited e-mail is considered "spam" and is illegal.