Friday, 8 July 2011

Սուրբ Յակոբ Կիրակնօրեայ Դպրոց Sourp Hagop Sunday School


Parev,


After 10 years, our website needed a new look, and it got it!


Since our inception on December 10, 2000, we had used the Arasan Armenian font, to create more than the 1000 pages of our website. However, the introduction of Windows 7 with a 64 bit operating system, made Arasan unusable for our visitors, as such we had to make the investment in time to change our content to enable our visitors to read it, with no additonal fonts. As such on the 10th anniversary of our website, instead of having a party and cutting the 10th anniversary cake, our volunteers embarked on the project to convert our content to Sylfaen, first we kept the same look, and than we decided to give www.sourphagop.org the new look it deserved...


We will still need some time to convert all content to the new format and new look, as such we have made the old content still available, until it has been completely replaced...


I thank all the volunteers who in the past 10 years have made www.sourphagop.org the success it has been. I am sure they will continue to help us for the next 10 years as well.


Toros Babikian

Director

Armenian Church Sourp Hagop Sunday School

Montreal


or


Sourp Hagop Sunday School


10 տարիներ ետք, մեր կայքէջը նոր տեսք ունեցաւ:


Մեր գործարկումէն որ սկսաւ Դեկտեմբերի 10 - ին, 2000 թ, մենք օգտագործեցինք Արասան հայերեն տառատեսակը, եւ ստեղծեցինք աւելի քան 1000 էջեր: Սակայն Windows 7 (64 biy)ի ներմուծումով, Արասանը անգործածելի եղաւ մեր այցելուներուն համար:

Մեր տասնամեակի առիթով՝ Դեկտեմբեր 10, 2010ին, մեր կամաւորները որոշեցին մեր բովանդակութիւնը փոխել Sylfaenի: Նախ պահեցինք նոյն տեսքը, սակայն վերջապէս որոշեցինք նոր տեսք մը տալ www. sourphagop.org որուն արժանի էր...


Մենք դեռ որոշ ժամանակ պիտ պահենք նաեւ հին տեսքը, մինչեւ ամբողջացնենք լման բովանդակութեան փոխարինումը Sylfaenի:


Շնորհակալություն բոլոր կամաւորներին, որոնք վերջին 10 տարիներու ընթացքին սատարեցին www.sourphagop.org ի յաջողութեան: Վստահ եմ, որ անոնք պիտի շարունակեն օգնել մեզի յաջորդ 10 տարիներու ընթացքին ալ:


Թորոս Պապիկեան

Տնօրէն՝

Հայաստանեայց Եկեղեցւոյ Սուրբ Յակոբ Կիրակնօրեայ Դպրոց

Մոնթրեալ


Thursday, 7 July 2011

FATHER FRANK’S RANTS - Next Big Thing - A PREDICTION


Rant Number 447 6 July 2011


Poverty to worsen in Welsh valleys! Desperate jobseekers! Public sector squeezes drains people of hope! Students in debt! And so on. Not just in Wales but in Britain as a whole. And it is going to get worse.

Doom and gloom are all around in the Britain that was once great. But the priest has the brightest of all bright ideas. I know how to fix poverty, unemployment, student debt, joblessness, the lot. The next big idea – I have got it!

Insight flashed from a pellucid paragraph in Anthony Daniels’ brisk Zanzibar to Timbuktu. A man in the Nigerian state of Sokoto was arrested for trying ‘to sell his son to another man’. Don’t rush to condemn the fellow: it was a time of economic hardship, you see?

The penny dropped. That’s it! That nifty Nigerian guy, unjustly apprehended by the benighted authorities, blazed a trail. The unemployed, the poor, the debt-laden students now can lift themselves up by their own bootstraps. Snap out of despondency! How? Have a child and sell it. Or two children. Or three. More cash to be made. Excellent. A burgeoning industry beckons. Profits. Enlightened self-interest. Happiness maximised. Superb! This is going to be big, real big, man!

Necessity is the mother of inventions. Child-selling is not new. The comprachicos in Victor Hugo’s The Laughing Man are a case in point. OK, that was three centuries ago. But Curzio Malaparte’s fact-based novel, The Skin, harks back to 1944. Set in Naples after the ‘Liberation’, it shows the utter misery and degradation in which the Neapolitans had fallen because of the war. Malaparte narrates how wretched, starving mothers were reduced to selling their young children for a pittance to the Moroccan soldiers in the French Army. For purposes perhaps less than paternal. An extreme, lamentable case. But there is no need for things to get so dire. Child-selling can be done properly, decently and in order. As a fair business transaction. On e-Bay. And Facebook. You can tweet it. Put an ad in the papers – if you are really old-fashioned. Regardless, you can make money – we are, after all, a capitalist society. Built on buying and selling. Why should only the bloody bankers get all the lolly? Let little people make a bit of cash, for goodness’ sake! The seller sells and the buyer buys and gets what he wants.

The child....hmmm, let me figure that out.

A child’s best interest...Why wouldn’t that be served by being given to another man, or woman? So long as they are, as they say, caring...Biological parenthood is considered old fashioned, anyway. A Times editorial yesterday attacked the superstition of the ‘preservation of the biological family’. ‘Pink parents’ (gays) are spreading, anyway. ‘Social’ parenting can work out best in adoption, so, what’s so wrong about selling and buying a child, eh?

It would be illegal, yes. But that’s no ultimate bar, surely. Many things were once illegal and they no longer are. Abortion was illegal – now no more. Ditto with same sex unions. Good. People progress. Evolve. Improve. In time, shortly, people will come to see the virtue, the utility, I daresay the beauty of the next big thing – child selling.

Human Rights activists would make trouble, I figure. But look here. The HR industry does not object to abortion, does it? That is kosher in their book. It is all right to terminate a life in the womb, right? But would it not be better to let that child be born? To give that live being a chance of a better life with prosperous parents? If the foetus could be asked, do you not think it would prefer to live, rather than to die? Wouldn’t you?

Bertrand Russell once said he never understood the argument that it is better to exist than not to exist. I wonder. Soon science might be able to make contact with the baby in the womb. Ask him – in the appropriate, instinctive, sub-rational ways – whether he prefers life to death. Methinks the tiny thing might well opt for living, pace philosophy.

189.100 babies were ‘terminated’ in 2009. They were, presumably, unwanted. But, if the mother had realised she could make some cash out of the little blighter, might she not have had an incentive to make him live?

Today the State and our fiendish, PC Local Authorities have a monopoly on things like adoption. They also grab vulnerable children away from families deemed unsuitable. Dogmatically determine, on racial grounds, whether blacks can adopt whites or the other way around. This is intolerable, totalitarian and racist. Let private enterprise regulate matters, instead of a clapped out, discredited public sector. If you can sell a cat or a puppy, why not your child? They are all yours. Private property is a fundamental right of man, as John Locke stipulated. Private enterprise is the key to a nation’s wealth. People are essentially buyers and consumers, so let us sell and buy children, too. Verily, this will be the Next Big Thing.

Prejudice of course will raise its ugly head. Like in Michel Houellebecq’s visionary novel, Platform. The controversial, Islam-hating French writer postulates the creation of Aphrodite Clubs. Basically, offering sex-based travel tours to the Third...oops! I mean, the developing world. With the best of intentions. It happens already, anyway, but hypocritically hidden. The idea, again, is to encourage private enterprise, relieve poverty, maximise people’s felicity. Feminism and women’s rights have made many European men miserable. The exotic East offers an inexhaustible reservoir of tame, domesticated females. Would make ideal wives and lovers. And the birds, of both sexes, hanker after life in Europe, a promised land of milk and honey to them. So...why not?

Alas, bourgeois prejudice (and terrorism) spoils it all. People are not ready, yet. But, in the case of child-selling I have no doubt its time will, must come. It is an empirical thing. Poverty and unemployment are not going to go away – no government, of whatever hue, can solve them. Only the people concerned can. In this simple, sensible and rational way.

I hear the cacophonies of protest. Disgusting! Immoral! Illegal! The priest answers: today, perhaps. But, again, society evolves. And the law changes. Empiricism and pragmatism must guide us, not outdated, primitive notions of obligation, natural attachments and the like. A brave new world beckons. And money, money, money galore! Child-selling will be the Next Big Thing!

Revd Frank Julian Gelli


Music of ARMENIA - July NEWSLETTER

Latest News and Updates

Narek Hakhnazaryan Takes the GOLD at The International Tchaikovsky Competition
Cellist Narek Hakhnazaryan wins the Gold Medal at the 14th International Tchaikovsky Competition in Moscow. Click here for more details. Congratulations Narek, we are proud of you!

The World Celebrated Aram Khachaturian's Birthday
We made sure to join them and thank him for his great work.


Interviews

Daniel Bedrosian of Parliament Funkadelic speaks to Hasmik Movsisian about his past, present and future in the game of music. Click here to view the exclusive interview.


Must See Videos

Music of Armenia did yet another exclusive video premiere - Lusine Aghabekyan "Andzrev"
Lusine is the winner of the "Armenian Superstar" Song Contest. Click here to watch the video.

Lucky to have this. What a national treasure!

With summer we all get in the party mood. Here is the best of our traditional music to enjoy. Let's get dancing!




For more news and updates please visit our website.

Welcome to
Music of Armenia
The home for lovers
of Armenian music



Aims and Objectives

• to promote Armenian music and musicians worldwide
• to develop the Armenian music industry
• to encourage development of new genres and styles in the Armenian music industry
• to encourage collaboration of Armenian musicians
• to encourage collaboration of Armenian musicians with musicians from other countries and of other nationalities



Contact us
info@musicofarmenia.com


Invite your friends to join our Mailing List
Join Music of Armenia on FacebookMySpaceYoutubeTwitterBlogger


Tuesday, 5 July 2011

Saturday, 2 July 2011

LOUSSAPATZ 892

To view this document in a new window, please click on the image below. To close the window when you have finished, click on the small 'x' at its top left.


ARTICLE BY HARUT SASSOUNIAN LOS ANGELES, U.S.A.ARTICLE BY HARUT SASSOUNIAN LOS ANGELES, U.S.A.

ՅՕԴՈՒԱԾ ՅԱՐՈՒԹ ՍԱՍՈՒՆԵԱՆԷՆ ԼՈՍ ԱՆՃԵԼԸՍ, Մ. ՆԱՀԱՆԳՆԵՐ

pastedGraphic_2.pdfpastedGraphic_3.pdfpastedGraphic_4.pdf

Friday, 1 July 2011

FATHER FRANK’S RANTS - Gallows Matters


Rant Number 446 29 June 2011


‘How can you, a Christian, be in favour of the death penalty?’ So asked my sweet friend Alexandra. Indeed. A hard question, fitting a hard, perhaps the hardest subject. Angels fear to tread here but...ducking this challenge would be cowardly. The priest will not expose himself to such reproach.

Having just watched on YouTube Mr Abdullah al-Bishi, the official, suave executioner of Saudi Arabia, giving a calm and sensible rationale for his job, I kind of envy his certainties. He quoted the Qur’an – an impeccable procedure for a Muslim. The Christian revelation is more complex.

The Old Testament does permit, even enforce, capital punishment. Pacifists who quote the Decalogue, ‘Thou shalt not kill’, ignore that the same holy law demanded death for a whole lot of offences. Further, the Lord of Hosts permitted his chosen people to fight and kill in war. Hence the Anglican Prayer Book translates the above command as ‘Thou shalt do no murder’ – it is unlawful killing, the killing of the innocent that the Bible forbids, not the dispatching of the guilty.

My brother -a lifelong Communist atheist - however, once reminded me that immediately after Creation God forbade the slaying of mankind’s first murderer and fratricide, Cain. A sevenfold vengeance is threatened on any slayer of Abel’s brother (Genesis 4:13), whose punishment is to be ‘a wanderer and a fugitive upon the earth’. Thanks, brov! I’ll pray for you!

The New Testament does not destroy the Old but fulfils it and perfects it. St John the Baptist, the forerunner, does not tell soldiers to give up soldiering, only to be content with their wages and to wrong no one. Jesus, the Messiah, incarnates and sublimates the spirit of the Law. True, his teaching seems incompatible with any type of killing. Parables where the wicked suffer a violent ending are misunderstood if taken au pied de la lettre – that is not how parables work. And references to swords and violence – ‘the Kingdom of God suffers violence and men of violence take it by force’ – have nothing to do with earthly judicial punishment.

The Book of Revelation offers some frightening and bloody images but his dazzling logic is that of allegory and paradox, e.g. Christ the Lamb slain for the salvation of the world is also called the Lion of Judah – how can a lamb also be a lion, eh?

Above all, Christ’s self-sacrifice on the Cross is the iconic, supreme example of an unjust execution - he was an innocent victim.

St Paul in Romans 13 enjoins his converts to obey the state authorities as God’s representatives. (That rules out Christian anarchism a la’ Leo Tolstoi, by the way.) The Apostle invokes the power of the sword. NT scholars debate whether it was a war sword or a police sword. Anyway, Paul is saying is that a judicially imposed penalty – even death, perhaps – does not contradict divine law: it is actually permissible and just.

Christian revelation encompasses the teachings of Church Fathers. Saints like Augustine and Aquinas defended the power of the sword, meaning necessary killing in a just, defensive war. The example of Christ, however, was always there as a warning, hence Aquinas forbids prelates and clergy to shed blood – a sacramental argument now perhaps obsolete. The Doctor Angelicus conversely pulls no punches about the direct execution of sinners. Groan...medieval monks were tough. Too tough, perhaps.

The Church of England, when she was still serious and meant something, taught that ‘the laws of the realm may punish Christian men with death, for heinous and grievous offences’ (Article XXXVII in BCP). Today she seems to bleat the opposite but then...who really gives a damn?

Heinous and grievous offences. I guess that includes the rape and murder of young girls. A monster guilty of that last week got a life sentence. It prompted the distressed sister of one of the victims to proclaim on TV that justice had not been done. She spoke of ‘an eye for an eye’. Cries for the culprit to be ‘unofficially’ punished in jail were also heard. All that emphasises how Britain is today a sub-Christian, even a non-Christian society.

‘An eye for an eye’ embodies a principle of justice, proportionality. Only one eye to be taken, not two. It looks simple but it is not. How do you punish someone guilty of rape, for example? Do you really want the brute to be violated in return? Or an arsonist? Will you have him burnt alive? But it depends on the case. A court in Iran recently sentenced a man to have acid poured into his face. He had thrown acid into a girl’s face, disfiguring and blinding her. The usual suspects, the ubiquitous ‘human rights’ agitators, raised a protest and the sentence was, I believe, suspended. Yet, looking at the destroyed face of the poor girl, I do not feel like condemning the Iranian court. Not at all. Can’t help it.

Alexandra brought up a standard objection to capital punishment: what if a mistake is made and an innocent person is hanged? It has happened. My response invokes the analogy with war. The human rights fanatics clamour for humanitarian interventions. But they know how in any war the innocent get killed. Collateral damage is the euphemism for that. Yet, they believe war is for a greater good, like, say, in the case of the bombing of Libya. Similarly, the possibility of an occasional mistake cannot invalidate the argument for the death penalty.

Does fear of execution reduce crimes by deterring would-be culprits?

Terrorists won’t be deterred, of course, they would call it martyrdom. But potential rapists and violent killers? I am not so sure. Islamic countries under shari’a are said to have low crime rates.

To conclude. All the empirical and pragmatic arguments pro or con capital punishment are never decisive. Objections invite counter-objections and so on and so forth. The crux of the argument, if there is one, is deeper. Namely, not physical but metaphysical. Let me give a hint. I would suggest that the loss of confidence in a life beyond the grave is at root of the problem. If life is only for this world, death is horribly final, ultimate. But if it is not, as Christ and Qur’an teach, if there is another world, if Mors Ianua Vitae, if death is not the end, maybe another, transcendent light dawns upon the gallows...